"A leaf knows autumn" means that by seeing the subtle changes of a leaf, you can know that autumn is coming, which is through the ability to perceive the macroscopic through microscopic perception.
This ability is also called:"Subtle", and today I will show you the "Subtle Mind Method".
The "micro-mind method" means that after accumulating a lot of knowledge to "build a foundation", it is often possible to see the problem at a glance to see through the essence of things.
One : One leaf can know autumn X 1
Everyone should know the Indian actor "Aamir Khan", right?
Aamir Khan, India's big star, often lashed out at India and was very friendly to China.
And that's why the Beijing Winter Olympics have only one Indian athlete participating.
Muhammad Arif Khan, the only Indian participant in the Beijing Winter Olympics, is an alpine skier.
After arriving in Beijing, Arif posted a photo of himself "surrounded" by Chinese medical personnel wearing tight protective gear on his social media accounts.
In an interview with the Global Times, he said:
"I posted this photo just to show how China's security measures really protect everyone and how they can take precautions in practice to protect the safety and health of athletes."
He praised China's epidemic prevention, saying that China's epidemic prevention is the best way for medical staff to protect themselves.
I don't know if the third brother will break the defense and be angry after hearing it.
According to the Global Times interview, Arif's attitude towards China is very friendly.
Why is he so kind?
Aamir Khan is written in english: Aamir Khan Arif Khan in English letters: Arif Khan
Did you find anything interesting?
They are all khans, khan is a big surname derived from the nomadic peoples of Central Asia, and the khan has deep roots with China.
After the Tang Dynasty shook the four directions, greatly destroyed the eastern Turks, and after the Turks surrendered, Li Shimin was called "Heavenly Khan" by the surrendered Turks.
Some of the Turkic nomads fled for their lives in Central Asia, and the Khans who later distributed in Central Asia, Afghanistan, and India all came from this way.
Of course, this does not mean that the current khans are all Chinese, but that the name originated in northern China.
Later, the northern nomads who were scattered and fled spread to the whole world, affecting all ethnic groups in the world.
Aamir Khan, Arif Khan, and His Holiness have little to do with China.
So why do indians called Khans have a relatively better attitude toward China?
Because the Khan was a believer in the Middle East religion in India, the nomadic peoples who originated in northern China all accepted middle Eastern religious beliefs after leaving China.
In this part of India, Hindus are the majority, and religious believers in the Middle East are a minority.
The current Modi government is a Hindu government, which pursues a policy of Hindu supremacy and suppresses the religious believers in the Middle East in India, and the so-called enemy of the enemy is the friend.
Although China does not regard India as an enemy, the Sino-Indian border conflict is entirely India's own touch.
But as far as India is concerned, many of them do think we are enemies.
Therefore, in the eyes of the Followers of the Middle East religion in India, since the Indian Government hates China, Chinese is a friend that we "Religious Believers in the Middle East" can unite.
Therefore, India's "Middle Eastern religious believers" often like to give China a ovation and criticize India in various ways.
Of course, what they attacked was really justified, of which Amir Khan was a typical example, and he did not approve the praise for a day, and his heart itched.
This time China hosted the Beijing Winter Olympics, Modi announced that he would not boycott, but because the previous Sino-Indian relations were not happy, even if Modi wanted to restart Sino-Indian relations, this also needed a transition period.
Probably for this reason, there was a man who was clearly a "religious believer in the Middle East" in India.
Is it possible that Hindus in India are temporarily unable to ease their emotions and are unwilling to come?
And India's "Middle Eastern religious believers" have no such hatred at all, so it comes down?
I think there may be a reason for this.
What is Professional? The above analysis is called professionalism.
As soon as I looked at his name, I knew why he was so friendly to China.
The so-called Pakistan, our Pakistan Railway, which was separated from "British India", is a Middle Eastern religious state established by the followers of the Middle East in India.
You can understand that India's domestic Pakistan Railways are very happy to participate in the Beijing Winter Olympics.
I just want to say, welcome to Batie!
2nd: One leaf can know autumn X 2
During the Chinese New Year, I stumbled upon such a video.
The content is that there is a group of foreigners singing Christian Christmas songs on the streets of China.
The point is on the comments section, completely torn and divided.
Looking at the picture below, this is the video comment area, and The high praise is all refuting the "boycotters".
After reviewing the ins and outs, I found that this was the case.
First of all, this video was sent out, and after the masses saw it, they were very disgusted and uncomfortable.
This is related to China's social environment, we are not a religious society, and when we see people engaging in religious activities on the street, especially in Shanghai, it is easy to have a feeling of colonial religious and cultural invasion.
So at the beginning of the comment area, there must have been a lot of criticism and resistance.
But objectively speaking, there is nothing wrong with foreigners, the New Year is well, Chinese is the Spring Festival, foreigners are naturally Christmas elements.
So that's why the high praise above is all about criticizing and refuting those initial comments.
This means that you people are too narrow-minded, we are an international big city, and you will oppose it when foreigners sing a song, and you will be narrow-minded.
So what do you think about this?
Option A: Should be inclusive!
Option B: Should not be inclusive, be resisted!
The answer is that both options are wrong.
If you blindly tolerate the common feelings of such people, do you know how exaggerated this kind of thing can eventually grow barbarically?
Do not think that the aggregation of transnational population flows is a new thing, developed countries have already experienced it.
For example, when the United Kingdom was still in the European Union, it chose to be inclusive.
Britain is more international than Shanghai, after all, britain once had many overseas colonies, so the population movement is very complicated.
As a result, what was not envisaged happened, and after the inclusion was finally reached, the British in London were almost gone, and the rate of disappearance was comparable to that of "genocide".
Speaking of 2016 data, the situation is definitely getting worse now:
Only about 36% of London is a native of the UK, and that percentage is falling rapidly every year. 25% are: immigrants from other European countries, Americans, Australians, Jews. 17% are: South Asian immigrants. (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) 14% are: Africans
At a glance, the composition of the Immigration Area in London is clear.
Economic globalization will bring about the problem of transnational population movement, if your choice is to blindly tolerate, in the end, in the long run, it must be the end of the British model, but also the end of the EU model.
People from all over the world are constantly pouring in and then bringing their own cultures from all over the world to you.
Under the influence of this trade-off, your native people and culture will be "reverse assimilated" by the foreign population until it disappears naturally.
As early as 2012, the proportion of white people in the British capital London fell below 44.9%, and the natives became a minority in the country.
The worst is East London, where the fertility rate of white people is very low, and then after globalization, foreigners continue to move in, and the final result is a little scary.
The native white people of east London, England, have disappeared, literally.
The British BBC also made a documentary called "The Last White Man in East London", which is a bit of a feeling of shooting the natives as an endangered species.
The picture below is now East London, much like North Africa or the Middle East
So learning is important, reading is important.
If you are a parent, you should teach your child to watch the news. If you are young, learn to read the news.
The first time I saw this video, it didn't feel very fresh.
This contradiction is something that has already happened in East London and is widespread in the European Union.
If you don't control the cultural importation of transnational populations, you will eventually develop into a reverse assimilation of local people, and it will happen that your hometown becomes the hometown of others.
If you think about it, if Shanghai is full of churches of religions from all over the world, and then Chinese culture disappears, foreigners everywhere, does this feel very strange?
Why is the UK leaving the EU?
When britain was in the EU, the long-term globalization policy pursued by the EU was the kind of policy of opening up to transnational population and cultural disorder.
You are a foreigner, the culture you brought over I fully respect and tolerate, in the end what is the EU like now? As you can see, the more immigrants and the more culturally tolerant the EU countries, the closer they are to civil strife and civil war.
Zemoor, the candidate who exploded in France last year, rose to prominence by foreign cultures brought about by anti-immigration and anti-globalization.
Like the United States, nearly half of the French supported him, and the other half were French white leftists and immigrants who opposed him.
We should not be surprised if one day France is civil war over immigrants.
Including a short video hot search I saw on February 3, I didn't feel very new, this is the developed country disease we are experiencing.
Objectively speaking, there is nothing wrong with people, but I also feel that it is not worthy of pride or expanded publicity.
Because the tragic experiences of Britain, France, Germany, and the United States all tell us what kind of evil consequences will occur after these situations accumulate into a lot.
Each such individual may be free of malice, even good.
But the reality of the accumulation of small and large is that the civilization of the country is being replaced, thus creating contradictions.
Brexit, Trump in the United States, and Zemoor in France are all contradictions caused by the problem of transnational population mobility.
When these foreign sons-in-law are in the minority, when the foreign culture they bring is not the mainstream, when the economy is still good, often the natives can be tolerated.
Once the economy enters a downward cycle, these more and more foreigners will have fierce conflicts with their own people for resources in all aspects, and finally lead to the ebb and flow of globalization in the host country.
This is what is happening in Britain, France, Germany, the United States, what has happened, and it is these little bits of hot search "good news" that have accumulated for a long time.
And obviously, Trump's approach is not advisable, and his attitude to this kind of thing is to close the country and decouple from the world.
- It's also too extreme.
But who made Trump? Aren't these so-called people with boundless love? The consequences of disorderly openness and disorderly tolerance are not good.
Many people do not understand the consequences of the disorderly expansion of population movements under globalization.
The adoption of policies that lack censorship and excessive leniency towards foreign populations and cultures eventually led to indigenous conflicts and globalization resented by the people of the country.
In fact, the above matter is still related to the first paragraph of this article.
Three: One leaf can know autumn X 3
As we all know, when it comes to the degree of national openness and globalization, many people in China like to compare the Tang Dynasty.
To be honest, sometimes I don't even know if these people are in the high black.
If you study history well, you should know what happened after the disorderly tolerance of the Tang Dynasty, right? ——The Chaos of Anshi and the Destruction of Life!
This historical plot is not complicated, and the West is now playing this play.
At the beginning, when the country's economy was good, all the countries came to the dynasty, and then those foreign poor people began to praise and praise in order to stay here, so the country was overly open and tolerant.
Britain, France, Germany, the United States, it was like this.
And when the population of the "barbarians" in the territory became larger and larger, the ambitions of the barbarians expanded and they began to yearn for political rights.
In order to oppose the EU's policy of disorderly opening up, the United Kingdom has simply left the EU. France is facing civil war-style elections, full of gunpowder, Zemour directly said that he is ready to forcibly deport immigrants, and the rest will also snuff out foreign cultures and preserve French civilization through forced assimilation. Germany does not say, the territory of the millions of Middle Eastern believers is a huge thunder, every day there are vicious events, is not know when to fry. We are familiar with the United States, because of too many illegal immigrants, after the assimilation, the extent to which the internal division is, we also have it for all to see, right?
In fact, aren't these things a repeat of the Tang Dynasty: the Tang Dynasty - to the Anshi Chaos?
- Is it fresh? The old plot is up!
In that year, after Tang Taizong Li Shimin broke the Turks, in an instant, the surrounding departments submitted, and Tang Taizong was all kinds of flattery and praise.
Thus the following plot occurred:
Some of the Turkic tribes moved internally to the Tang Dynasty. Regarding how to deal with them, Tang Taizong thought that this was a big problem, so he summoned the group of ministers to discuss. Some ministers advocated dividing them into inland prefectures and counties to change their lives and customs; some ministers, such as Wei Zheng, believed that the Turks "were not of our race, but their hearts would be different" and that moving to the interior would cause trouble, and advocated that they should return to their original places of residence. Tang Taizong obeyed Wei Zheng on many major issues, but this time he did not adopt his opinion and agreed to Wen Yanbo's proposal. Wen Yanbo suggested that the inland Turks be placed in the land of Shuofang in Henan (around present-day Wushen banner in southern Inner Mongolia), preserving the original tribes, still governed by chiefs, maintaining the original customs and habits, and still focusing on animal husbandry production.
When the Tang Dynasty was strong in the early days, when it was still able to hold the scene, Tang Taizong said in a dashing manner:
"Since ancient times, china has been noble, a lowly outsider, and the love of the only is the same."
The vernacular translation is: the whole world is family, and like Bai Zuo, there is no border, refugees come at will, I love when they come, and there is absolutely no priority for their own people.
Later, because of the policy of his own Virgin Mary, which led to the beginning of turmoil in the country, when he was tired of counterinsurgency, Tang Taizong said:
"The Chinese people are the foundation of the world." The person on the outside is the same as the leaf, disturbing its roots with thick branches and leaves, and seeking long-term peace, there is no one. At first, wei did not declare his words, so he felt that the cost of labor was getting worse and worse, and he lost almost the way of long-term peace. ”
The vernacular translation is: Hey! I was wrong! After half a day, those outsiders who are in the scene are all wool, you are strong, they will be loose, you are weak, they will scatter, and even stab you back! Or only their own natives can trust ah, I regret not listening to Wei Zheng's truth! Regret scolding him for being narrow-minded.
When Tang Taizong was at his best, those nomadic tribes who submitted to him called him Tian khan.
But when the Tang Dynasty began to weaken, the nomadic tribes that submitted to the Tang Dynasty all began to eat their Heavenly Khans.
Unfortunately, during the Tang Taizong period, he did not completely solve the hidden dangers he left behind, and eventually by the time of Tang Xuanzong, he completely thundered.
I'm not against globalization, I'm not against foreigners.
It's just that when I've seen enough history, I don't think it's a question of inclusion or non-inclusion, because it's too simple to say.
Finally, let's talk about two famous science fiction theories.
The "Fermi Paradox", proposed by Nobel laureate Fermi, is a scientific paradox about the existence of alien civilizations.
Fermi said, "Where are the aliens?" If there are a large number of advanced civilizations in the galaxy, then why can't even evidence such as spacecraft or probes be seen? ”
The universe is more than 10 billion years old, there are hundreds of billions of stars in the Milky Way alone, and the sun that gave birth to us is only one of the younger ones. So even considering the impenetrability of the speed of light, we shouldn't be so lonely.
The earth has developed in such a short period of time, and all civilizations are so rich! There are so many planets in the universe, why are they empty? What the hell is going on?
Later, in order to explain the "Fermi Paradox", someone proposed the Great Filter theory.
Simply put, the Great Filter theory is that when civilization develops to a certain extent, you will encounter some key points, which are similar to the existence of the "wise son" in the three-body.
If you fail to break through this critical point, your civilization will be locked up and will never be able to go further.
Without economic openness, we cannot rise and develop. The economy is overly open and lacks good control. There will be an influx of foreign civilizations, which will eventually lead to the death of your civilization matrix.
Isn't this one of the key points of human lock-up for millennia?
Ancient Roman barbarian invasions, Tang Dynasty Anshi Rebellion, the rise of Latinos in the United States, EU refugees, immigration problems...
In fact, the khans of India are the same, if there are too many Khans in India, it is not a bad thing for China, if a civilization does not have cohesion, it is very fragile.
None of the United States has lived this point, and none of them have successfully broken through.
Trump's closed country, the EU's multiculturalism are examples of failure, and now it's up to us.
After the tang dynasty, more than a thousand years have passed, and we are back!
This time we are fighting globalization again, and I hope, I believe, that each of us will explore and work hard to give a better answer.
This time, we must challenge success.
This article is an open ending.
Because of this matter, it may take a whole generation to answer, how to properly handle it, and I will write follow-up in-depth thinking in the future.
Interestingly, the only key word thread that runs through this article is Khan.
The cycle of human history can be described as both success and sweat, and defeat and sweat.