The two big news stories have come to an end recently.
To say that it is news, it may be considered old news. King Ge divorced nearly two months ago; Mother Jiang's revenge is even further, and it has been six years now.
In the Internet era, people's freedom of expression has been infinitely extended. When such big news comes out, of course, it is inevitable to comment on it. Personal opinion, no matter how weird, is nothing, but if many people think like this, it can be seen as a trend.
There are two trends in the comments that make me vaguely worried.
The first trend is to doubt everything.
Doubting that everything is the basis of enlightenment, so that we can have independent thinking and judgment, do not be casually brainwashed by others, even if they are accidentally washed, they always retain the possibility of awareness, and reserve the opportunity to focus on independent thinking and judgment.
The purpose of doubt is not to doubt, but to discover what is worth believing. If it is expanded to the point of not believing in any basic facts, suspicion is also suspected of pathology.
It was the king of song who was sorry for his wife and let Li Lianglei lose her family; it was Liu Xin who pushed Jiang Ge out to block the knife, so that Jiang Ge lost her life, and Jiang Mu lost her daughter, which is the basic fact.
In the former, the attitude of the king of songs speaks for itself; in the latter, there are court confessions to support it.
As for the loss, there is no need to prove it.
The skeptics are just suspicious, using their suspicions to attack Li Lianglei and Jiang Mu, supportIng Ge Wang and Liu Xin, and discarding these basic facts.
They seem to have forgotten that Li Lianglei and Jiang Mu are the ones who are hurt.
The second trend is to require the victim not to have any flaws.
When it comes to the divorce of the king of song, there are always people in the comment area who say: "Li Lianglei is insatiable and only wants more money"; under the article about Liu Xin's sentence, there are always people shouting: "Jiang Qiulian, do you dare to talk about how the donations received were spent?" ”
Perhaps Li Lianglei is indeed fighting for as many benefits as possible for herself, and Jiang Qiulian has indeed spent a part of her donations to improve her life, which may be regarded as a flaw in the purest moral sense.
However, I think that even if Li Lianglei can get more, she does not want to lose her marriage; even if Jiang Qiulian can live a better life, she does not want to lose her daughter.
Their practices may be blamed, of course, can be discussed, can be blamed.
But it makes no sense to support Ge Wang and Liu Xin in this way.
The imperfection of the victim is by no means a reason for the perpetrator to be exempt from responsibility.
Moreover, their subsequent actions are one thing, and the fact that they have already happened is another, which really cannot be confused.
Freedom of expression is very useful, but it also needs to respect the facts, otherwise it can easily turn into whispers and lies.
If whispers and lies later develop into some kind of greater expressive tendency, it is indeed worrying.
At that time, I was probably not only worried about me, but also no longer vague. #Li Lianglei # #刘鑫被判赔偿江歌母亲69.6 million yuan # #我要上 headlines #
