laitimes

The Ministry of Finance has spoken out against it: the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated! What about lenovo problems?

author:Sima Nan

Text/Sima Nan

Someone must be unable to sleep tonight.

The Ministry of Finance has spoken out against it: the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated! What about lenovo problems?

The news published by the Beijing Daily will make many people frightened.

The latest spirit of the Ministry of Finance has only one sentence, and the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated.

Isn't that a hassle to explain?

Take it and give it back to me!

Spit it out for me when you eat it!

Bring it into your pocket and pull it out for me!"

Pretending to be fair, ostensibly going through all the procedures, including appraisal and listing, but suspected of the loss of huge amounts of state-owned assets, the seemingly fair skin should be peeled off to restore the original appearance of the thief.

Regarding lenovo's restructuring in 2009, Oceanwide Holdings cut away 29% of the shares suspected of loss of state-owned assets, this matter has been noisy for more than 20 days, many people pricked their ears, highly concerned about the news from the official. "People's Daily" talked about entrepreneurship two days ago, and yesterday's Xinhua News Agency specifically cited some examples of patriotic dedication, innovation, honesty and trustworthiness of entrepreneurs, including Ren Zhengfei.

The latest document released by the Ministry of Finance is so far the most in line with the official spirit of this matter, the wording is simple, cut to the point, the core is a sentence: the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated.

This sentence is so powerful that all the things that people have been talking about for more than 20 days, the documents of the Ministry of Finance are in a word.

All that's left is a concrete analysis.

People will ask, if Liu Chuanzhi and others cause the loss of state-owned assets, should they compensate them?

People will ask, Yang Yuanqing borrowed billions from the bank in the position of Lenovo executive, and then used the money to buy Lenovo's shares, is this reasonable or unreasonable?

People will ask whether the superficially reasonable transfer of state-owned assets is actually secretly entrusted to the private sector and secretly manipulated, so should we restore the original appearance of the matter today?

People will ask, since the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated, think of this matter, what is the specific compensation method? How much do you have to pay? Can't get the money, just lie down, what to do?

……

I believe that many people are like needles and felts, and they do not have the courage to face these problems.

Recently, there is an evil trend that no matter how much correct nonsense they tell, they always have to reveal a meaning in the cracks of the word, entrepreneurs should not be prosecuted, victors should not be prosecuted, and the law must turn a corner when it encounters so-called entrepreneurs, otherwise it is populism, it is a movement, it is wg, it is counter-reform.

There is a magazine that has done more excessively, they fake the leader's speech, tout lenovo in 2009 to transfer 29% of the shares to Oceanwide is the sunshine restructuring, the article was published not 10 minutes, it was exposed by netizens a bottom, this is also too explicit, right? In the history of Chinese journalism, such public falsification of leaders' speeches is rare.

Two pounds of wine under the belly, rushed to the center of the stage, shouting that in 2009, the association is the sunshine reform, where do the two words sunshine come from? Why do you pat your chest to guarantee that this is a sunshine reform? Even if you dare to forge the speech of your national leader, how much gold does your words contain?

The Ministry of Finance has spoken out against it: the loss of state-owned assets should be compensated! What about lenovo problems?

On December 8, the Ministry of Finance issued the Notice on Matters Concerning the Regulation of the Transfer of Assets of State-Owned Financial Institutions.

(1) Improper transfer of benefits shall not be carried out through the transfer of assets.

(2) State-owned financial institutions should earnestly strengthen the supervision and management of the transfer of assets in branches and sub-enterprises at all levels, put an end to black-box operations, ensure the orderly circulation of assets, and prevent the loss of state-owned assets.

(3) Unless otherwise provided by the State, state-owned financial institutions shall not transfer assets to non-state-owned transferees by way of direct agreement transfer without the public auction disposal procedure.

(4) Where the relevant personnel of financial departments at all levels and state-owned financial institutions violate laws, administrative regulations and the provisions of this Notice, make decisions beyond their authority, neglect their duties, or abuse their powers for personal gain, resulting in the loss of state-owned assets, they shall bear the liability for compensation in accordance with laws and regulations, and the relevant departments shall give sanctions in accordance with the authority of personnel and cadre management;

(5) Where a crime is constituted, it shall be transferred to the judicial organs for handling.

These words are thorough enough, specific enough, cruel enough, absolute enough, no dead ends, no hesitations, no ambiguity, no room for negotiation.

Of course, this provision is mainly aimed at the current work, but it is clearly mentioned here that the relevant personnel of financial departments at all levels and state-owned financial institutions have violated laws, administrative regulations and the provisions of this Circular... The sentences are long and take care of all aspects of the situation, but the core is to deal with those who break the law.

As we all know, in 2009, the Law of the People's Republic of China on State-owned Assets of Enterprises was promulgated, and Lenovo reformed the transfer of suspected state-owned assets, that is, after the promulgation of the law, if it is confirmed, it is a typical illegal act.

The key to the problem now is that the parties concerned should respond to the major concerns of netizens, and whether this issue cannot be circumvented or hidden. It is reasonable to think that some people can do ostrich-like, but the relevant departments of the Chinese Academy of Sciences have been silent, and this notice from the Ministry of Finance should be an urge for the verification work of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Verify that Lenovo's restructuring in 2009 is suspected of the loss of state-owned assets, and everything is ready only to owe Dongfeng.

I have confidence in that.

What about you?

(Written after dinner on December 8, 2021, at No. 8, Nanluoguxiang, Dongcheng District, Beijing)

Read on