Essay | Station B finally had an accident, and we should clap our hands
Author | Hou Xiao
The attitude of the B station staff, that is called a "gang", they are all "just" famous, who does not know the "gang" of the B station?
Usually, some people think that the content of the B station user's manuscript is illegal and report, they say that they will not deal with it if they do not deal with it, and their customer service will also clearly refuse to deal with it.
Hou Xiao reported a screenshot of the customer service dialogue with station B when he reported the user of station B
Some sensitive content, compared with the same user on the home page of each platform can be found, most other platforms dare not allow release, only B station dares to let him pass the review, and B station often recommends that kind of video to millions, tens of millions of plays, only B station is not afraid of things.
This question, in my book Ridiculous! Using self-media survey data as a reference material is purely the behavior of primary school students has been said in detail in the article, and relevant screenshots have been inserted in the article.
Screenshot of Hou Xiao's related article
There is also the problem of B station platform entanglement with others, B station or not easy to be born, once shot, will be a fierce hand.
Search for the keyword "B station lawsuit" on the Internet to see the search results full of screens, the amount of claims of B station is huge, and the winning rate of B station is relatively high.
Suing the authors in their own B-station platform has a record of claiming 1 million yuan, 20 million yuan and other amounts.
It is not that they are wrong to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests, but that they are really prestigious, so powerful that many people think that the legal affairs of Station B are "good bull forks".
The illustrations are derived from the network
No, recently Station B finally encountered an accident.
Some users uploaded a large number of video content obtained by cracking surveillance cameras on station B, which is obviously illegal, and this matter was exposed by the official media.
Screenshots of related news
Some netizens in the relevant news comment area said that they had seen these videos on the B station several months ago and had clicked on the report.
However, why has the B station platform not been processed?
Screenshot of netizen comments
Although most of the official media reports in the past two days are the announcements of the B station to respond, but don't make a mistake, don't think that the B station platform took the initiative to issue an announcement after the media reported, absolutely not so!
The first media to report on this matter was the China News Network Financial Channel, which reported on January 17.
The time when the China News Network sent this report was 21:11 on the 17th, and the time when Station B responded to Weibo was 20:00 on the 17th, it seems that the announcement of Station B was more than 1 hour earlier.
The time when B stationed the announcement on its own platform was earlier, it was 19:25.
Screenshot of the announcement issued by the official Weibo number of Station B
Screenshot of the announcement issued by the official number in the platform of Station B
Don't think that their announcement was published an hour or two earlier than the media report, which means that they consciously issued the announcement.
Please read the news report carefully, the article clearly said that it was "a netizen broke the news", not the news obtained from the announcement of station B.
As far as I know, before the media reporters want to expose the matter, they will generally interview all parties involved, need to say what the parties say, and try not to report one-sided words.
So, why the announcement of Station B was issued an hour or two earlier than the media, it is a good explanation.
The reporter called and interviewed Station B and said that he would report on the matter. They took the opportunity to tell reporters that they would deal with it accordingly and would immediately issue an announcement.
Media reporters in the report will be their announcements sent out together, the reporter in the report also omitted their own writing to the readers to convey the B station response trouble, an announcement posted into the news is finished, and the credibility is higher, the reporter is of course willing to do.
Netizens reported that they did not see the B station for several months to deal with it, and as a result, the media reporter made a phone call, and after a few hours they dealt with it, what does this mean?
When it was not exposed, the relevant content they said to pass the trial; some people reported, they said that they refused to deal with it, and the attitude was "just" very ah.
Now exposed by the media, they are processing faster than anyone.
In this way, they still feel that it is not enough, and their customer service official number also pretends to post a comment under the announcement, so that everyone can find similar content to reflect to them at any time. It's a bit disgusting to do at this time, there were months before, why did you go? Now that it has been exposed, it will be shown to everyone, is it interesting?
This shows that the meaning of Station B is: Lao Tzu is not afraid of heaven, the earth is not afraid, he is afraid of making things bigger.
Anyway, whoever wants to play legal tricks with them, their legal affairs can accompany you; whoever wants to report them wherever they go, they also accompany them, their attitude is so "rigid", but the only thing is that they are afraid of making a big deal out of it.
Screenshot of the official customer service number comment of Station B
I didn't take advantage of the recent incident about surveillance video to rub the heat, but I myself wanted to expose the virtue of Station B for a long time, but I just didn't have time.
Since everyone has been paying attention to the B station recently, I don't have time to squeeze out time to say a few words.
Originally, I was already writing speculative fiction now, and my articles are no longer mainly critical, in fact, there is no need to be troublesome. But the matter of station B, I can't help but want to say it.
Last year, I reported some vulgar accounts on station B, and station B clearly refused to deal with it, which really almost made me dizzy.
After I logged out of the account after cleaning up the APP cache of station B, in the state of not logging in (the APP of station B cannot calculate my preferences), station B recommended some spam videos to me, and almost threw me up after clicking into it.
The video comment area of those vulgar accounts is not much different from some kind of forum, and those vulgar videos have attracted a bunch of men and women to exchange sexual topics in the comment area, and the scale is particularly large.
Looking at the screenshot below, have you ever seen such a comment area on a platform other than Station B? I haven't seen it anyway.
Screenshot of a video comment area of Station B
There are also some more explosive comments, there were no screenshots at the time, and now it is estimated that they have been deleted..., and they can no longer be found.
The men and women who commented on them were clearly badly guided by the relevant video content.
There are still more authors of such videos on station B, male and female authors, and the number of such videos played on station B is relatively high, which is a type of work that is strongly supported by the platform of station B.
One of the creators with a relatively large scale, which I directly named, is an account called "Confidant Alliance".
In addition to the fact that most of the videos on his homepage are sexual topics and the scale is relatively large, there are also some videos about the beauty and lilies that conflict with laws and regulations, as well as some videos that spread the behavior of BT.
My previous article "Ridiculous! Using self-media survey data as reference materials is purely the behavior of primary school students, the authors mentioned in it are mainly this alliance of confidants. At that time, I just felt that I didn't have time to publicly hate them, so there was no roll call in that article (and now I only name this one more typical account).
Screenshot of the homepage of the Author Confidant Alliance of Station B
Screenshot of the work of the Author Confidant Alliance of Station B
The relevant regulations only allow formal sex education, sexual knowledge science, body art and other works to exist, and the video content mentioned above is really formal?
Headlines and content are rubbing the edges.
Moreover, looking at his reference data sources, he actually took the self-media survey data as reference materials, this kind of work is purely primary school student level (I really don't understand why the B station review staff like to recommend this kind of work, just appreciate this kind of work, love this kind of work, like to give traffic to support this kind of work, can it be that the B station review staff are primary school students, so they support the same kind? ）。
Many people say that Station B is a learning platform, can we just learn these things?
Normal high-quality works are sent to station B, and they are blocked at every turn, with zero recommendation. These vulgar videos, B station is recommended so positively, at every turn recommended to millions, tens of millions of plays, is this kind of content is the image of B station?
(In addition, there are other keywords related to sexual problems, everyone can go to the B station to search for a look, the search results may shock your eyeballs, here is inconvenient to take a screenshot)
Should the name of the B station platform be changed? It's better to change a veritable one...
Looking at the information of the B station recruitment review staff, it turns out that their recruitment threshold is very low, low to no limit to professional, unlimited text skills, and there is no requirement for all aspects of the level.
It is no wonder that their review staff is always limited to that level of appreciation, why normal works are always restricted, and garbage works are always recommended to millions, tens of millions of plays, which is not difficult to understand.
They do not know how to write the review staff, quality checkers, audit video is still so, when the review article is assigned traffic weight, I am afraid that I can only blind cats hit the rats, and few times can hit the accurate.
Moreover, these audit staff are also people from outsourcing companies, and the sense of responsibility and professional ethics of the staff of outsourcing companies is questionable.
Screenshot of the recruitment information of the recruitment review staff of Station B
When I reported such vulgar videos before, I actually got a reply from the customer service of Station B that I clearly refused to deal with it.
Anyway, my child, I don't dare to let him go to the B station, even if he doesn't learn badly, he will be misled by those garbage works.
B station is actually like this, I don't understand why some people play B station can also play a sense of superiority, see just from other platforms to enter the B station of the new author, just open their mouths and people to emphasize how the B station, do not know the above mentioned that kind of content, in any other platform is not so much, even if there is, will not get the support of other platforms, there will not be millions, tens of millions of plays.
Only these people feel good, in fact, the impression of B station to "outsiders" is not good, as can be seen from the comments of some netizens.
Screenshots of netizen related comments
On the Internet, you can always see some people who are unconditionally towards Station B, completely disregarding right and wrong, not discussing things, and do not know whether they have eaten several pounds of G grain from Station B.
These people, once they see who says that station B is not good, either they will raise a bar with it to protect station B, or they will scold and evaluate the people of station B with dirty words, get rid of a pair of people who have eaten the master's food, and then they will quickly wag their tails to the master, and frantically bite others to protect the master's appearance, which is a very immature performance.
If any media exposes the Confidant Alliance and other B station accounts similar to it, I dare to conclude that the B station will still come out to deal with it upside down, and immediately change the previous customer service statement, change the so-called non-violation to the violation, and delete the video.
The problem of station B has to be supervised, it has to be exposed by the media, or it is hilarious on the Internet to be willing to deal with it, otherwise they are not only unconscious, but also have a special attitude of "just" and "just" to make people angry!
Fortunately, some things can have media supervision, otherwise your B station is going to be "just" in heaven?
In general, I want to emphasize that the virtue of station B, accidents are only a matter of sooner or later, it should be so long ago, we do not have to shout injustice for station B, this time the media exposure is very beautiful, the media should continue to expose other problems of station B, I am here in advance to express support for the media.
Finally, let me explain that my future text works are mainly based on the publishing house route, as well as the reasoning game platform, and the self-media account is only used to save the first record of the work, and there is no need to worry about the retaliation of peers, so I wrote this essay as soon as possible.
If someone wants to talk to me publicly, I will accompany them.