With the news that Wei Ya was fined 1.341 billion yuan for tax evasion was exposed, the focus of the entire network audience shifted from Wang Lihong to Wei Ya, Wei Ya's husband and Li Jiaqi, and the three of them invariably appeared on the hot search list.
Via apologized, Via's husband apologized, and it was reasonable. Via said: Wrong is wrong, and I am willing to bear all the consequences for my mistake.
Via's husband said: No matter what you say, it has been a big mistake, and I apologize to the users who have always trusted and supported us! I will always accompany Via through her most difficult moments.
The two apologized, acknowledged the facts, and faced the consequences. In particular, Via's husband, who dares to recognize reality, always stands behind Via. Such behavior has been supported by some netizens.
The online author named "Appreciation Meter" publicly praised Wei Ya's husband for his responsibility and reprimanded Wang Lihong for being a soft egg. He said: Wei Ya evaded taxes and evaded taxes, and the national fine has nothing to say, but we have a saying, Wei Ya's husband let us see that there is not only a soft egg like Wang Lihong in the world, but also a good man with responsibility like Wei Ya's husband. The first meaning of men is to be strong, we must find a man with masculinity, Wang Lihong, guinea pig ears, in the middle of the look is not useful ah.
Such a view is a bit of a steal of the concept. Wang Lihong's private life is chaotic and morally corrupt is a problem, Wei Ya's evasion of taxes, and her husband's unshirkable responsibility is also a problem, and their harm to society is far greater than Wang Lihong.
Leaving aside the problem, it is not correct to talk only about the responsibility of being a man.
If you really want to talk about men's responsibilities, Li Jiaqi is worth talking about.
After Wei Ya's accident, some media interviewed Li Jiaqi, and his response was: We are honest and responsible. We run everything normally.
Shouldn't the same public figures who are law-abiding and have good conduct be exaggerated?