laitimes

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

The Lakers today to 115-122 defeated the Nets, suffered five consecutive defeats, after the game people talked about the Lakers' loss is also a lot of discussion, ridicule, ridicule, all kinds of criticism, the so-called famous mouths in the United States, Zhan Hei is more out of the criticism of this, scolding that, the Lakers are caught in the vortex of anger criticism, look at the paper lineup, the Lakers have James and Westbrook double giants, the Nets only Harden single-core team, bench depth, lakers are not bad This Nets remnant.

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

However, everyone agreed that the Lakers lost today, but James did not lose, why say so, look at James's data, James played 40 minutes, shot 14 of 25 shots, shot 9 of 3 three-pointers, grabbed 9 rebounds, they also had 7 assists, 3 steals, 1 block, the whole game cut 39 points, plus or minus +9, the whole team only James is positive, everyone else is negative.

James in a drift projection on the left, for the year-end war wonderfully opened the curtain, and then Tucker, Johnson hit the basket, Howard chiseled an axe under the basket, the rest is James to kill in and out, a horse to lead, James 3 consecutive breakthroughs to the basket, even shots with free throws to cut 6 points, and then James a three-point hundred step through Yang, the first quarter James played a wind and water, domineering.

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

In the second quarter, James led Munch, Westbrook, Anthony and Collison to start the game, Munch came up and hit a three-pointer to open up the territory for the Lakers, Westbrook a dragon from the backcourt to the frontcourt, picked a basket successfully, the Lakers blasted out a wave of 7-0 opening, next, it was James's performance, James was a middle shot, and another breakthrough, and another free throw, consecutive scores, and finally James also played a 2+1, when James walked to the free throw line, the Lakers home fans could not help but shout MVP, James in the crowd of calls, The ball is scored steadily.

Easy side to fight again, James or start the game, Ellington came up to work, a three-point shot, the Lakers will chase the score to only 1 point, Anthony hit the iron while it was hot, the arc top opened his hand to hit a three-point hit, the Lakers contacted 2 three-pointers, the score was reversed, James in the middle of the road, added 2 points, 5 minutes and 8 seconds James basket strong attack, a dozen or two to send the ball into the basket, but, on the other hand, the net, but the offensive tide is higher than a wave, a wave of connection, playing a combination of inside and outside, more points of blossoming, three quarters of the battle, The Lakers trailed by a full 20 points 82-102.

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

In the last quarter, the Lakers were not discouraged, did not give up, but rearranged the troops, began to counterattack, Munch appeared on the scene and even cut 5 points, James a three-point icing on the cake, Tucker and Anthony also both shot horses to kill, left and right two ribs inserted knives, Munch is more and more accurate, and then hit a three-pointer, James veteran Huang Zhong more and more fierce, and another three-point line to shoot, but also a "Zhan An line", Mills a three-point shot to kill the game, James a three-point response, the Lakers from the cliff back, Unfortunately, in the last 1 and a half minutes, the Lakers' defense line was broken, the Nets advanced, the Lakers were defeated, and finally the Lakers lost 115-122!

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

After the game, Lakers coach David Fitzdale was interviewed and asked about the Lakers' process from falling behind by a large score to a draw in the last quarter, and Fitzdale thought that harden's defense was very successful, which he was very satisfied with.

Asked why James played so well and lost, Fitzdale said: "This damn list sucks. ”

Fitzdale said that the loss blamed this bad list, meaning that the lack of soldiers, had to use two 10-day short contract players, meaning that Fitzdale thinks that he is a smart woman, and a smart woman is difficult to cook without rice, so why did Howard only play for 6 minutes, why not use Jordan Jr., Rondo? Fitzdale wanted to throw the pot, but he wasn't smart enough, there were so many players on the bench who didn't have to, who was to blame?

James played at the peak of 39+9, why did the Lakers still lose? Fitzdale's throwing pot is very clever!

Read on