#分手后迟迟忘不了对方, what to do #
Hu Zhengliang, the winner of the 7th Calligraphy Lanting Award and a young calligrapher, recently made a guest appearance in the online live broadcast room to talk about the current controversy in calligraphy cognition.
Hu Zhengliang believes that there is a controversy in the cognition of calligraphy
Hu Zhengliang believes that the controversy over calligraphy cognition is a normal phenomenon in itself, and it is a reasonable phenomenon, if the calligraphy cognition of people across the country is the same, there is no need to learn.
It is precisely because everyone's level of cognition is different that calligraphy has the meaning of learning. He jokingly said: "Everyone has a low level of cognition, and those who write well will behave well, so that some talents will stand out." If everyone's cognition is the same, then how do some people make money by running a class to recruit students? That's a joke. ”
Hu Zhengliang said that there are indeed several calligraphy cognitions in the country at present. The first kind of cognition, that calligraphy should be as close as possible to the ancients, as close as possible to the tradition, there are many calligraphers in this school, the things of the ancients as the supreme law, as far as possible to approach, whether it is tool materials, or writing mood in all aspects must find ways to try to be as close as possible.
The second kind of cognition is that the more innovative calligraphers, some of the Western concepts of composition, some of the concepts of ink color and chapter law in painting, to introduce it into calligraphy, in fact, this kind of attempt is very bold, including Mr. Zeng Xiang, Mr. Wo Xinghua to do these attempts is very meaningful, although everyone has some views, feel a little unconventional, but an era always has to have some people to do bold attempts.
This era has really not been before, who knows what the calligraphy masterpieces of this era are? Do we think that's what we're writing now? Not necessarily, not necessarily!
As some netizens said, the collision of Chinese and Western cultures, the styles of two huge ancient civilizations on the same thing are very different, and the progress of art will also experience the impact of cultural integration, integrating new elements, and trying to do so is inevitable.
The development of calligraphy can be developed vertically or horizontally, and it is very difficult to go deep into tradition, because the ancients have reached a peak, and it is not easy to come out of a peak in the contemporary era; horizontal development is to introduce foreign elements, to be integrated and grafted, although the risk is relatively large, but it is relatively easy, such as some more superficial people with syringes can create a style.
Netizens believe that there is nothing wrong with calligraphy trying to innovate, but calligraphy has a law, there are strict rules, if you jump out of this law, it is not calligraphy, it may be fine art or performance art. Trying, exploring, innovating, and so on all need to be the first to be the first to eat crabs. However, the question is the wrong direction, deviating from the most essential thing of Chinese calligraphy? He was supposed to eat crab but he went to eat centipedes, is this attempt still correct?