How hard is it for a football club to rebuild?
I believe that many fans have discussed this issue to a greater or lesser extent.
Can you change the head coach? Just clean up the thorns? Or be bold, let's fire the top management together?
......
Before that, we must first understand what a club has to do before it needs to be rebuilt.
If we are only about results, then how many years does it take for a club to have no champions to rebuild?
3 years? 5 years? 10 years? 28 years? Or a long 60 years?
In fact, the length of the championship vacuum period is not the key to the problem, the key is still in the hearts of the people.
For example, whether the team's top management is satisfied with the team's current position in the league, and whether the fans are satisfied with the team's current situation.
Let's take, for example, we take the Premier League giants Manchester United as an example, why Manchester United has recently erupted in such a big civil unrest, and is ready to change the manager, the key problem is that Manchester United fans and executives are very dissatisfied with the team's performance at this stage.
Because in the eyes of the Red Devils' top brass and fans, the team is currently comparable to the All-Star squad and the background of the team's domination of the Premier League in previous years, Manchester United should now be at least in the top 4 position of the Premier League, or even sit on the same page.
Let's take a look at Serie A powerhouse Roma, have Roma's poor results this season? To be honest, it's really not the same, especially the current league rankings, which simply make the fans lose any hope.
But roma executives chose to continue to believe mourinho. No way, Roma's foundation is so thin, the last time I won the league title was at the beginning of this century, I don't believe in Lao Mu, is it another coach to continue to toss.
Let's talk about why a club has to tear down and rebuild.
- Of course, if the results are not good, they must be rebuilt.
It can only be said that it is too shallow, because a team's poor performance can be divided into several kinds, or even as many as a dozen reasons.
It can be the bankruptcy of the team, it can be the discord between the generals, it can be the infighting of the players, etc. and so on...
In general, the discord between the coach and the infighting among the players are very well handled, either by replacing the manager or removing the thorn-headed players.
But if the team goes bankrupt, then the team really needs to rebuild, and the reconstruction will only be high and not low.
Similarly, let's take an example of the same Premier League giants, Manchester United's centenary rivals Liverpool.
In recent years, the Reds have been described as "spring breeze satisfaction horseshoe rush", but many fans do not know how bad the Liverpool fans of ten years ago had a bad day:
The team owner has no ambition not to say, nothing to sell the core of the team to cash out the deficit club.
Put it this way, Liverpool were just away from bankruptcy when Gerrard moved to Chelsea.
The team is already in this situation, where should people say Liverpool should start to rebuild?
There is no doubt that such vampire bosses must be eliminated first.
In fact, just eliminating vampire bosses such as Liverpool's "dog blood double bears" will not achieve the purpose of reconstruction, because there are still a lot of relationships and moths inside a century-old Premier League club like Liverpool and Manchester United.
Therefore, when Fenway Group entered Liverpool at that time, it basically cleaned Liverpool from the inside out.
There is no shortage of reinforcement departments, renewal departments, financial departments, etc. Even fine enough for the old aunts of the canteen tossed the spoon's hand.
Of course, since every team's situation is different, the intensity of reconstruction is different from team to team.
For example, Manchester United, which is not short of money in the post-Sir Edward era, in the view of the Manchester United executives, their team reconstruction only needs to replace the head coach, so it has been using the replacement method of one coach after another to rebuild.
In fact, Manchester United's way of rebuilding is not scientific, after all, every manager has his own team building ideas, so every time Manchester United changes the head coach, the team's locker room will undergo a major change.
That is to say, the accumulation of Manchester United in the first 30 years is enough, if it is replaced by other middle-asset teams, it is estimated that the boss will have gone bankrupt and run away with his sister-in-law.
Therefore, if a team wants to rebuild, it must start from the roots completely, up to the team owner and team management, down to the head coach and players.
In fact, even with such a clean rebuild, most Clubs in Europe will still be caught in a cycle of rebuilding.
We still take mourinho's current Roma team as an example, don't look at the Roma team is now down to the fans, up to the top all unprecedented unity to support the old Mu, in fact, the Roma top level has been in the game, because the debt-ridden they have no way out, the bet is the right salted fish to turn over, the bet lost continues to sink, and even never emerge.
This is the biggest problem the team encountered in the reconstruction process: the predecessor dug a pit.
Under normal circumstances, as long as the team is not bankrupt, then the team still has the opportunity to rebuild, as short as three or five years, as long as the managers no longer lose the club, they can drag the team on the right track.
I am afraid that the former manager of the team will dig a pit that cannot be filled in a lifetime for the latecomers, then the team will be completely finished.
So when will a manager help the team rebuild?
To be precise, it is after the team is dragged on track by the managers (the team can only rely on the income of the fans and the share of the team to achieve self-financing), because only at this time, as a head coach, can be fully tailored to the existing personnel of the team.
Of course, due to the uneven level of the original personnel of the club, it is essential for the team to carry out a major change of blood, and some managers will even ask the team's senior management to replace the existing personnel by 80%.
At this time, the team reconstruction work is undoubtedly the most test of the decision-making ability of the team managers, because the team's big change often requires a lot of existing funds, and the bet is right in the clubhouse... bah! The salted fish turned over, and if the bet was lost, it had to be torn down and started.
Far from it, or continue to say Manchester United, Manchester United has been rebuilding for more than 8 years since the retirement of Sir, calculated, has wasted a full 8 years of time, and now it has to be torn down and restarted.
There is no doubt that Manchester United's managers have been stuck in management decision-making for all these years.
In fact, even if the team's top management meets the requirements of the head coach and makes a major change of team personnel, the team still has to go through a lot of pain.
Many of them include the concentrated outbreak of player injuries, the run-in period of player coaching, and the trough of team status, which are the main factors that can affect the team's performance.
At this stage, it is undoubtedly the moment when the club management needs the most patience, and whether the team can complete the reconstruction is a big move.
Therefore, in the view of this iron, the reconstruction of a team is itself a complex and lengthy process, and the proportion of team managers here is often less than 30%.
Whether a team can complete the reconstruction mainly depends on the decision-making ability of the team manager at a critical moment.