In the mobile phone industry, curved screens have always been the representative of high-end flagships because of their high cost technology and broad visual effects. But have you found that in the past two years, curved screens have not been so hot, and even gradually have a trend of withdrawing from the market, why is this?
The first point: the iPhone never uses a curved screen, the cost is too high
iPhone is recognized in the mobile phone circle big brother, but no matter how the Android curved screen flagship is promoted, it has always never used a curved screen, and the most considered goods are the cost of the curved screen. As the saying goes: cheng also Xiao He defeated Xiao He, curved screen because of high-end is liked by some users, but for mobile phone manufacturers, how to balance costs, prices and profits, as well as consumer capabilities, market competition, etc., is a big problem. The reason why Apple has not raised prices in the past two years, cost control is of course the most important, the charger has been reduced, and the curved screen can of course be saved.
The second point: the appearance is good, but the experience is lacking
In addition, although the curved screen extends the screen picture, there is a rounded curvature, and the appearance looks good, but the actual experience is actually lacking. Many curved screen mobile phone screen edge position image quality is distorted, the clarity is reduced, and most APP software will not specifically adjust the adapted interface for different curvatures, which leads to a slight imbalance in the size of the interface, and the experience effect is not good. And the side part of the hypersurface extension, everyone will not really turn the phone to the side to watch, at most the afterglow glance, it is easy to touch in the hand, and the operation is inconvenient.
The third point: fragile, and the maintenance cost is too high
In addition, the curved screen covers the side of the mobile phone in a large area, and in the case of accidental situations such as falling and bumping, the screen is the most likely to bear the brunt of damage. And this kind of accident in the use of the process is inevitable, when the curved screen is broken, because of its high cost, the price of maintenance is naturally expensive, which is the curved screen user has to face and bear the risk. Although most users will pack an anti-collision shell and tempered film for the love machine, the curved screen is still not as tightly wrapped as the direct face screen, which is also a fact.
The fourth point: micro-surfaces replace large surfaces, taking into account both aesthetics and experience
Finally, since the curved screen and the direct-faced screen have their own advantages and disadvantages, so balance the two, some mobile phone manufacturers will compromise the introduction of micro-surfaces to replace large surfaces. And look at the Xiaomi Mi 11 curvature is smaller than the Xiaomi Mi 10, the Honor 60 curvature is only 58 degrees, etc., they are no longer along the 88 degrees of huawei's former road of hyper-curvature, but they all take into account the aesthetics and visual and feel of the experience effect. I have to say that this compromise is still more practical, better, and more in line with the user's taste.
In short, whether it is a curved screen or a straight screen, it is applied to the mobile phone, that is, to serve the mobile phone, to serve the user, the cost price is high, the price is cheap, and it is always necessary for consumers to pay for the market. So super curved, micro-curved, direct-faced screen mobile phone, which one do you prefer?