According to foreign media sources: Musk's brain-computer interface technology startup recruitment information has recently been exposed, and a director of the clinical trial room is being recruited. Speculation is that Musk intends to deliver on previous human experiment promises. This news quickly attracted the attention of netizens from all over the world in international forums, although in the previous artificial intelligence implantation "brain" experiment, macaques and pigs have been successful, but now to take the "human" knife, somewhat unacceptable.
Human experiments have always existed, and as a "medical means", there have been many use cases in ancient times. However, if you want to conduct human experiments, you still need to bear great pressure from public opinion. In 2021, Musk said to the outside world: the brain-computer interface device is currently progressing smoothly, and it is expected to be used next year for human spinal cord injury and quadriplegia patients. At the same time, Musk also said to the outside world: I hope that a group of testers can use this technology in 2021, and are currently waiting for the approval of the relevant departments in the United States. According to the current "signboard information", it is clear that the United States agrees with this behavior, so Musk's brain-computer interface project has officially begun to start.
With brain-computer interface technology, can the dream of "data immortality" be realized? Theoretically, brain-computer interface technology could store memories and then transfer them to the new "body." It is often said that as long as the memory exists, it is "eternal life". So from this point of view, data immortality can be achieved. After death, all memories are stored in the cloud disk until they meet the right "body" and transfer it to achieve rebirth. However, this technology will have a serious impact on human ethics and morality, and even endanger social stability. So whether to develop or not is a very important question.
Of course, from another point of view, if it can help more "paralyzed people", this technology is worth further development and research. Its working principle is similar to that of "machinery", but it only uses data to represent people. As long as the memory is still there, then you can start over. I have to admit that this technology has unlimited potential and can bring great benefits to mankind, but behind all these benefits, there are unimaginable disasters.
If the data can occupy the vast majority, and when it is implanted in the memory, it is tampered with and invaded by "viruses", then it will not be "controlled" in disguise. Or that people have begun to lose their reverence for life and the human body in order to get "data immortality". There are many, many such problems, and behind any huge interest, there is a huge disaster. Do you think that this data immortality technology is necessary for further development?
(Text/Xiaotie)