Today is a special day, do not think about it, unforgettable - one of the prototypes of the important figure Jia Yuanchun in the "Book of Stones", the eldest daughter of Jiangning Weaving Cao Yin, and the nephew of Kangxi's nephew Pingjun Wang Neer Su Concubine Fujin Cao Jiashi 330th anniversary.
I should also emphasize that Cao Jiashi is the real author of the 120 -- "Book of Stones" Cao Fu (June 8, 1706 - 1775?). His sister, Cao Fu, is the archetypal character of Jia Baoyu and Zhen Baoyu, and Jia Mu is the image of the elderly Cao Jia, so Jia Zheng also has the shadow of Cao Fu.
The eighty-sixth time in the novel is written about Yuan Chun's birthday - when jia shen year ying yin month b day Xin Wei - the fortune teller blindly broke a pass, saying that this birthday has important numerological characteristics such as "heaven and moon two virtues sitting on the original life", "flying heaven and lu horse", "day lu return time" and so "must be a master's wife".
Is the fortune teller accurate? A large number of experts jumped out and said, quasi-quasi-
There is a red scholar in Hong Kong, Mei Jie Lao Xiansen, it is said that for the description of this plot, consulted the master of numerology in Hong Kong, and the numerology master said, quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-quasi-
There is a historian in Taiwan, Gao Yang Lao Xiansen, it is said that for the sake of this plot description, he consulted the numerology master in Taiwan, and the numerology master said, quasi-
There was originally a professor at Tsinghua University, Wang Xiaodun Xiansen, who, for the description of this plot, published a paper at the "International Academic Conference", saying that it was accurate and accurate, quasi- (Wang Xiansen later developed a little sexual condition in Taiwan, and later he was not a tsinghua professor.) ）
Hong Pi Mo Jiang Yuzhen, who specializes in the study of ancient Chinese fortune telling, discussed this plot description in his monograph, and also said that it was accurate and accurate, quasi-quasi-accurate, very accurate, that is, quasi-accurate!
Is the fortune teller accurate? My toes let out a barbell-like laugh – quasi-chicken feathers.
According to the rules of eight-character numerology deduction listed in the numerology classic "Three Lives General Society", from the eight characters of Yuan Chun's birthday, it is impossible to deduce the three auspicious characteristics of numerology written in the novel.
Fei Tian Lu Ma - This grid has only four days: Gengzi, Nonzi, Xinhai, and 癸海.
When the Sun Returns - There are seven days in this grid: Jiayin (按, nail day yin, the following categories), Ding Wu, Peng Wei, Ji Wu, Gengshen, Nonghai, and 癸子.
If there is "Tiande" or "Tiandehe" in the numerology of a person born in the first month (寅月), he must have "Ding" or "壬" in his four pillars and eight characters; if there is "Yue De" or "Yue Dehe" in the numerology of a person born in the first month, he must have "C" or "Xin" in his four pillars and eight characters.
The combination of day and hour with the above three numerological characteristics at the same time must be and only be "Nonzi Day Xinhai Time".
Through a series of complicated rules, I also deduced that the eight characters of the Yuan Chun birthday that conformed to the numerology of the fortune teller were and only "The Year of Nongshen Nongyin Moon Nonzi Day Xinhai Time", this birthday, that is, February 18, 1692, the second day of the first month of the thirty-first year of the Kangxi Dynasty.
Hu Wenbin (deceased), a researcher at the Institute of Dream of the Red Chamber of the Chinese Academy of Arts and a famous red scholar, after reading the papers I sent, ran to China's First Historical Archive to check the "Book of Wives", he probably found the "Book of Wives" in 1706 through internal relations and old friend Zhang Shucai, a researcher, and the "Book of Wives" clearly and clearly recorded that Cao Jia's birthday was and only "The Year of Nongshen Nongyin Moon Nongzi Day Xinhai Time"!
Until his death, Hu Wenbin refused to publicly state this fact.
The master of red studies, Feng Qiyong (deceased), also read the paper I sent that year, and according to Hu Wenbin, who told an editor of a publishing house, Feng Qiyong was so angry that he "threw out my paper."
My toes let out a barbell-like laugh.
Zeng Yanghua, the old head of the department of Chinese of Sun Yat-sen University and a red scholar, once patiently listened to me nagging a large number of arguments, and finally said, if your argument is correct, then the red study will be finished.
Mr. and Mrs. Hu Wenbin and Professor Zeng Yanghua (right) on November 21, 2017. Transferred from the WeChat signal of guangzhou red fan club.
However, the so-called "red academic circles" who take the Institute of Red Chamber Dream of the China Academy of Arts and the China Dream Society of The Dream of the Red Chamber as the front have long known my argument, have long known that the prototype of Yuan Chun is Cao Jiashi, have long known that Cao Jia's birthday is clearly recorded in the "Book of Wives", and have long known that the century-old "Red Studies" will inevitably be completely destroyed.
However, the "red academic circles" are still frantically spreading rumors, lying, cheating and making money, and the "red academic" enthusiasts are still scratching the blind and nonsense.
The poet Haizi wrote a beautiful poem with one sentence - On the empty sun / I endure the pile of ashes of mankind.
Some gangsters fooled the broad masses of the people into saying that there was no "Marriage Album" in the Qing Palace archives! So hilarious. I think the last madness of the "Red Scholarly Community" is to hide or destroy the "Marriage Book" that records Cao Jia's birthday – but there is no egg.
More than ten years ago, I gave Teacher Yizhuang a phone call to confirm that the "Marriage Book" did record the birth date and date of the wife of a man in the clan room. Teacher Ding told me that the "Marriage Book" was still open for consultation before, but later I didn't know what the reason was.
Is it because of me? Huh, huh, huh.
Why doesn't the Chinese academic community check it? Why doesn't the Chinese press look it up? Why don't Chinese media people check it?
What morality, what conscience, what law, what shame, hmmm.
Whether I check it or not, things are clear to me, the broad masses of the people can be verified repeatedly, and the fifty-third time in the novel gives textual evidence to prove that Yuan Chun's real birthday is indeed "the second day of the first lunar month" instead of the "first day of the New Year".
It is very simple - the novel writes that on the "second day" of the "twenty-ninth day of the waxing moon", Jia Mu and others entered the palace to "Chaohe", and after Chaohe returned, they went to the ancestral shrine to worship their ancestors; the next day, Jia Mu and others entered the palace to "Chaohe" and also went to wish Yuan Chun a happy birthday.
From the beginning of the Han Dynasty, there were only two kinds of festivals "Chaohe" in successive dynasties, "Winter Solstice Chaohe" and "New Year's Day Chaohe".
According to the provisions of the "Rules of the Qing Dynasty, Volume 56, Rebbe, and Chaohui III", starting from the eighth year of Shunzhi, the "New Year's Day" (the first day of the first lunar month) should go to the Emperor and Empress Dowager; starting from the eighth year of the Kangxi Dynasty, the Emperor led the team to the Empress Dowager and the Empress Dowager on the day of the "New Year's Day", and the Empress led the team to the Empress Dowager and the Empress Dowager on the second day of the first month.
Because of this, Jia Mu and others will have two "pilgrimages" - the first day of pilgrimage is New Year's Day pilgrimage, which is to the emperor; the second day is to go to the empress dowager and the empress dowager, "also wish yuan chun qianqiu" - how is the real birthday of yuanchun not the second day of the first lunar month? The second birthday of the first lunar month coincides exactly with Cao Jia's birthday.
Many people do not understand that the novel's Yuan Chun birthday "Jia Shen Nian Ying Yin Month B 卯日", the corresponding Gregorian date is February 19, 1704. The second time in the novel, it is also written that Jia Baoyu was born the "next year" when Yuan Chun was born.
No one has ever figured out how the obvious mistake of "the following year" was caused. I tell you that this is a mistake that Cao Fu has carefully designed, implying his exact birth year.
Yuan Chun was born in the year of Jia Shen, so Jia Baoyu was born in the "year of Yi Unitary". Zhen Baoyu is "slightly one year younger" than Jia Baoyu, so Zhen Baoyu was born in the "Year of Chengjiao". Zhen Baoyu's family was prominent, and Emperor Taizu went down to Jiangnan and "took over his family four times" - this is of course based on Kangxi's four visits to Cao Yin Jiangning Weaving House.
Cao Fu happened to be born in the year of Chengshu.
In the novel, Cao Fu also specifically wrote about a characteristic calendar day - April 26, which is not often handed over.
The year when Jia Baoyushi was thirteen years old (from the eighteenth to the beginning of the fifty-third time), there were four characteristic calendar days:
(1) The 27th writes, "April 26" and "The Festival of The Seeds of the Untimely";
(2) The 30th time writes that the Wuduanyang Festival in the beginning of May has reached the "volt", indicating that it has reached the "summer solstice";
(3) The 50th time wrote that it had snowed in mid-October, and Jia Mu said that "this is the first snow in October", which indicates that the middle of October of that year has reached the "light snow" festival;
(4) The 53rd time writes that on the "second day" of the "twenty-ninth day of the waxing moon", Jia Mu and others entered the palace to "pilgrimage", this day is not "Chinese New Year's Eve", but "New Year's Day" and "the first day of the first lunar month", because since the Han Dynasty, there has been no "Chinese New Year's Eve dynasty", and "New Year's Day Pilgrimage" is the ceremonial ceremony of the dynasties, which shows that December of that year was a small month, only 29 days.
The last three feature calendar days are and are only 1719 —
Only "April 26 is not the time to hand over the mango seed" is not. What's the secret to that?
Since Jia Baoyu was 13 years old in 1719, his real year of birth was 1706. When was the mango seed of 1706?
The Perpetual Calendar shows that the year was the ugly time of April 26.
However, the Book of Ten Thousand Years of the King's Dynasty during the Tongzhi Dynasty clearly records that the mangso of the Forty-fifth Year of the Kangxi Dynasty was "the 26th of April".
The great Cao Fu carefully designed the "time code" in the novel, and no taidou, Kunlun, master, expert, or doctoral supervisor could see it until I visited the old one and saw the scenery of Yihong and Green.
Why doesn't the Chinese academic community come to verify it? Why doesn't the Chinese press report it? Why don't Chinese media people come to verify it?
Haizi wrote that I despised all the maidens and princes.
Born on February 18, 1692, what year did Cao Jiashi die? This is very important for examining the date of the book of the Stone.
According to the records of volume 335 of the Records of Emperor Gaozong of the Qing Dynasty, in February of the fourteenth year of Qianlong, Ding You, "The Ceremonial Department: The posthumous table of Therefore, The Posthumous Table of The King of Duoluoping County, Fu Peng, said, 'The subject's father, King Narsu of Ping County, was knighted by sin, and after his death, he was blessed with wang lizhi.' The subject mother Cao Shi, undefined, Empress Xiaoxian's great affairs, not with the weeping, the subject's heart is hidden, and the courtesy is appreciated', please have no example to help. Purpose: Do as requested by (Fu Peng). ”
Empress Xiaoxian was the original empress of Qianlong, who died on March 11, 1748, and Cao Jia was not eligible to enter the palace to attend the "memorial service" of Empress Xiaoxian because she had not restored the title of "Prince of Pingjun". In February of the fourteenth year of Qianlong (Qingming Festival on April 5, 1749), the Rebbe received Qianlong's edict of special grace and restored Cao Jia's "original seal". What is the reason and purpose of restoring this "as is"? Logically, this is not because Cao Jia has died, but most likely made Cao Jia eligible to participate in the Qingming Festival ceremony to honor Empress Xiaoxian.
That is to say, Cao Jiashi was still alive until the Qingming Festival in the fourteenth year of Qianlong.
In the "Mourning Hongxuan Original" "Supplementary Map Stone Record", Jia Mu died "at the age of eighty-two", and I think this age may be the number of years that Cao Jia's death.
In this way, Cao Jiashi did not die until 1774.
Of course, Cao Fu's "Book of Stones" was written after Cao Jia's death—in this way, the so-called "Commentaries on the Fat Yan Zhai of the Qianlong Period", such as the "Jia Shu Ben", the "He ji ben", and the "Gengchen ben", have once again been completely falsified.
Of course, the top level of the "Red Academic Circles" already knew that the so-called "Fat Yan Zhai Commentaries" were all forged and sold at high prices by Tao Su himself.
Yuan Chun in the novel has no heirs, but Cao Jia has four male babies. The eldest son, Fu Peng, was a close friend of the Qianlong Emperor, who was highly favored and the prototype of the King of Xiping County in the novel.
After Fu Peng's death, the title of "King of Pingjun" was attacked by Fu xiu, the fourth son of Cao Jia.
Fuxiu also has descendants living in Beijing, the old painter Yu Zhaoyuan, Yu Zhaoyuan's son Yu Xiangxin. I once called Mr. Yu lao to ask about the "Genealogy of Ai Xin Jue Luo" and told him about Cao Jia's birthday, "Nongshen Year Nongyin Moon Nonzi Day Xinhai Time".
More than ten years have passed, and I hope that Mr. Yu is still alive, or still commemorates Cao Jiashi like me.
(All right)
Recommended Reading:
Cao Fu's original "Stone Record" A hundred years of "red learning" dream
What exactly is written in "Dream of the Red Chamber"? ——Commemorating the 313th anniversary of the birth of Cao Fu, the author of "The Book of Stones"
Jia Baoyu was born on the "Day of the Medicine King": Cao Fu, the true author of "The Book of Stones", was born on June 8, 1706
TanChun was born on the Qingming Festival: The Red Scholarly Circles maliciously concealed the record of Cao Yin's second daughter's day in the "Book of Wives"
Cao Xueqin, Dream of the Red Chamber, the deep shame of a century-old China
Cao Fu's Family Lineage and Life Examination: The "Biggest Missing Person" in the History of Chinese Literature and Even in the History of World Literature
The 120 surviving "Dream of the Red Chamber" are narrated year by year according to the real chronological sequence from 1706 to 1724
The astronomical calendar phenomenon described in Dream of the Red Chamber and its hidden great secrets
Before his death, the famous red scholar Hu Wenbin knew that the century-old red science scam created by Hu Shi would inevitably be completely destroyed
The famous red scholar Hu Wenbin inspected the "Book of Wives" in the Qing Palace before his death to confirm the major secrets of "Dream of the Red Chamber"
Tip please enter:
The source of abnormal lead ore in early Chinese bronzes is the ancient tin lead mine in Rooiberg, South Africa