laitimes

Was the historical King of Lu really a faint and unscrupulous emperor? What is the truth

author:A class of movies

The TV series "List of Fengshen Gods" must have been watched by everyone, and in the play, the king of Lu is obsessed with beauty and lives an extremely luxurious life. But in real history, was King Lu really such a brutal and treacherous emperor? We will not make any comments on this view. Let's analyze the emperor of Shang from the following historical records.

Was the historical King of Lu really a faint and unscrupulous emperor? What is the truth

The original name of King Huan was Di Xin, the last emperor of the Shang Dynasty. During his reign, there were mixed reviews and criticisms, and his historical merits were even more enigmatic. First of all, let's interpret the title of King of Sui. The title of King of Lu is a slanderous comment on him by later generations, and the word 巧 in the King of Lu means to damage righteousness and damage goodness. In many historical documents, we have seen many people comment that the king of Qiu was faint, addicted to wine, and lived a life of extreme luxury every day. What's more, he is said to be adulterous, tyrannical, and even disrespectful to his ancestors. It is precisely for this reason that more and more people have misunderstood the King of Qiu. So that in the final Battle of Makino, he lost the hearts and minds of the people and the army, causing the soldiers to rebel on the battlefield and fail. Ended his life with a fire. Although historical accounts vary, most of the reasons are the same. Although the saying that the King of Lu is faint and ignorant continues to this day, in the long river of history, there will still be people who will put forward different views on this. Among them was Confucius's disciple Zigong, who believed that this was a malicious slander against the King of Sui by a man with a heart. Looking at the kings of history, it is not difficult to find that there has always been a case of malicious slander and planting of stolen goods.

Was the historical King of Lu really a faint and unscrupulous emperor? What is the truth

The King of Lu was only one of the victims, but the denigration of him was quite bad compared to the other kings. Modern historians have found through research that the evil deeds of king Huan have intensified over time. It can be seen from this that the claim that the king of Lu is faint and drunk cannot be fully believed. At this point, let's talk about the famous historian Sima Qian's judgment on the King of Sui. Sima Qian had this record in the history books of the King of Huan, "Emperor Huanzi discerns the diseases of the emperor and hears very sensitively; he is superior in his ability and has a fierce hand; he knows enough to be far away from him, and his words are enough to decorate right; he is able to be a subordinate to the people, and he is high in the world, thinking that everyone is under himself." ”

Through this evaluation, it shows that the king of Qiu should be a king of both culture and martial arts, who is quick-witted, courageous, and has the ability to discern people, rather than the faint-heartedness recorded in history. Here, we have to say about the woman Dai Ji, many rumors and biographies, all say that Da Ji is the root of the King of Gong's fainting and indulgence in wine. However, according to relevant historical records, Daji was only a woman of the Su clan. Chinese there is such a record in the Jin language, the King of Su sent troops to attack the Su clan, and the Su clan could not resist the attack of the King of Su, and between the extermination of the clan and the surrender, the chief of the Su clan chose to surrender. He gave in many cattle, sheep, horses, and beauties. In addition, there are also too many such records in the bamboo secretary year and the deeds of the emperor. It can be seen from this that Daji is just a plaything dedicated to the Su clan for peace. If you don't turn her into the main reason for the collapse of the Shang Dynasty, it is really a bit of an exaggerated exaggeration of this woman. As for the merits and faults of the King of Lu, everyone said that Yunyun, whether the King of Lu was a Ming Jun or a Dark King, it was left to future generations to further investigate. As for what you think of the King of Lu, you are welcome to leave your views in the comments section. We'll see you later.

Was the historical King of Lu really a faint and unscrupulous emperor? What is the truth

Read on