laitimes

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

introduction

In 1984, Japanese manga artist Akira Toriyama created the popular manga "Dragon Ball", which was serialized in Shueisha Shonen Manga Magazine "Shonen JUMP", and there are many bloody plots in the bloody manga "Dragon Ball", such as the battle of the Piccolo Demon King, the Saiyan attack, the battle of Namco, the artificial man who destroys the world...

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Nowadays, the generation that first watched the "Dragon Ball" comic has reached middle age, and then look at "Dragon Ball", they can often see a lot of different flavors from it, such as Sun Wukong's way of dealing with the world, Vegeta's way of survival, which is considered arrogant and arrogant, and Bulma's concept of love that abandoned her lover Yamucha for 10 years.

At first glance, I don't know what I like in the painting, and then I see that I am already the person in the painting, after everyone has seen it, you can just laugh it off, don't have to think carefully, and listen to the story.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

The other side of Goku you know and the other side of Goku you don't see

Goku's real name is Kakarot, a Saiyan on the planet Vegeta, and according to his brother Latiz, Goku is a "sweeper" who is launched to Earth to destroy the Earth for sale, while in Akira Toriyama's other works, Goku's father, Badak, randomly launched the planet Vegeta to earth to let him escape.

Regardless of whether these two statements are right or wrong, at least the fact that Goku is a Saiyan is a real hammer, and his body is shedding the blood of the fighting nation, and he is genetically belligerent, which can also be seen from his subsequent behavior.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Belligerence is not a good fight, the greatest pleasure is not to catch who tears with whom, no difference, but with high-level people to pass the trick is interesting, but to fight with high-level people, you yourself have to be at this level, so Goku practices desperately, not "hard", but his belligerent genes determine, although the brain is broken, but the genes can not be changed.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

The teachers Goku encountered were basically strange people, and the more powerful the master, the more he could learn powerful kung fu, what did he do in order to improve his ability?

Teacher Wu Tian did not agree to teach Goku Kung Fu at first, teaching can also be, he opened a condition, the turtle immortal likes to smash the sister, so he asked Goku to bring a girl to him, so, Goku really brought a girl to flatter, the turtle immortal began to preach and teach.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Goku and Kiki's marriage is also worth recalling, the marriage contract between the two people is actually a misunderstanding between each other, one did not take it seriously, one took it too seriously, and the result of the "marriage" thing, from beginning to end, Kiki took the initiative, and the first martial arts in the world would find Goku to "force marriage", and even use morality to kidnap Goku.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Goku recalled the promise of his childhood, the two people up to this time did not have any substantial emotional basis, basically similar to "finger belly for marriage", it is not too much to say "treat marriage as a joke", but Goku did not worry about it, but generously agreed to get married.

At this time, Goku did not know what marriage represented, and the reason why he agreed to it was because, on the one hand, he did not think it through, and second, the matter of marriage was not a big deal to him.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

The difference between the two people's understanding of marriage and expectations for the future has also caused different directions in the lives of the two people after marriage, and after marriage, Goku is still the same, not only working hard to train and cultivate in order to fight, but also supervising the cultivation of his son Goku, talking with Kiki and saying that it is impossible to love this kind of thing, kiki has become a fertility machine.

Why does Goku want his son Togo to cultivate? The fundamental reason is not to save the world and uphold justice, but that he himself finds fighting interesting and cultivating interesting, so he also lets his son do what he likes to do, thinking that his son will also like it.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Goku is a man who knows more about life than Goku, and after world peace, he pretends to be Superman and falls in love with Mr. Satan's daughter Bidely, he finds something he likes to do, and he is not as obsessed with fighting as his father.

Before marriage, Goku is very similar to many people in our reality, has his own obsession and like to do things, Goku is still doing his own thing after marriage, but he is very happy, he does what he likes, he does not become the way Kiki expects, he also becomes the role model of Goku, this role model is not "I do my own thing" and "not a good husband", but "be yourself".

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Only when you are truly happy can you pass on this happiness to the next generation.

Behind Vegeta, lonely pride

Vegeta, many people say that this guy is cool, very proud, as soon as the appearance of the person, there are a lot of girls on the wow, suddenly became Vegeta's little fan sister, in reality is also the case, cool unruly little bad boy has a lot of girls like.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Vegeta is very arrogant, he can't look at this or that, his earliest playmate was Ratiz, when he attacked the earth, he took Naba, when Ratiz led the bento, he didn't miss any old feelings, how could he be so hard-hearted? Why?

Because his starting point is very high, now his parents have a slogan, "Don't let the child lose at the starting line", Vegeta's father is a Saiyan king, the battle blood is excellent, the whole planet is named after him, and he will be the king in the future, which is not so simple as the rich second generation, it is simply the second generation of the king.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Born to be king, can you not be lonely? When you open your eyes, all of them are decaying rivers and mountains, what feelings can you have for the people around you? Which emperor had true feelings for the eunuchs around him? In the eyes of the king they were scum.

Vegeta lives on earth, it is really forced, helpless, first of all, Goku is stronger than him, he can't swallow this breath, vegeta if he walks no one can stop him, but he also knows that only by staying by Goku's side, he has more opportunities to improve himself.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Secondly, Vegeta still has a pedigree concept, he wants to choose the next generation, and combine with Bulma, who is the best woman on the earth, the capsule company controls the economic lifeblood of the earth, Bulma later made the time machine, and the women of Vegeta must be the best, deservedly so.

With the next generation, Vegeta has no reason to leave Earth.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

However, Goku became stronger and stronger, Vegeta never surpassed Goku, and slowly, as she survived on Earth longer and longer, Vegeta was subtly domesticated, losing herself at the same time, seemingly becoming a "righteous party", but actually becoming a tool man.

Goku only comes to him when he can't beat the demon Buo, and Vegeta himself has become aimless, if Goku wants to become stronger until the end, then what is the meaning of Vegeta's existence? This is probably the status quo for most of us, living inertia.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

But at least, live, everything is possible.

Bulma, what is love?

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

There is a shocking plot in the Dragon Ball comics where Yamucha (Leping), who has been dating for more than 10 years, breaks up with Bulma, who chooses Vegeta and gives birth to Tranx in lightning.

The reason why we are surprised is because very few people do this in reality, most people, who have been in a relationship for more than 10 years, basically get married with the mood of "living together", not only break up, but also have children out of wedlock and be a single mother, which is indeed incredible in the eyes of ordinary people.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

The period of Bulma's interaction with Yamucha (Leping) represents the love concept of the vast majority of young people, and they want a handsome boyfriend, but Shuai often can't eat it as a meal, and the Yamucha in Bulma's mouth is a scumbag, and the actual Yamucha is a fish belly.

Bulma people to middle age, only suddenly realized, only relatives can accompany, dead or alive to have children, she has this condition, rich can be enemy of the country, financial freedom, so she chose the second most powerful person on the earth, not do not want to find Goku, Bulma in that nemesis has calculated Goku, but unfortunately Goku has been married and has children.

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Tranx did not fail Bulma, the Dragon Ball comics created a halo of all "for mother" for Tranx, all the superheroes in the future world were eliminated, leaving only him and his mother Bulma, who returned to the future world after becoming stronger, Tranx eliminated artificial humans and lived happily with his mother.

When the cyborgs go on a killing spree, Tranx protects his mother for the first time.

Love will change its flavor over time, but maternal love will not. What do you think?

Is the worldview of The post-80s manga "Dragon Ball" Monkey King, Vegeta and Bulma correct?

Read on