The Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson: This is not a scandal, it is the collapse of democracy

Making a household fuss is usually a disaster, not to mention the Queen's grandson and granddaughter-in-law. An interview with The British prince, Harry, Duke of Sussex, and his wife Meghan in an interview with oprah, the "queen of talk shows" in the United States, was broadcast in the United States and the United Kingdom, triggering a global onlookers. According to the British media, the original royal staff drafted a statement in response to the allegations of the Harrys on the 9th, emphasizing the royal family's love and concern for the two, but the queen stopped the statement and said that it needed more time to consider. Britain's "Daily Mirror" believes that the British royal family is facing the "most serious crisis in 85 years" since Edward VIII, who "loves beauty and does not love the country", gave up the throne. Or support the little two, or sympathize with the old grandmother, the global "eating melon" masses stand in a clear two teams, even the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova did not miss the hilarity, she said in a Facebook post, after reading the interview to understand more clearly what the British monarchy characteristics of democracy is like, "even if the most protected people in the British elite, if not in line with the wishes of the ruling clique, there is no sense of security."

Charles and William "very sad"

The Daily Mirror quoted a British royal source as saying on the 9th that Harry's father, Crown Prince Charles, and his brother Prince William were "very sad" about what the Harrys said in this interview. Not only that, but the Harrys' allegations that their son Archie's skin color was "discriminated against by members of the royal family" plunged the British royal family into "fear and depression". The queen, who is about to turn 95, immediately held a crisis meeting with her son Charles and eldest grandson William to discuss how to respond to the allegations. The Independent said on the 9th that the British royal family will break the tradition of remaining silent in the past and may issue an official statement on the matter on the 10th, focusing on responding to the Harrys' allegations of racial discrimination against anonymous royals.

According to the Daily Mail, before the interview with Harry and his wife was broadcast, the Queen of England issued a "Commonwealth Day" statement on the 8th local time, emphasizing the importance of maintaining contact with her family and "performing her duties". She said that while the pandemic over the past year has prevented many family members from being together, staying connected with each other will eliminate barriers and divisions.

"Britons are generally saddened to see the royal family develop to the point where it has been," the Daily Express said, adding that the harrys' shocking accusations were made public on the 70th anniversary of the Queen's accession to the throne, while Prince Philip, 99, was still in hospital.

In fact, the interview has led to another wave of doubts about the monarchy around the world. Megan McCain, daughter of the late Republican Senator McCain, tweeted: "Monarchy has been an ancient and harmful concept since 1776. Former Australian Prime Minister Turnbull told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on the 9th that the Harrys supported his view in this interview, that Australia should sever its constitutional ties with the British monarchy: "Do we really want the king or queen of the United Kingdom to automatically become our head of state?"

Stammer, leader of the British opposition Labour Party, said on the 8th that it is necessary to "take very seriously" the allegations of racism and mental health in the interview. "In a sense, it's not just a royal family problem," he said. And when British Prime Minister Johnson was asked at a press conference on the 8th whether he should investigate the Harrys' allegations against the royal family, he declined to comment on the queen's domestic affairs: "I have always greatly admired the queen, and her role in our country and the Commonwealth, as for other things, all things related to the royal family, I will not comment, and today is the same." ”

The mother-in-law "supports the waist", and the in-laws are "angry"

Contrary to Downing Street's caution, the White House openly supported the "daughter who married out." On the 8th, White House press secretary Psaki said at a press conference, "Obviously, many of us have seen this interview. She praised Meghan's candor, saying that "anyone who stands up and talks about their struggles with mental health issues and their private affairs need courage, and Biden certainly thinks so." She said the White House would not comment further, given that the Harrys are now ordinary residents living in California. Psaki also stressed that the "strong and enduring special partnership" between the United States and the United Kingdom would "last."

The Harrys' outpouring won much sympathy in the United States. Actress Arquette praised Harry for breaking away from his original family: "Prince Harry gave up everything to protect his own family and ensure Meghan's true safety and happiness. This is the real prince. Goreman, a young poet who recited poems at Biden's inauguration, praised Meghan as "the greatest opportunity for change, revival and reconciliation in the British royal family in the new era." They didn't just abuse her, they missed it." Actor Jordan shouted to Megan, "Come back, baby. In the United States, more people can live the life of a queen than in Britain. CNN said Meghan's marriage to her prince had made it clear how "the story of Cinderella marrying a prince is dangerous and wrong."

British domestic voices are more antagonistic, The British Sky News quoted poll data on the 9th that after the program was broadcast, 38% of the respondents expressed different degrees of sympathy for senior members of the royal family, while 45% of them thought they did not need or deserved sympathy. But at least a significant number of Britons believe that "the couple puts personal well-being above public responsibility". "What they did was infuriating", British Sky News said on the 9th, Harry and Meghan's big secret interview was a "very selfish and narcissistic gimmick" in order to "humiliate" those who run the royal family. "They are a very naïve couple and simply can't handle stress well" The couple may have felt the need to curry favor with the world, but "threw the Queen and the 1,200-year-old royal family to the bottom of London's buses.", the report said. British TV host Morgan also said the couple was "selfish, lying, controlling and untrustworthy" — "I'm getting angry today." I was disgusted by what I had just seen. This two-hour garbage marathon dialogue slammed our royal family, the monarchy, and everything the queen had worked so hard to get. And all this was done while Prince Philip was still in the hospital. Royal family expert Steven Jobson called the interview "a great insult to the British people." They dropped a huge grenade on the royal family and the monarchy." Another royal expert, Levin, predicted: "In a few years Harry will regret accepting this interview." They have no emotional intelligence. The Financial Times said Harry and Meghan's remarks also weakened the royal family's role as a link to the United Kingdom and encouraged independence movements in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

The "Versailles pain" was ridiculed

In addition to the tit-for-tat confrontation between public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic, people from all over the world also have a unique perception and alternative perspective on what the Harrys did. After watching the interview program, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zakharova ridiculed "democracy with british monarchy characteristics" on Facebook on the 8th, "This is not a scandal, this is the collapse of democracy." She also denounced "collusion between the British ruling clique and the media" and "as the Duke and His wife of Sussex have confirmed, any issue can be turned upside down by the British media at the direction of those in power." We have experienced this more than once in events such as Litvinenko, Berezovsky, Sklipal, the White Helmets, etc. ”

Bell, a historian at queen Mary University of London, told the Financial Times on the 9th that these polemics may fuel the cultural war that has erupted in the UK since the Brexit referendum, providing "ammunition" for some politicians: "If they can portray Meghan and Harry as princes and princesses opposed to other royals and power groups, they will not hesitate to do so." ”

"Is Megan the second Princess Diana?" The New York Times said on the 9th that the British tabloids liked to portray Meghan as the duchess of Windsor - a divorced American woman who abducted their king in 1936 and lived a miserable exile with him ever since. Still, Megan seems to position herself as the "Diana of today," a woman who has been abused by her in-laws, and instead of guilty, she is the one who is abused. Harry thinks the same way, comparing what happened to his mother and wife, and saying he "felt her (Diana's) presence throughout the process." This gives the impression of a "Shakespearean play," the report said.

On the 8th, the Us Political News Network satirized Megan's self-description of her "painful life" in the Uk, some "Versailles", "Although Megan said that now that all of us have experienced the lockdown during the epidemic, we will feel some pain, but in fact most of us have no chance to be trapped in a mansion with 9 bedrooms and 16 bathrooms."

Source: World Wide Web