Reporter Jia Yanfeng reported that after Dalian people were forced to draw 1-1 by Chengdu Rongcheng on the afternoon of the 8th, many things happened, among which the news that attracted widespread attention was that "if the team is relegated, Wanda will quit". In response, the club replied, "There were no claims that the group was going to withdraw. ”
Although it is not from the official media, it still touches the sensitive nerves of many people, and the anger on the bench of the Dalian people team has also been linked to this rumor. On the morning of the 9th, the reporter asked the club management for verification, and the reply was: "We are just waiting for a unified share reform plan, at least in the club management, there is no statement that the group wants to withdraw." We don't know where the outside world's news comes from. ”
The club's statement denied this statement to a certain extent, in fact, at this time, the news came out, the most affected should be the players, once the players are worried that the team will be disbanded due to relegation, or have other concerns, then the final embodiment is the mood and mentality in the game. The preparation of a game cannot be only at the technical and tactical level, but multifaceted.
After a whole night of contemplation after the game, dalian people's emotions have calmed down a bit. For some problems that they could not understand before, they also had some clearer understanding.
Although Dalian Renren Club did not invest much this season, it was able to do not owe wages from the beginning of the year to the end of the year, and the first stage also persevered under so many difficulties, although the leaders of Wanda Group did not appear in the team to cheer up, but the things that should be done were done, Larson was found, Danielson was found back, And Janison was really unable to find back. As far as the configuration of dalian people is concerned, relegation is enough, but Jose has lost everything with a wrong move, and finally everyone has to face this consequence together.
There are no ifs in football matches, but if Sun Guowen knew that the action would have such consequences, he would certainly not have wanted to leave the field in this way. The reporter contacted Sun Guowen, who said that in fact, it is not as complicated as the outside world speculates, that is, the key stage of relegation is more sensitive, so it is not convenient for him to say anything. The club also said that Sun Guowen has played too many games throughout the season, carried too much pressure, and there is always a time when a person can't bear it, so far, the club has not given Sun Guowen too much harsh responsibility.
What caused the Dalian people to lose control of their emotions was inseparable from several controversial penalties in the second half, of which the most critical were three: the first was that in the 59 minutes, Tao Qianglong and Chengdu Rongcheng No. 27 Liu Bin had a pulling action in the confrontation, Tao Qianglong fell to the ground in the penalty area, the Dalian players on the field thought it was a penalty, and the referee awarded a free kick outside the penalty area line; the second was that in the 83rd minute, Chengdu Rongcheng's Gan Chao fouled Zhao Jianbo for lifting his foot too high, and the referee only gave Gan Chao a yellow card, and the Dalian people thought it should be a red card The most controversial is whether Liu Ruovan had a handball in the 75th minute, because it involves whether Dalian people should eat a penalty.
For these three penalties, the industry insiders have made such a professional interpretation -
First of all, Tao Qianglong's fall to the ground, should he give Dalian a penalty? Industry insiders commented: "First of all, this is a continuous foul action, Chengdu team defender No. 27 is not fouled in the penalty area, but from outside the penalty area has been pulling and pulling fouls on Dalian No. 24 players, but Dalian players have not fallen outside the penalty area, but the center of gravity has been unstable and unbalanced, so after completing the passing action, he fell in the penalty area, and the player who fell on the other side pressed Tao Qianglong's heel, which is also one of the important reasons for Tao Qianglong's fall." If referee Li Haixin blew this action to stop at the first time of the foul, it would not involve the problem of falling to the ground in the back penalty area, but if you look back at the first half of 4 minutes and 30 seconds, the No. 22 (Dong Yanfeng) team member of the Dalian people's team against the Chengdu No. 9 (Silva) player's two-handed waist defense was not blown to stop, thus ensuring that the Chengdu team completed an offensive shot in the favorable situation of attack and continued the continuous control of the two penalties, you can understand: First, the referee pursues the unity of scale. Second, if the defender does not cause serious physical damage to the attacking team and the offensive side benefits the result is not affected, there will be no yellow card, so dalian no. 22, although there is a very exaggerated defensive action of hugging and falling, but the reason for not receiving a yellow card is here. Tao Qianglong did not benefit from this defense, so after the attack was terminated, the referee gave a set-piece, which was a very correct penalty. There is no penalty, because if it is not considered that Tao Qianglong may have broken into the box to complete the offensive shot at that time, the referee can completely prevent this confrontation from the first moment of the two sides pulling, and there will be no subsequent misunderstandings. From the perspective of scale uniformity, the referee's decision is very accurate. ”
The second controversy, Chengdu team Gan Chao's foul on Zhao Jianbo, should he be red carded? The expert replied: "You can give a red card, but there is no problem in giving a yellow card." Why? Still in accordance with the principle of scale unification, in the 19th minute of the first half, Dalian's No. 11 player (Sun Guowen) had the same foul action against Chengdu's No. 39 (Gan Chao), the referee should consider that the game has just begun, and no. 11 has a certain foot-closing action, so he was given a yellow card, and the Second Half Chengdu Team No. 39 player is also a similar action, so it is very correct to give a yellow card for the principle of scale unification. If the referee is more severe, you can also directly use the dangerous move as a reason to send the foul player straight red, that is to say, Dalian people will start with one less No. 11 player, if this action is straight red from the beginning, then the No. 39 of the Chengdu team behind is also straight red. ”
The third controversy is whether Liu Ruovan is handball. The answer given by experts is: "Because of the angle factor of the broadcast lens, the broadcast screen cannot give a very clear answer, but we can analyze the whole process." First, after Dalian's No. 7 (Zhao Xuri) had an obvious penalty foul on Chengdu's No. 6 (Feng Zhuoyi), the VAR video referee stepped in, prompting the referee to watch the action before this action, that is, Dalian's No. 7 kicked the ball up, just as Chengdu Team No. 8 (Liu Ruovan) caught up, and the ball looked like a handball. If the ball is handball, then there is no penalty at the back, and if it is not a handball, it must be a penalty in the back. The referee and the video referee watched it repeatedly and decided that it was hit the abdomen of the No. 8 player that such a penalty would be made. Until more other evidence is revealed, we should trust the referee's decision. ”