This article was originally from the WeChat public account "Pickpocket" ID: bapo818. Please do not reprint without permission. However, everyone is welcome to forward the article to the circle of friends Oh, Mo Mo Da.
Disney's path is getting wilder.
Following the "blue eyes and fair skin" of the little mermaid, she became a small flounder with dark eyes and wide eyes
And Snow White, whose skin is as white as snow and her lips as red as blood (it can be said that anyone knows that Snow White must be white), has become a Latino-looking "Brown Snow Princess"
Disney has given another disruptive visual crit to poor viewers who are getting more and more difficult.
After watching it for a moment, you will feel that what kind of flounder or brown snow princess, that is not a thing.
The Disney princess who was innovated this time is Princess Belle in "Beauty and the Beast".
Romantic and beautiful to the point of being surreal, fairy tales require that the male and female protagonists be different from ordinary people.
Princess Belle in the fairy tale is set up as intellectually beautiful, intelligent and elegant, and very kind.
Because of her beauty, she can attract the prince (starting from the appearance is the first element, if fairy tale love does not look at the face, it is still called a fairy tale).
Because of her cleverness, she was able to communicate with the prince who had become a beast from a tit-for-tat confrontation at the beginning to a later acquaintance.
Because of her kindness, she will become the hero of the prince and save the prince from the curse of becoming an ugly beast.
As an audience who has seen all kinds of unpleasantness and regrets in reality, what is the picture of watching fairy tales?
Of course, the picture is all the beauty that cannot be appreciated in reality, such as appearance, such as love, such as consummation.
The fairy tale movies of the new era can be innovative, but no amount of innovation can replace the core content that the audience really likes.
Emma Watson's version of "Beauty and the Beast" is a good change.
Although the heroine gives the character her personal favorite "independence" element, the main core of the whole story has not changed, and the appearance of the protagonist is also in line with the aesthetic orientation of the audience.
Beautiful maiden in the iconic yellow princess dress
With love and wisdom and courage, the ugly-looking beast was restored to its original appearance.
The moment the prince regains his handsome appearance and embraces Princess Belle, it is the value of our audience spending money to buy tickets.
To put it bluntly, fairy tales are inseparable from handsome men and beautiful women.
Especially in the Disney Princess series, the prince is just an embellishment, and the princess is the big heroine, and it is also the soul of the story.
If the fairy tale heroine hadn't looked good, the story wouldn't have been true from the start.
If Snow White is not good-looking, why should the Queen's queen mother be so jealous that she wants to kill her? Isn't it good to let the ugly girl set off her beauty at home every day?
If Princess Belle was not good-looking, how could the lonely prince, who had been turned into a beast, choose her to accompany her to stay in the castle.
Isn't that what you say?
But look at Princess Belle in the latest musical version of Beauty and the Beast
Jed Jones.
A "plus-size queer black woman" (the concept of "queer" refers to all expressions of non-existence in culture. This category includes both gay, lesbian and bisexual positions, as well as all other underlying, non-categorical and non-categorical positions. ）
Looking at the introduction, you can see that the identity of this superimposed multiple buff is very invincible, encompassing almost all the popular political correct elements in recent years.
but.
Identity is invincible, to that station, is the right incarnation.
But you tell me.
Princess Belle in the fairy tale looks like this??
This 250-pound black girl, standing with the prince, is the painting style of interpreting "Beauty and the Beast"?
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to change the name to "World of Warcraft"?
For this bold use of 250 pounds of black plus-size cool children's stars as the heroine of "Beauty and the Beast".
That's how Disney explained it
Casting "breaks all standards" (good standards, why break?). ）。
Subvert the traditional image of Disney princesses as "white and thin". (We viewers love to watch, why subvert?) ）
Disney also said that Jed Jones was chosen to embody the idea that "beauty encompasses all weight, body type, and skin color."
The director said that Bell, played by Jones, is a fierce, intelligent and vulnerable character.
To match Jones's own temperament
The director also painstakingly found an actor who lost a leg due to cancer to play the Prince of Beasts (meaning that the sky is broken?). ）。
The reason sounds full of positive energy.
The heroine Jones herself expressed her excitement and excitement.
Saying that playing Bell is his dream wish.
Now it's finally come true and I'm playing Disney Princess.
Available emmm.
She was a dream come true.
But who cares about the audience's feelings?
There really isn't any sense of skin color discrimination/weight discrimination/appearance discrimination, and I ask myself if I am a person who is quite politically correct and always introspects to avoid making mistakes.
Objectively speaking, this black little sister is very talented in music, singing is really good, if she plays any role that suits her, I will appreciate her performance, no matter how heavy, what she looks like, she has the strength and right to shine.
But she is really neither princess Belle in the original fairy tale, nor is she the beautiful princess in the audience's heart.
Now in order to force artistic correctness, it is already necessary to ignore the character and content settings of classic works, and change the core to the point of being completely inconsistent to meet the trend?
Saying that it is to break all discrimination is also another kind of aesthetic bullying?
I always like to buckle the big hat and say that the audience is biased against skin color and physical appearance.
A little bit of lust added to the sin.
Don't viewers understand the beauty of all skin tones?
Princess Jasmine's skin is not white at all, and she is very queen, and the audience loves her to the point of no return, saying that she satisfies all the fantasies of the audience about the princess.
The same is true of Mulan, the failure of the movie version is one thing, and Mulan's popularity as an Asian princess with a force value max is also quite high in the Disney Princess series.
As long as it is really good-looking, as long as the actor can fit the role, the audience will also have eyes to see.
On the contrary, from the perspective of the recent "reverse casting", it is clear that the audience's aesthetic orientation and due rights have been partially deprived.
The audience is not allowed to not accept the little black flounder, but to let the audience replace the mermaids in the fairy tale world with the dirty pigtails from the African coastline.
The audience is not allowed to accept the brown snow princess who is not white or beautiful, and even Snow White will not be allowed to leave a white skin.
Now I ask everyone to believe that the 250-pound queer black woman is the beautiful girl in the fairy tale who makes the beast prince fall in love at first sight.
Who the hell is overdoing it?
Who is the worse?
I pinched my fingers and calculated, plus-size queer black women, these buffs have also reached the peak of the universe.
I don't know what room for Disney can make progress next time when it is forced to break through?
Thinking of this, I suddenly broke the jar and fell into curiosity.
▼
Entertainment is a circle (juan)
We don't blow or be reasonable