In the third quarter of today's Spurs game against the Nets, when the Nets' Griffin broke through to the inside line, he made a fake move under the basket and was directly thrown down by opponent Johnson! At this point the ball is from

In the third quarter of today's Spurs game against the Nets, when the Nets' Griffin broke through to the inside line, he made a fake move under the basket and was directly thrown down by opponent Johnson! At this point, after the ball was out of bounds after escaping from Griffin's hands, the referee immediately blew Griffin out of bounds! But why didn't the referee blow Johnson foul? Defenders have physical contact with offensive players after they take off, so why not blow Johnson fouls?

When Griffin took the ball and broke under the Nets basket, Johnson jumped up and tried to cover Griffin without thinking about it, and after Griffin was hit by Johnson, his hand slipped, which caused the ball to go out of bounds! However, the referee's blowing of Griffin's out-of-bounds ball is also controversial, because if Johnson does not hit Griffin, then Griffin's ball will not be out of hand, so Johnson's defensive foul is also more intuitive.

Do you think Johnson should blow griffin off the line or Johnson for a defensive foul?