laitimes

Hong's words are not worth refuting

author:Pan's Zhengkun

Recently, there has been a lot of discussion on the Internet about Chen Man's gloomy photography, and from my personal point of view, I am on the side of the harsh criticism of Chen Man. The reason for this involves both patriotism and hatred of this ugly work.

Of course, there are also people who express their appreciation and recognition of Chen Man's photography (here only referring to the strange and ugly works he has made for Chinese models), such as Hong Huang.

Hong Huang, a female writer, did not know how aesthetic she was before, but now I seem to know something about her, at least, she agrees with the perverted aesthetics that use ugliness as beauty to scare people. Based on this aesthetic form of hers, I say that Hong Huang's views on Chen Man's agreement are not worth refuting.

Of course, I have a few questions to ask: First, is Chinese characterized by this infinitely magnified ugliness? Second, does Chen Man have to show ugliness in order to make his debut in the world? Why don't she show it naked to others, it's easier to debut! Is it really not a disgraceful ugliness of the country to actively cooperate with foreigners in the ugliness of China? Also said to enlarge the characteristics of Asians, hehe, Hong Huang, you see what she photographed for Koreans?

Hong's words are not worth refuting
Hong's words are not worth refuting
Hong's words are not worth refuting

Read on