I have something to say about the term "manager"

I have something to say about the term "manager"

Recently, the leader in charge arranged a job, belongs to the legacy project, the new section chief who does not take it, as a running errands section member, this task fell gorgeously on my body, in fact, I and the leader in charge have expressed clearly, this business I have not handled, how to do it, but also need to be in charge of the leader to take advice, and explain what to do next, (as a staff, I should find a way to solve this matter, but really not within the scope of their responsibilities, And the leader in charge is actually clear about everything) But the leader in charge just pretends not to know, and asks you what to do next, I see that the signs are not right, and say that I am just running errands, how did this matter fall on me? But the leader can only take a roundabout tactic, asked the leader in charge of this project (no longer in charge of this department), only to know that in fact, there is no problem with this project, that is, it is shelved in the middle, and there has been no payment. After I have a number in mind, I can do this with confidence.

But maybe I think it's too simple, when the invoice is reimbursed, you need to sign the manager, and it is difficult for a while. What is a manager? I searched Baidu, the manager is the person directly responsible for handling something, and the auditor is the superior of the manager, which is used to review the work of the manager and confirm it. The manager is the proposer and handler of the incident in the department, and the things done by the manager must be checked by the supervisor above. This is the common name of the business process of the government department, it is only a stage name and the name of the person handling the business process. Moreover, the manager is not a legal term, there is no legal interpretation, and it is an irregular name in the legal sense, which is usually understood as a person who handles business specifically. In the case where both the leader and the manager sign the invoice, the person responsible should be the leader, not the manager. The manager is only the person who handles the matter, and the person responsible should be the leader.

In addition, the legal responsibilities that the agent needs to bear for signing are as follows:

1. Prove that the agent has received the payment, and the specific circumstances of the collection are as written on the receipt.

2. The manager only bears responsibility for the unit and does not bear responsibility for the outside world, so if it is misappropriated, occupied, or embezzled, the unit has the right to recover compensation, which constitutes a crime and is investigated for criminal liability according to law.

3. The unit where the manager is located shall bear legal responsibility for the receipt.

All in all, when the agent signs, you have to make sure it's legal and not illegal. Under the premise of ensuring this, it is you who handle it (even if the leader forcibly assigns you the task at the time), and indeed you need to sign it at the manager. As for responsibility, you are only responsible for your responsibilities in the process. Draw the point, can not break the law! Can't break the law! Can't break the law!