The sinister remarks made me feel that there was no culture and culture, and after reading a little book, I took it out to show it, and his focus was on the director Qian's use of the film as a prop to vent his emotions. I think that the pattern of the film must be related to the director's personal experience, the films made by directors with different experiences are not the same, the director makes this film to express criticism, expressing this emotion does not mean that he is addicted to this emotion, revealing this status quo does not represent his world view, if the director's works represent his values, a hat is buckled, this is a very terrible thing, so, who will dare to make works that criticize reality in the future? They will all be hated as ~~~.
Dangerous laughter is commented with angry emotions, anger is the killer of thinking, I think he fell into an irrational state. I don't know if this film poked at a certain point in his eyes, making him recall something, falling into an angry emotion and unable to extricate himself, turning to crazy criticism. There is nothing wrong with his emotions, because, as Teacher Fang Li said, "I see a person struggling in a difficult situation", and the dangerous smile is also in his own predicament, so he cannot erase anger and look at this film notarizedly, while Teacher Fang Li is beyond the emotions of the two, and looks at this film from the perspective of an elderly person's compassion, and evaluates its good and bad more objectively. Therefore, the reason why Teacher Fang Li sits in the position of producer is that the pattern is larger and the thinking is broader. It is amazing that the nearly forty years of danger are still in such a pattern.
