laitimes

Please turn off cameras that invade privacy

author:Data Magazine

#Media Micro #In the tide of pan-entertainment of life, the live broadcast of the camera stretches farther and farther, poking at the boundaries of the public domain and the bottom line of the private domain again and again.

Please turn off cameras that invade privacy

For two consecutive days, Station B was pushed to the cusp of the storm, from users illegally uploading surveillance screens to doctors suspected of live broadcasting gynecological surgery, public opinion was in an uproar. Station B responded that the relevant accounts and live broadcast rooms have been banned, the police have intervened, and the case is under investigation.

The two incidents of being exposed to the sun are probably only a dime a dozen. According to the collation of netizens on social platforms, from classrooms to hospitals, from hotels to restaurants, from public places to private areas, the chaos of surveillance and live broadcasting is breaking through boundaries, and ubiquitous cameras are invading everyone's daily life.

The popularity of smart phones, coupled with the convenience of the network, makes it possible for the whole people to broadcast live, and the threshold is repeatedly lowered, just a mobile phone, you can turn the personal tea and dinner into network traffic that can absorb money, saving time and effort. What's more, driven by the psychology of curiosity, live content is often unrestricted.

Some people pretend to be crazy and stupid, and some people hunt for curiosity. Some people wantonly intrude into the lives of others in order to rub the heat, in order to increase the pink who shoots who, ignoring the feelings of the subject. Others ignore the boundaries between morality and law and reap eyeball dividends by violating strangers. Only traffic is from, no bottom line harassment, like a crazy traffic hunter.

And when live broadcasting collides with terrible voyeurism, beauty and high-level are no longer the criteria for judging, only eye-catching is supreme, and the more vulgar the picture, the more marketable.

Inside the camera, the privacy and daily life of ordinary people are mercilessly made public, and outside the camera, voyeurs are watching in dark corners. The ethics of live broadcasting collapsed, careful thinking was extremely frightening, the black industry was surging and the desire for profit was smoked.

With the help of scientific and technological accomplices, pinholes and miniature cameras flood, making "intrusion" more easy, room sockets, bathrooms, and even handbags, ties, and uppers make voyeurs invincible. Thousands of ordinary people, "naked running" in the eyes of outlaws, have become tools for profit without consciousness.

Hospitals should pay the most attention to privacy protection, is the public's reliable private place, but was "infected" by illegal cameras; as a student of a vulnerable group in society, while the monitoring is cracked, directly exposed to unknown dangers; in the increasingly hidden cameras, the privacy of the hotel is even more vulnerable.

When illegal cameras openly reach out to these places and reach out to ordinary people who have no strength, they have long exceeded the boundaries of public order and good customs, and their behavior is worse and worse every time, and the bottom line is lower than once. Black production is rampant, and it is impossible to prevent it, and the cost of safeguarding rights is often very high. Not only is it difficult for the violated person to know, but even if he does, it is difficult to find out the source of the crime, thus making the latter more unscrupulous.

In the era of entertainment to death, Truman's world is becoming a terrible reality, and even more helpless than Truman, we are almost inescapable in this reality full of cameras.

For the live broadcast of illegal and immorality, what ordinary people have to do is to consolidate their awareness of self-protection, but more importantly, it is the whole process of cracking down from platform constraints to legal supervision, the content review mechanism is more airtight, and the laws and regulations are more fist-to-flesh. Let the whole society establish a sense of boundary between live broadcasting and filming, and establish a stronger red line for the inviolable private domain. After Truman cannot be allowed to escape, the audience can still ask, "What else can I see?" (Tang Yitian)

Read on