The British royal family's Internet celebrity concubine Megan Markle and her husband Prince Harry have now become professionals who sell royal privacy, and the two have obtained huge profits by exposing the royal family's unknown secrets by participating in TV talk shows, opening online live broadcast rooms, and cooperating with film and television companies to shoot royal-themed films.
The British royal family unexpectedly remained silent about the Meghans' behavior of getting rich by exposing the secrets of the royal family, and the royal family headed by Queen Elizabeth II did not take any practical action against the Meghans to stop the Meghans.
Moreover, the Queen has also shown a friendly attitude towards Meghan and Harry in public many times, which has confused many royal fans who are watching from the sidelines, and do not know what attitude the Queen has towards the Meghans in her heart.
In fact, the Queen's true attitude towards the Meghans was made clear through one of her actions very early. According to a report published by the British media on February 9, local time, two royal biographies of the war publicly commented on the matter to the media.
Dylan Howard and Andy Tillett, authors of Royalty at War: The Untold Story of Harry and Meghan's Astonishing Split with the Windsor Family, claim that the Queen of England, through one of her actions, had shown her true attitude towards the Meghans years earlier.
According to the two royal biographers, the baptism of Archie, the son of the Meghans, took place on July 6, 2019, at a private chapel at Windsor Castle, when Archie was only two months old.
At that time, a large number of members of the royal family participated in this rather solemn baptism, but only two people were missing: Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Archie's great-grandparents.
Baptisms are often an important event on the royal calendar, attended by all senior members of the family, to watch this highly symbolic ceremony.
Dylan Howard and Andy Tillett see the Queen's choice not to attend this high-profile event as a clear signal that the Queen is dissatisfied with the Meghans and that her relationship with the Meghans is strained.
They commented: "The Queen and Prince Philip have clearly left, and according to a high-powered palace insider, they are only openly embarrassed by Meghan's controlling behavior, and the Queen's relationship with Meghan is very tense." ”
Obviously, if Dylan Howard and Andy Tillett's views are true, then the British royal family will not continue to tolerate the Meghans' practice of constantly exposing the privacy of the royal family to gain personal interests, and I believe that the British royal family will take some form of action in the near future to stop the Meghans' behavior of digging the royal wall.
No matter how friendly the Queen's attitude towards the Meghans on the surface, if she is not even willing to participate in such an important ceremony as the baptism of the Meghans' son, it is obvious that the signal sent by this is also very obvious.
Because for people in Western countries, especially royals, baptism is one of the most important ritual activities in life, if the relationship is not bad to a certain extent, it is basically impossible to be absent from such an important ritual activity, so the views of these two royal writers are actually not random speculation, and there is a certain credibility.
Any comments on this are welcome.