Guan Xiaotong's new movie pounces on the street! The box office in the 4 days of release just exceeded 15 million, and Douban scored 3.5 points

This year's movie market is so cold!

19 new films were released in 3 days, and all the pre-sales added up to more than 10 million.

There have been no high-grossing films since the New Year.

It was hard to fly by "Chosin Lake" recently.

It was suppressed by another big bad movie, "Turandot".

How bad is Turandot?

On a certain petal, the opening score was only 3.9 points, and it did not take long to drop to 3.7 points.

Only a few days after the release now? Dropped another 0.2 points.

The audience scolded, and after watching the film, they raised their hands and gave a bad rating.

"Two strange flowers in the history of China's bad films".

Losing word of mouth and losing the box office, when it was released for four days, it harvested more than 15 million.

The number of films has dropped below 2%, which is really bleak.

When the trailer came out, everyone was not optimistic.

Wait to see how bad the positive film can be!

The eyes will be so poisonous, one is because I know that "Turandot" is not easy to shoot.

Turandot is an adaptation of an Italian opera.

This opera is an adaptation of the Arabic "One Thousand and One Nights".

The Arabs adapted persian narrative poems, and the Persians adapted them from Chinese folk tales...

In short, it is a mess, although the roots are Chinese, but it has long been a story from a Western perspective.

We made "Turandot", similar to Disney's "Mulan".

It's easy to be out of tune and unpopular at both ends.

Zhang Yimou's "The Great Wall" is like this, European and American audiences do not like it, and Chinese audiences refuse.

Second, "Turandot" combines almost all the elements of a bad film.

The director of "Turandot" is the famous Zheng Xiaolong.

However, the director has mainly worked on TV dramas before.

TV drama directors make movies across circles, and even if the director is a cow, it is easy to make bad movies.

Teng Huatao, the director of "Shanghai Fortress", is a lesson from the past.

Teng Huatao is the one who made "Snail House".

Zheng Xiaolong's skills are absolutely powerful.

In "Meritorious Service", the Tu Youyou part directed by Zheng Xiaolong was well received by the audience.

I don't know why, but in "Turandot" it became like this...

Zhang Yimou, who has filmed "The Big Red Lantern Hangs High", can make "Three Guns Shooting Surprise".

Lu Chuan, who has filmed "Coco Xili", can pull his crotch to "The King's Feast".

Now you can add a Zheng Xiaolong.

The directors have something in common.

Big productions, big publicity, big name actors, all kinds of blowing up to the tall.

The result is a piece out, snap! Not even the full story is told.

The actors "Turandot" is looking for are definitely not inferior to the above.

There is Jiang Wen.

There is Hu Jun.

There is the world-famous "Rose of France" Sophie Marceau.

There's also the Swiss handsome Vincent Perez.

These excellent actors maintain a consistent level of performance in Turandot.

Jiang Wen performed a complex image of the Great Khan: both the majesty of a monarch and the father who pampered his daughter.

Hu Jun played the villain of the prodigal son's ambitions very emotionally, subverting the image of the hero who was awe-inspiring in the past.

Sophie Marceau is also a bright presence, netizens said that watching this movie should be to pay back Sophie movie tickets.

Unfortunately, no matter how strong the actor is, he can't beat the film.

In Turandot, they also "contributed" the worst image since the film.

Jiang Wen with a double ponytail, golden straps, and a pinch of small bangs.

It is said that this is approved by the Jiang Wen people.

I remembered that Jiang Wen had auditioned for "Overlord Farewell" to play Cheng Butterfly, and was very satisfied with his mop head shape.

Uncle Jiang Wen, your aesthetic is not good, the director does not care!

It was the first time Sophie Marceau had worn such a poor costume.

Compared with her costume in "Braveheart", she appeared to say what is called a shop-to-goods.

The shape is even worse, and it is made into the kind of shawl that is distributed.

Please, regardless of the West and the East, the ancient nobles kept their hair meticulously!

Hu Jun is still full of tough temperament, that is, the clothes are too plastic.

Look at the "Chosin Lake" next door, Hu Jun played a very wonderful role in Lei Gong.

"Turandot" really blinded his acting skills.

Netizens joked that "Turandot" is "Hu Jun Jiang Wen's lack of money".

No matter how famous and powerful the actor is, he must be cautious when receiving the film, which is easy to ruin the reputation.

The heroine Guan Xiaotong has more slot points.

The shape is like an inferior fairy tale drama, and it appears with a piece of cloth.

Blue eyeshadow, purple lip makeup, what kind of aesthetic can paint this kind of makeup.

Was the heroine poisoned the whole time?

Netizens complained, "A group of foreigners wearing Song Dynasty clothes walked in the palace of the Yuan Dynasty."

As for Guan Xiaotong's acting skills, there is no need to say anything more, the shortcomings of "Turandot" are enough.

These are still secondary, drama plays, and scripts are key.

Zheng Xiaolong pulled Wang Xiaoping, the screenwriter of "The Biography of Zhen Huan", to shoot "Turandot", and even filmed the taste of palace fighting drama.

The former dynasty usurped power misplaced, the harem princess sought love, and the prince took revenge and sacrificed for love.

A complete set of palace fighting dramas, but with more Western magic elements.

The love between the male and female protagonists is separated by a deep hatred in the sea of blood.

The two people only experienced some tribulations, and the male protagonist easily accepted the female protagonist.

This treatment is too sloppy, and emotional expression is superficial.

The audience is too late to empathize with the characters, and the story is over. Can you not give a bad review?

And the film lacks a theme and fails to bring together the scattered story lines.

Love, magic, court, scheming, political battles... Whatever the ingredients are in one pot.

However, it's just a hodgepodge of things, and there is no essence.

Netizens summed it up well: everyone is performing their own performances, and they do not interfere with each other.

The words are vague and do not have the weight of an epic blockbuster.

The most exposed shortcomings of the director is the lens.

What should be given is not given, and what should not be given is a slow motion.

In addition to the good picture, the lens language cannot tell a good story.

The director has an unshirkable responsibility.

The light visual effect is not good, and everyone is not looking at the exquisite PPT.

Netizens' comments are more exciting than the plot.

The audience's aesthetic has long been improved, not so good to fool.

The consequence of not having to pay attention to filming is to pounce on the street.

Ami would like to say:

This piece can't be saved and carried away!