How to maximize the utilization rate of vehicles within the limited car purchase budget is a problem that every family just needs is thinking about, and it is also a problem that every car company involved in the entry-level market has been thinking about.
In the field of compact cars, with the continuous efforts of independent brands in recent years, people will no longer choose joint ventures without brains when buying vehicles, and more and more consumers have begun to favor independent models with high cost performance, such as Evergreen Geely Emgrand, such as MG 5, which represents the sports school.
Both models have a high reputation and sales in the market, and their respective product performance has stood up to scrutiny. It is reasonable to say that these two models with different styles will also have obvious differences in the consumer groups, but due to the high degree of overlap in price, people will always have to compare the two when screening. So how do you choose the car that suits you best? We might as well use static comparisons to make a wave of simple analysis.
In terms of appearance, the two cars take a completely different style route. The typical family design language of the 4th generation Emgrand makes it look stable and imposing, the concave front grille with eye-catching LOGO, the recognition is quite high, the narrow headlight group, the smooth waistline outline and the through-style taillight design make the Emgrand add a little refinement and youthfulness.
MG 5 is the sport and personality route that young people especially like nowadays, the low-lying front end with a sharp independent headlight group, very impactful, the shape design of the back is also in line with the positioning of its sports car, in contrast, the design of the tail is a little too monotonous, and the exhaust design of the two sides strengthens the sports attributes.
Although the appearance of the vehicle has always been a random attitude, but for just need family users, it is obviously more appropriate to take a calm and moderate style of Emgrand, because TA can cope with a variety of travel scenarios, MG 5's appearance is indeed cool enough, but also because of its unique personality, resulting in some occasions are not suitable for appearance, too eye-catching and grabbing the limelight, in the travel scene utilization rate, relatively low.
In terms of spatial performance, Emgrand has a length, width and height of 4638/1820/1460mm and a wheelbase of 2650mm, while the length, width and height of the MG 5 are 4675/1842/1473mm and a wheelbase of 2680mm. In terms of spatial parameter performance, MG 5 is slightly superior. However, due to the fact that MG 5 adopts a sneakback style for the pursuit of sports, the rear space is inevitably compressed, and it is more comfortable to take the conventional Emgrand in the riding experience.
In terms of interior layout, these two cars also basically maintain the style tonality in appearance, the former is a normalized design, and the suspension central control screen is matched with a penetrating chrome trim, which is simple and generous. The latter continues to carry out the sense of sport to the end, and the central control adopts an asymmetrical design, and the overall shape is tilted like the driver's side, full of combat atmosphere. For the two stronger and weaker, completely different from person to person, I will not make too much evaluation here.
For the differentiation of the configuration, let's make a simple comparison with the entry-level automatic models that cost the same price. There is no doubt that the Emgrand, which has just been launched for less than half a year, is significantly thicker, with constant speed cruising, uphill assist, 12.3-inch LCD instrumentation, Internet of Vehicle OTA and rearview mirror electric function, which are all missing configurations of MG 5, which also has a certain advantage over Emgrand's halogen in the LED near and far light.
In terms of power, the automatic transmission entry-level model is also compared, and the Emgrand adopts a power combination of 1.5L + CVT, with a maximum power of 84kW, a peak torque of 147N·m, and an average fuel consumption of about 7.2L/100km. The MG 5 is equipped with a 1.5L + analogue 8-speed CVT, a maximum power of 88kW, a peak torque of 150N·m, and an average fuel consumption of about 6.8L/100km. The MG 5 defended its positioning as a "sports car" by a slight margin in the panel parameters of the power, and it also performed better than Emgrand in terms of fuel consumption economy. This advantage, in today's rapid oil prices, may become the primary consideration of many consumers.
For consumers who just need it, buying a car is to buy the kind that "gets up to the hall and gets the kitchen", that is, no occasion can not be afraid of the stage. The moderation of Emgrand's shape, the richness of the configuration, and the abundance of space, these factors that conform to the mainstream tonality of family cars, often become people's preferences in specific situations. MG 5's aggressive sports style, as well as good performance, does cater to the preferences of many young consumers, but in the face of family diversification travel scenes, it is inevitable to appear stretched, not as more handy as Emgrand.
*Some of the pictures come from the Internet, if there is infringement, please contact to delete