According to Intel, they will release arc series graphics cards at the end of this quarter, from the current flow of various tests, it is estimated that it will be some entry-level graphics cards first, the desktop version of the A380 unique display has long appeared in the test database many times, and the mobile version of the A370M also appeared in the BAPCo database at the end of last month, but their test software is mainly test CPU-based, and there is not much reference significance.
Now Intel Arc A370M appears in SiSoftware Sandra's test number, this has a certain reference value, at least can know the basic computing power of the graphics card, but the GPU specifications identified by the software are actually not correct, it counts the number of ARC A370M and UHD 770 EU together, the whole 160EU out, in fact, UHD 770 32 EU plus Arc The A370M's 128 EU is only right, the GPU frequency may not be very accurate, 1.55GHz This is exactly the frequency of UHD 770, it is not easy to judge the actual frequency of the Arc A370M.
The software tested that the computing power of arc A370M is still OK, the half-precision floating-point computing power is 10612.4 Mpix/s, the single precision is 5208.4 Mpix/s, the double precision is 250.09 Mpix/s, the four precision is 27.4 Mpix/s, the overall result of the test is 2399 Mpix/s, this test result is slightly lower than gtX 1650 SUPER, the latter average score is 2568 Mpix/s, but compared to RX The 580 is higher than 2292 Mpix/s.
The previously exposed desktop version of Arc A380 unique display score in this test is 2956 Mpix/s, the mobile version of Arc A370M score it is about 23% lower, in fact, the GPU size of the two should be the same, are 128 sets of EU with 64bit 4GB GDDR6 video memory, but the desktop version of the power limit and frequency should be more open than the mobile version, so it has caused such a performance gap.