laitimes

The other side of the wrong (there is right and wrong to be called wrong)

author:Where did the lazy cat go
The other side of the wrong (there is right and wrong to be called wrong)

If the "right" truth is right, there is a contrarian shore, that is, wrong. If the "wrong" truth is right, there is a contrarian shore, that is, wrong. This other shore of error is wrong with great fanfare, because there is another shore. So no matter what state we have in our minds, we don't have the ability to get rid of such a flaw, and thus come up with an answer, we shouldn't have a dispute.

If there is no right or wrong, the same answer is clarified. The method of one person and another, or one person and all people, in the process of communication, is to be content and harmonious with each other. The world is only moody and sad, and the desire is only from small to large. Joy and sorrow are the position of all things in the world, and the place that originates from its color needs and all things lies in the absence of discord. The desire for joy and sorrow is from small to large, and small desire can also be seen as a big desire, which lies in contentment.

A person's heart can control the outside, we take his inner truth and falsehood as the standard, a person's external can control the heart, we take his external truth and falseness as the standard, so whether a person is in the heart or outside, there is no reason to hide the "other side of the wrong" of all truths. There is a situation called harmlessness, which is justified in the same way that it may be the same as it is.

If a person's main idea does not agree with this "wrong other shore" truth, whether the person is immortal or old, sick and dead, or whatever, other truths will be defeated by the eternal truth of the "wrong other shore". Immortals, after all, there can be no reason to say that they are good people, and after all, there can be no posterity to say that they are bad people. Or passed down from generation to generation, or exists from generation to generation, the main purpose of the "other side of the wrong" principle, only love this theme can be passed on forever.

There is no need to be too harsh on love, but it does not exist, and then as long as you understand this truth, you are equivalent to having a descendant. Can be affectionate, do not seek no reason is not a fate.

Emotion is the bridge to this truth: family affection, friendship, love, sympathy.

Words are spread three times for many, and people are sparse in their three surnames. Words are passed on three times: the first time is expression, the second time is emphasis, and the third time is unnecessary, then more. RenRong three surnames: the first surname is Xiangshou, the second surname is credible, and the third surname is untrustworthy, then it is sparse.

Love is disciplined and free, only because there is no contradiction between each other, and even more because there is no contradiction in the world. The rules of etiquette are not bondage, imagine many delicate scenes. The decision depends on the decision, the other shore is verified on the other shore, there is no unfinished etiquette and self-heart, only the rules and etiquette of not doing and the self-heart.

If they are all wrong choices, they must all be right, all are right trade-offs, and there must be light and heavy, or benevolent teachers, or golden jade peace.

All things should be loved by all, and then righteousness should be stopped. To enjoy the affection, to love the benevolence of all things, to stop doing righteousness, to take the wisdom of all things. Wisdom and benevolence exist, that is, they are saints.

We see black holes devouring everything that comes close to him, and that black holes can swallow black holes that are smaller than him. It means that the black hole and the black hole have melted, and the matter and matter have melted. If we all belong to the material, then all emotions should be lower than matter, and if we are all individuals, then there should be individual material limits, and since there are limits, there is surrender, but there are emotions but no surrender. If the destruction of matter is extreme, why is there still an extreme repulsion? I think there can only be one answer, and that is that emotions are too material.

If the microscopic world cannot have a good answer, but we all need answers, the microscopic should be endless micro, for the more microscopic in the microscopic, there will be no good answer, but there must also be an answer. If this is an answer without an answer, then there should be no resistance to the "other side of the wrong", and if this is an answer with an answer, then there should be an extension of the "wrong side". If non-self is the final answer, then there is me is another shore, one moment inference the result says there is, the other moment inference the result says no, then the initial thought, is equivalent to the expansion of nothingness.

What harms people is not necessarily harmful to animals, and what harms animals is not necessarily harmful to people, so the so-called harm is a kind of resistance, then harmful things should have a kind of avoidance. The four seasons are cyclical, crops are sometimes harvested in autumn and hidden in winter; the four seasons are like spring, the territory is limited, and the gold and jade are not scattered to avoid.

There is a kind of hurt called powerlessness, and there is a kind of forgiveness called juxtaposition. Man and man do not talk about powerlessness, because it is not only people, but people and things that talk about powerlessness, because they are powerless.

Water gathers into rivers, rivers gather into seas, wood gathers into forests, and forests gather into forests. Speak of the source, speak of the essence.

Without the past, there is no present, the mistakes of the past are equal to the mistakes of the present, there is no future without the present, and the mistakes of the present are equal to the mistakes of the future.

Not how to behave and pursue, but how to restrain and try, the truth of the world is not right and wrong, only those who think that there are right and wrong are wrong, because for contradictions are contradictory, like a blank piece of paper stained with a drop of ink, for the right and wrong contradictions between survival and death, then care about things other than life and death, there is cultural inheritance for the account of death, and there is cultural resistance to the account of survival.

Read on