laitimes

The old farmer claims to be the son of Puyi and Wanrong, and has been buried in anonymity for decades, expert: Your father does not have that function

As the last emperor in China's history, Puyi's life can be said to be quite legendary. He was held on the throne by Cixi and became the lord of the world at a young age, but later he was forced by the warlords to abdicate. After his abdication, in order to regain the power that belonged to himself, he did not hesitate to defect to the Japanese and established a puppet state of Manchukuo in the northeast to maintain his rule. However, all this was in vain, because the Japanese did not really regard him as emperor at all. Later, he was captured by the Soviet Union, and he angrily denounced Japanese atrocities in a military court, and was also reformed after the founding of New China, had his own identity card, had his own job, and became a legal citizen.

The old farmer claims to be the son of Puyi and Wanrong, and has been buried in anonymity for decades, expert: Your father does not have that function

In order to warn future generations, and at the same time to re-review his own sins and that period of history, he specially wrote the book "The First Half of My Life". As soon as the book was published, it sold wildly, and historians regarded it as an important research material at the end of the Qing Dynasty, and the people were better off with the private affairs of the emperor. In the book, the people also learned the story of Puyi's inability to have children and the story of Empress Wanrong's adultery with the guards.

The old farmer claims to be the son of Puyi and Wanrong, and has been buried in anonymity for decades, expert: Your father does not have that function

In 1984, a book called The Last Empress and the Imperial Princess came out. In this book, the story of Wanrong's fornication with the guards and the eventual birth of a baby girl is described in detail. It is reasonable to say that this book was written by Puyi's last wife, Li Shuxian, which is an extension of that part of history and has a strong authenticity. But an old man in Changchun openly declared: The whole book is really nonsense! Because he is the son of Puyi and Wanrong.

The old farmer claims to be the son of Puyi and Wanrong, and has been buried in anonymity for decades, expert: Your father does not have that function

As soon as this matter came out, it caused a sensation in an instant, and people questioned the authenticity of the matter, and thought that he was "eyeballing" and "rubbing heat". However, the old man named Wang Yubin believes that he is only telling the truth and is not false. According to the old man, the child that Wanrong gave birth to was not a baby girl, but a baby boy, and this child was herself. Wanrong also did not have an affair with the guards, and she was the crystallization of her love with Puyi. The reason why he is not recorded in the historical materials is that Puyi and Wanrong protect him. At the age of 3, he was made crown prince at Maojiadian, and his mother Wanrong was present at the time. Later, he was almost sent to the Soviet Union as a hostage, if stalin did not think that he was too young to replace him, he was the one who was in the Soviet Union, and his relatives and neighbors knew about it!

The old farmer claims to be the son of Puyi and Wanrong, and has been buried in anonymity for decades, expert: Your father does not have that function

However, his statement was refuted by Professor Wang Wenfeng, an authoritative researcher at the Changchun Puppet Manchu Palace Museum. Professor Wang Wenfeng was furious in the interview, and he said that he had communicated a lot with the royal family's cronies and royal family relatives in those years, and had never heard of such a slippery thing. One of the most critical pieces of evidence comes from Li Guoxiong, a bodyguard who served Puyi closely. Li Guoxiong said at that time: Due to Puyi's indulgence when he was a child, he later saw that women did not know what to do, and they had no function in that regard at all, so it was not worth refuting.

Read on