The New Year's Eve has passed, but probably no one has "happy to read" to cross the difficult and dramatic step.
In just 49 hours and 14 minutes, the "Happy Reading Lesson" encountered a series of roller coasters:
Go online, squeeze, take down.
QWhat is Happy Reading?
A: It is actually an app, the full name is "Happy Reading Excellent Class", parents can choose courses for their children on it. "Happy reading" is known as the "vest" of learning and thinking, because the teachers above are mostly self-learning and thinking, and the class type also follows the learning and thinking. Therefore, what so many people grab is not a novice music to read, but an old school to learn and think.
How exciting is it to grab a class at Happy Reading?
A well-informed friend of mine pulled me through the experience.
On December 28, he said to me: "Chang Dad, happy reading can grab the class, and think about the standard!" ”
On December 29, he told me: "Happy reading is crowded, grab the class quickly, and the hand is slow." ”
On December 30, he said to me: "Happy reading collapsed, can not register and pay, have you grabbed the class?" ”
I replied, "No. ”
Friends don't know if it's really relieved or secretly sorry for me, but just said: "That's just fine, now that the APP is off the shelves, the search can't be found." ”
……
The reason why it was suddenly taken down at the hottest time, all parties are also divided: the parent group said that it was "reported"; Leyu himself said that it was because the system was faulty and needed to be upgraded and optimized, and the news said:
It is really to listen to the words of the king, as to listen to the words of a seat.
Although as of today, the Leyu APP has not been re-listed, it has made another announcement because the previous tuition price has been set high - so they have reduced the guide price to 22 yuan per lesson. My friends who successfully signed up before have received a refund one after another, this storm seems to be able to end, the children can immediately have classes, steadfast learning, right?
But I really think, not necessarily. Wave after wave of unevenness has risen again, and what reasons will be removed or reported after reading it has now begun to see.
With the sword hanging above his head, it was difficult to cross the thunder pool one step
This week I saw a screenshot of a chat that made parents indignant.
That's right, still familiar smell: parent reports.
The background is that the parents of this bully did not grab the S+ class for their children, so they publicly published this statement in the official group, which was identified by parents as "Happy reading was removed from the shelves, and there is a 'credit' of TA".
After the double reduction, the operation reported by parents has been seen strangely. Not long ago, Chang Dad was confused about the parents, forcing the teachers into what kind! The article severely criticizes the scum parents who say that "their children do not learn, nor let other people's children learn", saying that they are simply possessed by crab spirits, and they are harmful to others and themselves.
But this time the report is slightly different, this time it is the parents of the bully to report.
"I can't get on and let others continue to go up? What beautiful things do you want? ”
"Learning and thinking about this kind of teaching and training is the most beneficial to those of us who study well."
"When the class starts, I'll take a look." S+ is not super-program, dare to over-program? Grandmother! ”
Among the words, there is no shortage of threats and intimidation, mixed with the coldness and ridicule from the parents of the school bully. Especially the last sentence, "It's nothing, just a child who has money to teach, is it bad to sweep the street?" Why not live", the mouth is vicious, and the heart is even darker to the extreme.
Just because their children did not successfully register, other children could not learn;
Just because their children have good academic performance, they will block the channel for other children to improve their grades;
Just because their children have won the award, they have to report the competition with their backhand, so that other children will never have the opportunity to compete with them;
Just because their children have not learned informatics, they want to report informatics when it is useful for further education, so that those children who have learned will be white;
Just because you want your own children to win the competition, you have to stomp other children under your feet...
I don't want to use more ugly words to describe this handful of garbage, but for a moment, I was a little distressed, sad for the child who was protected. Heartbroken and ignorant, he grew up under this deformed view of education and values.
The limit for small classes is 35 people, and the capacity of large classes is unlimited (it is also said that it is 1000 or 2000 people). This means that there will be people who can't report to the small class.
If every parent who fails to sign up has to hold the revenge psychology of "I can't learn, you don't want to learn", then it is not possible to read happily, but 100% to stop cooking.
What's more, in addition to the reason that "children can't learn", parents can report a variety of reasons:
The charging price exceeds the guide price, report!
Class time exceeds the regulations, report!
The teaching content is beyond the outline, report!
Without waiting for the government to intervene, these discipline-based training institutions will probably take the initiative to withdraw from the position because they are too troublesome and too afraid.
Even if they insist on staying trembling, most of the children will not learn well.
Elite training has become mass tuition, is it still necessary to learn?
Before I gave Xiao Xiao often a course of learning and thinking, I did not expect him to participate in any competition or what results, but simply felt that he did not have enough to eat in class, and wanted him to contact Xiao Ao, enlighten his thinking, and broaden his horizons. Because it is different from the classroom, Xiao Xiao is often very interested.
And this time of happy reading, friends urged me to sign up, but I did not forget to grab, nor did I not grab, but I did not plan to report from the beginning. In the eyes of many people, happy reading is a substitute for "learning and thinking". However, in the current policy and environment, the four words of "no super-outline" alone determine that happy reading cannot become another learning and thinking at all.
First of all, the number of happy reading classes is almost not capped, there is no opportunity to interact with the main teacher, there is no tutor to help students, the lecture is fast and slow, whether the child can understand, the teacher does not know, what is the difference between this and the students' own transcription of the broadcast?
Even if it is a small class of 35 people (to be honest, 35 people is already a large class in my eyes). Does the content of the lesson have to be suitable for each child?
Happy courses can be divided into A, A+, S, S+ courses. A and A+ are regular courses, while S and S+ courses are elevated courses. Even if you really sign up for the S and S+ courses and can continue to learn the super program content, can you guarantee that there will be no previous parental reports that cannot be reported, and you will always be able to be stable?
If, as expected, it was reported, Ley reading would have to revise the handouts. Whether the teacher can still teach with peace of mind and whether the child can still learn steadily is an unknown.
If you don't want to read it, you have to reduce the difficulty. In fact, Lele Reading seems to have started to do this. Some successful parents receive a portion of the A and A+ lessons with a calculation workbook.
After seeing it, many parents were disappointed - the difficulty of the fourth grade was similar to that of the previous third grade. If the whole class type is the same number of paths, the advantage of "multi-level hierarchical teaching", the biggest highlight before learning and thinking, may be difficult to reproduce.
At this point, the parent who shouted the report was quite reasonable:
"It is useless not to learn beyond the program - delay time, learning scum is also white - learning is also white learning, or nothing."
The same is the learning content in the syllabus, the child can not learn in school, and the make-up lesson is estimated to have little effect;
In another case, the child learns well in school, and it is unnecessary to make up the same again, although the price is low, but it is a waste of time, and the child's time is the most precious.
Just like Xiao Xiaochang, with this time, it is better to let him read more, do exercises, or play for a while to be more realistic.
In addition to the decline in the difficulty of the course and the reduction of tuition fees, Happy Reading will also face a huge problem, that is, how to ensure high-quality teaching standards, how to retain talented teachers, and how to keep the company running normally.
As we all know, the cost of lessons is high, and the salaries of teachers are also very high. Because of this, Learning and Thinking can attract a group of teachers with high teaching quality.
The "non-profit" nature of Leyu means that it can't be too profitable. Making less money means that it is difficult to retain talents.
So to say two more words, I have colleagues who said that the former Xueersi teachers now choose to go it alone, but the price for parents is much higher than the tuition fee of Xueersi before.
This situation is understandable, but I also want to remind everyone that without the strong teaching and research team and monitoring system behind Xueersi, the individual workshop will still have to put a question mark in the future in the systematicness, professionalism and control of the direction of the discipline.
To summarize:
Fear of being reported by parents, teachers can not exceed the program;
Large class teaching, the teacher can not exceed the outline;
Fees are reduced, and the quality of teachers is difficult to guarantee.
conclusion:
Even if happy reading returns, it is likely that it will not become the previous "learning and thinking".
Therefore, parents who have not grabbed the class do not need to worry at all. In fact, not only happy to read, most of the subject training classes will encounter similar problems, in the changeable education policies and complex social environment, we are facing the "want to improve points, extracurricular classes" of the old yellow calendar!
It is said that the child's learning now mainly "depends on the parents", but in my opinion, the parent's task is not to be a teacher who teaches him general knowledge (we do not have this ability), but to be a coach who teaches him how to learn.
Because cultivating internal skills and improving children's own learning ability is the perfect way to enable them to settle down in this world in the future and "respond to all changes with no change".
Learning ability, referred to as learning ability, not only refers to the child's ability to face textbooks and tests in school, but also the ability to absorb new knowledge, apply it and innovate, which is a comprehensive ability.