Recently, the confrontation between NATO and Russia is intensifying, and belarus, which is Russia's "good friend", is gradually increasing pressure. Recently, in the face of Western sanctions and slander, Belarus has finally begun to fight back and puncture the false veil of Western countries. On November 26, there are three major international events worth paying attention to.
First, the refugee crisis on the Polish-Belarusian border still shows no signs of abating, with Belarusian Prime Minister Golovchenko saying Belarus had fallen victim to a hybrid war waged by the West.
Now that tens of thousands of refugees are approaching the border between Poland and Belarus, a new wave of refugee crisis is on the string, and the EU and NATO are beginning to shift the blame to Belarus and even Russia.
The so-called hybrid war refers to the comprehensive use of advantages in the fields of politics, economy, military technology, media and intelligence, and exerting all-round pressure on opponents in order to achieve the political goal of winning without a war. For example, in this refugee crisis, the EU and NATO have used public opinion attacks and sanctions to attack Belarus.
Golovchenko pointed out that the four sanctions launched by Western countries were launched under the pretext of refugees, but the refugee problem was caused by the European Union. It is The policies of the West that have destroyed the homes of these refugees, and it is infuriating that when the homes of the refugees are destroyed, the Western countries even prevent these refugees from reaching Europe.
Even if the West, which controls the mainstream media, is clever, it cannot be hidden that the West is the main culprit that has led to the disasters in the Middle East and wave after wave of refugee crises.
For days, the debate over who is to blame for the refugee crisis in Belarus or the European Union has become a war of words. From the source point of view, the refugees on the Polish-Belarusian border are mainly from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and other places. It is clear that it is NATO's years of constant wars and conflicts that have turned the local population into refugees. Today, the West bites back, and the humanitarian and human rights spirit it flaunts is wiped out by the ugliness of the EU and NATO's refusal to take responsibility.
The second thing is that the Solomon Islands of the South Pacific Islands are in turmoil, Australia has intervened in the military and has entered a sovereign country in a dignified manner, and China is paying close attention to the development of the situation.
Recently, the violence in Honiara, the capital of the Solomon Islands, has continued to escalate, and many shops and bank warehouses have been looted and burned. After the riots, Solomon police declared martial law in the capital to the 26th and took measures to stop the spread of violence.
But martial law didn't work, and protesters took to the streets again, attacking the local Chinatown. The protesters for the riot came from the country's Province of Maleta, which has long been at odds with Solomon Islands Prime Minister Sogavare and has repeatedly demanded his resignation. A few days earlier, hundreds of protesters from the province had stormed the capital and stormed the Parliament building, before the protesters turned to Chinese shops.
The Chinese Embassy specially issued a safety reminder that the local Chinese suspend all business activities and take all necessary security measures to stay away from the main roads of demonstrations. In fact, in the past, the Solomon Islands were involved with the Taiwan authorities, but after the establishment of diplomatic relations in 2019, the Solomon Islands have entered China's "circle of friends". So while there is no shortage of radicals in this riot, it is more likely that forces with ulterior motives are secretly causing harm.
Sure enough, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced that at the request of the Solomon government, Australia would send more than 100 police and defense personnel to the Solomon Islands to quell the unrest, arguing that the move did not represent any position.
In fact, it is surprising that Australia has sent troops into a sovereign country in such a dignified manner, so the Australian media has particularly justified the prime minister's behavior, claiming that if Australia does not send someone to quell the riots, the Solomon Islands may turn to China for help.
This is definitely good news for Australia, which has always intended to eliminate "Chinese influence" in the South Pacific island countries, and taking the opportunity to send troops to expand its influence is a double eagle for Morrison. In addition to Australia, the province that launched the protest has a deep connection with the United States, and the protest is full of American shadows. A province has already held a protest, and I am afraid that in the future, under the manipulation of the United States, this small South Pacific island nation will not escape the fate of division.
Third, Indian experts spoke out at the climate conference to support China and criticize the United States. China and India have rarely reached an agreement to jointly "fire" at the United States.
"The United States accounts for only 4% and 5% of the world's population, but uses 25% of the world's resources, and americans transfer manufacturing to China, but they bite back and say that China has caused carbon pollution, and if a large number of industrial products are manufactured in the United States, they do not know what kind of pollution the world will be."
At the 26th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the speech of Indian scholar Vijay Prashad sparked a heated discussion.
Prashad answered a long-standing question? Is it reasonable for the developed countries in the West to enjoy the dividends of processing and manufacturing by developing countries, but accuse them of polluting the environment?
Of course not! Putting aside their differences and controversies for the time being, the neighbors of China and India have a lot in common because of their status as developing countries. Prashad said the so-called climate change is nothing more than the slogan of the Western middle class, and instead of worrying about the future of the earth's environment, it is better to care about the 2.7 billion people in the world who are still poor and hungry.
Moreover, the shackles imposed on developing countries by Western countries have not been removed to this day. For example, India, once colonized by britain. Between 1765 and 1938, britain stole $45 trillion from India.
Why has the attitude of Westerners not changed since 400 years ago to the present? Because colonialism was never far away. It is an obvious fact that the West is the "culprit" of climate change.
For example, China is producing buckets, bolts or mobile phones that the West needs, but it is simply unjustifiable to be blamed. In fact, China has also offered its own views on climate change.
At a foreign ministry press conference earlier this month, spokesman Wang Wenbin pointed out that to deal with climate change, it is the west's practical actions that need to be taken, not empty language. It points directly to the dual-standard attitude of Western countries towards themselves and developing countries.
In order to reduce emissions, China has added an average of about 12,000 hectares of new afforestation per day, and about 90,000 kilowatts of new photovoltaic installations. Western countries, on the other hand, view the climate plans of developing countries by unfair standards.
Although Indian experts support China in order to cheer for Modi to ask for climate aid funds from developed countries, and they cannot prove big propositions such as Sino-Indian relations, they at least illustrate one truth, that is, the Manipulation of the West is unpopular. If the West is not aware of this, its climate plans will lose support in the developing international camp and become a game for the self-amusement of the fallen aristocracy.