To promote the marketization of data elements, the primary problem is to confirm data rights

Liu Dian and Bai Yu: To promote the marketization of data elements, the first problem is to confirm data rights

Building a benchmark city for the digital economy, fully releasing the value of data elements, and promoting the marketization of data elements can not only provide new momentum for the development of the global digital economy, but also help to enhance China's influence in the global digital economy competition pattern. In this process, data rights confirmation has become the primary problem that needs to be solved urgently, and the current lack of sufficient legal policies and institutional systems to clarify the allocation of data rights, including a series of issues such as data revenue distribution, personal privacy protection, corporate profit acquisition, and public data security, hinders the construction of a national and even global data hub. We should build and explore data sharing and trading systems, including enterprise data, government data, and personal data, and accelerate the construction of a production management system and mechanism with data rights confirmation as the premise, data valuation as the key, data transactions as the basis, and data privacy as the bottom line, so as to release the value of data elements and ensure digital security.

Link to the original article: Accelerate the marketization of data elements

China's pension insurance system will gradually transition from the basic pension insurance "one pillar dominant" to the multi-level pension insurance system and model of "three pillars standing". To increase the proportion of the second and third pillars of endowment insurance in the old-age care of residents, it is necessary to have a forward-looking top-level design, a scientific attitude and path, which is an important task in the reform of the old-age security system during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period.

The construction of a multi-level and multi-pillar pension insurance system is the established institutional goal of China's old-age security reform. Expanding the second pillar and developing the third pillar is an important means to consolidate the wealth of the society to cope with the aging of the population, and is the main material foundation and core asset of China's old-age security system. In order to cope with the aging of the population, in the future, China's pension insurance system will gradually transition from the basic pension insurance "one pillar dominant" to the multi-level pension insurance system and model of "three pillars", especially to vigorously develop the relatively backward second and third pillar pension insurance, which will become one of the main directions of china's pension security system reform during the "Fourteenth Five-Year Plan" period.

Original link: Building a multi-level pension insurance system and the "breakthrough" of the third pillar

In contemporary times, people's interest patterns, public interests, public spaces, social spaces, social relationship models, and the role of individuals in a "complex society" should be understood from the perspective of informatization, dataization, and intelligence. The community in the new stage of development should be a hybrid community in which "acquaintances" and "strangers" share public space and social space in the Internet environment, and share public responsibility and social responsibility. Convenient life, convenient travel, supporting services, mutual trust, safety and security will be its basic characteristics; public services, such as pension, medical care, education, leisure and employment facilities will be more complete; the integration of various services and interpersonal relations of the community governance system and the modernization of governance capabilities are also on the agenda. All localities are building "5-10 minutes life circle", "15 minute life circle", "30 minute life circle" and "1 hour life circle" means that the community will be more convenient and flat, breaking through the boundaries of the original residential areas, and forming a new type of urban public space. Informatization, digitization and intelligence will be organically combined with the innovation of administrative systems and social organizations to form a new governance system and governance model.

Original link: Ding Yuanzhu: A new way of grassroots social governance

In non-rule of law thinking, there is a "deified monistic subject". That is, to regard the subject of the rule of law as a universal, god-like representative of all people, above all people of the sole subject. He must be omniscient, all-powerful, all-powerful, all-effective. Imagine that this subject operates and operates there, the law and the reality of all the legislative judiciary, are just its tools.

In the rule of law thinking, it is the identification of "pluralistic realistic subjects with rights and responsibilities in place". That is, to recognize that the subject of reality is pluralistic, and the boundaries and connections between pluralism are tied to the social bond of rights and responsibilities. Therefore, ensuring the unity and in place of rights and responsibilities is the essence and soul of the rule of law.

Link: Several philosophical questions of our time

As we all know, the imported products of Chinese social science are very large, but the times are strongly calling for subjectivity in Chinese social sciences. We have taken the lead in proposing historical politics in political science, which is recognized by the academic circles as a new direction for the development of Chinese political science. Comparatively speaking, the historical research path does not seem to have received due attention in China's economic circles. The author believes that the study of the historical path is also the only way for the government to vigorously advocate and invest huge amounts of money in the construction of socialist political economy. Many concepts are not proposed by relying on database-based mathematical deductions, but on theoretical expositions of historical ontology. For example, it is probably impossible to simply use "rational people" to explain the Chinese of "benevolent people and love people"; nor can we use the limited government of the West to explain the unlimited responsibility of the people-oriented government; the supremacy of life pursued by the people-oriented government in the epidemic, the counterpart assistance promoted, and the immigration-style poverty alleviation are social development, which may not be measured by GDP; what is the relationship between the egalitarian social structure created by land reform for economic growth is probably the fundamental question at the ontological level that Chinese economics needs to answer.

Original link: Calling for the intellectual subjectivity of Chinese social sciences

Source: Guangming Network - Theory Channel