laitimes

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

author:The rush of history

Yi Zhongtian's hometown is in Hunan, and he graduated from Wuhan University in 1981 and stayed on to teach. He is a well-known scholar and writer in China, and he also has a large number of fans who recognize and oppose the content of his lectures in China.

When I was at Wuhan University, because of his unique teaching style, he was very popular and sought after by students, so when it came time for him to lecture, it was called more than one person.

However, there are more people who are popular, because his fiery heat has depressed the atmosphere of other teachers' classes and caused strong dissatisfaction among other teachers. Therefore, Yi Zhongtian has not been able to evaluate the title of Wuhan University, one reason is that he is not a bachelor's degree, which is really difficult for him, because the highest in that era is a university degree.

Another reason is that his lectures have "abducted" all the students and been excluded.

So he quit his job and left Wuhan University. Went to Xiamen University, it was also a cheer. The title was also evaluated, the salary was also increased by 5 times, and it was also on the hundred forums of CCTV.

Now it's even more famous. Yi Zhongtian, who quickly became popular, is just like his name, thriving at the same time, it is like a day in the sky.

So the provocative people, the criticism, the insults and all kinds of voices came out. After all, the master is in the folk, there are mountains outside the mountains, and there are people outside the people, so Yi Zhongtian does not know whether it is to avoid suspicion or for what, in short, it has not been very active recently.

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

Once, when he interviewed reporters about the peasant uprising, he said that he would not write half a word about the peasant uprising. Yi Zhongtian once said: "I can't write half a word about the peasant uprising, whether it is the Yellow Nest Uprising or the Yellow Turban Uprising, I will not write about it." Because Yi Zhongtian's view is that the peasant uprising cannot represent the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, nor can it make any valuable positive significance in promoting social development and progress. Therefore, his attitude towards the peasant uprising was silent.

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

When it comes to peasant uprisings, one of the first questions we have to ask is why there are peasant uprisings? What is the significance of the peasant uprising? Is he really as insignificant as Yi Zhongtian said?

The chaotic world produces heroes, and the times create heroes. There must be some truth in the peasant revolt, who does not want to live and work in peace and contentment at sunrise and rest at sunset?

Who would have been willing to abandon the unveiling of the family's business and go out on a campaign to seek revenge? Dynasties from ancient times to the present, whether historians or other scholars, have classified the peasant revolt as the main force of a dynasty. The peasants in China are the most numerous, and the quality of the peasants' living conditions closely determines the rise and fall of a dynasty.

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

Tang Taizong said, "The people can carry the boat, and they can also overturn the boat." Chairman Mao also said, "The masses are the real heroes, and we ourselves cannot attain the minimum knowledge without understanding this ourselves." Only the people are the driving force behind the creation of world history. "Chairman Mao also said, who gave us our power? It was given by the working class, by the poor and lower-middle peasants, and by the broad masses of the people by 90 percent.

It is true that the peasant uprising has slowed down progress and has no propulsive effect as Yi Zhongtian said, but it cannot be biased in general. For the existence of reality has its rationality.

So why is Yi Zhongtian so extreme?

I think this has something to do with personal opinions and the personality created by the environment, just like Yi Zhongtian once said that he was resolutely opposed to Jackie Chan. What he encourages and advocates is to look forward to inheriting people, which I do feel empathy for, and should be recognized by most people.

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

Because of the current situation of fewer eugenics, so the children of each family are treasures in the palm of their hands, and parents must talk about conditions at all times in order to keep their children from losing at the starting line.

This kind of bundled education penetrates from school to family into the corners and corners of children, bit by bit. Therefore, I think Yi Zhongtian is right in this regard, saying the voice of the dragon and the phoenix.

It can be seen from this incident that because Yi Zhongtian was born in 1947, the hardships and hardships of his time could not be experienced by telling us one or two stories.

Therefore, he may be able to put forward such seemingly unreasonable views on behalf of some people, but in fact, there are reasonable existences.

Because it is true that the real people have little time to read books or how high their ideological consciousness can be except for farming and working in the fields, the organizers of the real uprising have two brushes and have a reputation in the ranks.

A successful uprising toppled a dynasty, and if the uprising failed, he continued to go home to farm, or be arrested and imprisoned, or recruited. How many uprisings can actually establish a generation of dynasties after the uprising? There are also a few.

Why did Yi Zhongtian, who dared to speak so boldly, never mention the peasant uprising, abandon his pen and not write?

Therefore, we must squarely face the historical significance of the peasant uprising and cannot directly erase its necessity and rationality. Where there is oppression, there will be resistance, and denial is useless. The people's words are particularly reasonable, and it is better for officials to go home and sell sweet potatoes if they are not the masters of the people. So if it is too corrupt and too persecuted, only the uprising is the only way for the peasants to express their anger.

Read on