Introduction: Why did Elder Xiaogang "engage" Tesla? Why does Xiao Li Flying Car have to work hard to "escort" Tesla? Rational eating melon can see, why should it climax. Lovely fair haha...
The 24th of the Lunar New Year, the Southern Lunar New Year.
The sound of firecrackers outside the window is one after another, and the big hot news on the mobile phone is full of screens - Tesla will sue the vibrato car class tens of millions of big V Xiao Gang senior.
Honestly, I noticed such a message in the morning.
Ben did not care, in the preparation of other topics, there is no fuss, there are results and then look around OK.
Unexpectedly, in just half a day, such a car circle news quickly went out of the circle, not only on the hot search, but even attracted a variety of non-car circle large and small media, including personal media strong onlookers.
Even some financial bloggers on Douyin, who are not related to cars, also rushed to the temple fair to interject...
Related topics quickly became hot news
Speechless and can't help but sigh, sure enough, the end of the year is almost the New Year, all kinds of bloggers are generally too "idle", such a "tearing" information can trigger a collective climax, quickly evolved into a public hot news?!
The legal level is handed over to the law, and we will not discuss it here.
A few questions, as well as a few personal comments:
Question 1: If you don't prosecute early and don't prosecute late, why do you sue at this time?
As we all know, the Tesla "brake door" incident was a popular network in April last year, including Xiao Gang, many car circle media, Douyin car bloggers, related reports and test videos are also concentrated in that time last year.
Why was there no prosecution last year, and only now at this juncture?
According to Le Tease Auto Observation, the answer is actually not difficult to understand, because recently another automotive "net red" blogger on Douyin, Xiao Li Feiche, has been targeting Xiao Gang's "engaging" Tesla last year, and he is frantically intimidating Xiao Gang, and has produced a series of "smashing cylinder" videos.
After Xiao Gang was "hammered" by Xiao Li, forced by a large number of netizens to chase and intercept and the pressure of public opinion, he made a video response to this, and personally admitted in the video that he "stepped on the electric door".
Originally, Xiao Li chased after The Hammer Xiao gang, has been on the vibrato (in the group of people who pay attention to the car) has made a lot of noise, Xiao Gang's own personal admission, is equivalent to his own "suspected fraud" This controversy point to sit on.
Originally, Xiao Li's continuous hand tearing and hammer made this matter once again arouse high heat and attention, and now Xiao Gang handed a knife to Tesla's legal department, can Tesla not be happy to eat?
Xiao Li Feiche sent a video "popping hammer" to smash the cylinder
Question two: Why did Xiao Li Feiche do Tesla on Xiao Gang's senior, hold on to it and continue to "smash the cylinder"?! Is Xiao Li Flying Car a rescue soldier sent by Tesla?
In this regard, we do not make a qualitative conclusion, but combined with the long-term, various cheers and shouts to Tesla on the Vibrato number, it is not difficult to see that "the relationship between Xiao Li and Tesla is not ordinary."
Everyone in this industry understands, it depends on whether you are confused or not. What is that sentence called, there is never love and hate in the world for no reason. Or to put it more simply and rudely, the world is bustling with profit, and it is not profitable to get up early.
The mantra in Xiao Li's video - cute fairness, haha laugh and no words, everyone is not stupid, Xiao Li must not press the IQ of netizens to the ground and rub.
Doubts have been said, and our personal views and opinions on this have also been made clear, so let's talk about a few personal views:
First, Tesla sued Xiao Gang, or car companies sued the media (including all kinds of network masters, Internet celebrities, self-media, etc.) in the broad sense today), which were not uncommon before, are now very common, and will be more common in the future, and there is no fuss.
The times are improving the speed of the Internet, from the traditional newspapers, magazines, television, websites, and then to today's various mobile Internet APP, Vibrato, Kuaishou and other short video platforms, today's readers and every consumer, can have their own communication and voice channels.
This is also why in recent years, there is a saying in the industry called the era of self-media and the era of crowd media.
The advantage of this is that everyone can speak out and can be "exposed", but corresponding to the increasingly frequent lawsuits and public opinion wars caused by words, everyone must bear the corresponding moral and even legal risks while speaking out.
Since Xiao Gang can "engage" Tesla, Tesla can naturally also "engage" Xiao Gang Senior, if you tear it up, you can see it, and if you fight a lawsuit, it will be handed over to lawyers and judges.
We don't have to follow the "climax", and it can be predicted that similar things will only be more and not less in the future.
Second, the current public opinion environment we are in, or the relationship between the media and readers, who is responsible for whom?
First of all, the word media is very large, we may wish to be more specific about the relationship between the auto media, car manufacturers, and readers and netizens.
There is a word called mediocre, there is a word called the rabble, in the author's opinion, let's call it netizens and melon-eating masses, we have not had the habit of "paid reading" for a long time.
In the past, listening to music was free, watching videos was also free, and now more and more music needs to recharge members, and videos are the same, to put it bluntly, it is "paid system".
This is a good thing, intellectual property rights will eventually be better protected, and the legitimate rights and interests of content creators and providers should also be protected.
At least for now, we have not yet popularized "paid reading"
Ask yourself, now the majority of netizens and consumers in a variety of websites, APP and other platforms, look at the car graphics, video, audio, etc., is not required to pay? It's all free to watch.
Empathy, these content creators and providers, including platforms, also have to eat and earn money, where does the money come from?
It is no exaggeration to say that at least in the past and now, including for a long time to come, it is the advertising of car companies and manufacturers that feeds the media ecology.
So do you think that in essence, will it be responsible for netizens and melon-eating masses?
Of course, the wool is out of the sheep, and eventually the car manufacturers will eventually transfer these costs to thousands of netizens, readers and consumers.
As for why Xiao Gang wants to "engage" Tesla, and why Xiao Li Feiche has to work hard to "escort" Tesla, they themselves know best.
Netizens, not only do not have to pay for the content, but also can be a mouthful of a "recharge gang", xiao Lizi at least in this case, naturally became "the messenger of justice, and the guardian of fairness that can be opened"...
Needless to say, the Internet is not a lawless place, no one is obliged to be responsible for you, everyone has to be responsible for themselves!
All 2022, I wish all walks of life to eat melon masses IQ sesame blossom year after year higher, within the scope of the law rational eat melon.