laitimes

The Fool of the Dangerous Building: Systematic Death in the Face of Self-Contradiction

The Fool of the Dangerous Building: Systematic Death in the Face of Self-Contradiction

The movie was seen before, and I thought it was very good at the time.

Recently, seeing the news of the collapse of the building in the United States, the 12-story building collapsed in half and more than a hundred people were buried. Many details of the collapsed building are very similar to the story in the movie, which is a kind of prophecy, the movie is played in Russia, and the collapse accident occurred in the United States.

-

Building alerts

In the movie, an electrician noticed that the building was collapsing and immediately reported it one by one. The local mayor opened an account after they knew that they had received the situation, and did not notify the residents at the first time, and finally the electrician himself informed the residents, but some residents did not believe it.

Although the leaders knew that the building would fall, they did not go to the rescue at the first time, but had been holding a meeting to study, and after internal discussion, they found that no matter what, they were contradictory and could not be rescued.

So the rescue plan was discussed, and it became a back pot discussion, looking for a scapegoat in advance.

contradictory

At first, the leaders discovered that the quality problems about the building were caused by cutting corners, and the contractor was the leader of his own company.

The first contradiction is here, no one will take the initiative to expose their own problems, which is almost impossible.

However, the government buildings and funds themselves are small, and the resettlement of rescued people will be a long-term problem, and the rescue is only the beginning of the problem.

The second contradiction is that the resettlement problem can only be paid by the government, but the leaders can not get any benefits, and not saving is a one-time accident, and the long pain is not as good as the short pain. Human life is not necessarily a matter of heaven.

In the end, it was decided not to carry out rescue, but to arrest the electrician who found the dangerous situation. Because without burying the truth completely, each of them cannot get out.

Third, the truth will not bring salvation to the parties involved, it may bring disaster, so next time, will anyone dare to insist on telling the truth? Without the truth about electricians, wouldn't the building have collapsed?

There will only be more and more inexplicable collapses.

Systemic death

The test building crisis is originally tested and evaluated by professional personnel, but if the professional personnel do not dare to be responsible, or even if they find problems, no one dares to tell the truth, just prevarication and prevarication. Just like the emperor's new clothes, no one dares to break the truth and set himself on fire.

The people who live in these buildings, then, do not die from collapsed buildings, they die from this system, from this failed system, or in other words, the system has already betrayed them and even needs to sacrifice them in order to maintain the system.

Building

A building, when it comes to playing a positive role, helps a lot, just like a building that can house hundreds or thousands of people and can serve hundreds of thousands of people.

But if there is a problem, it is also a large-scale problem, and the impact is also huge, with hundreds of deaths and injuries and huge losses.

Without these high-rise buildings or systems, there would be no collapse of buildings, no such tragic accidents. So is the necessity of building a building questionable and debatable?

Of course, it is not to choke on food, but to ask, is a building of tens of floors really more suitable than a small building?

The huge foundation of the building itself is an overly complex project, the height and weight of the building itself will bring about the bearing problem of reinforced concrete, and the maintenance of the building is an indispensable cost, and the service life of the building may not be longer than that of the small building.

Considering all the economic and social benefits, a building is not necessarily better than a small building.

Then if you restrict the building, or reject the building, it will be a better thing, and you can't let the developer build it arbitrarily, because the beneficiary of the sale of the building is the real estate developer himself, but the victim of the accident is the public, and the real estate developer has the impulse to be irresponsible.

Buildings have serious externalities, are not an economic problem for a building, and in particular need to be restricted and regulated.

system

Another problem, when the system itself is too powerful, may limit the spread of truth.

For example, in the story in the movie, the building has a problem, but the person who builds the building is responsible for the rescue, and the contradictions and conflicts within the system are difficult to justify themselves no matter how to solve them. At this point, the system is the real cause of the building's collapse.

The system that monitors the building, and the monitoring system itself, needs to be effective at the same time so that the building does not collapse. A problem with one of the links may indicate a problem with the entire monitoring chain or the system, but the system has the instinct to cover up the problem.

If the system does not have the ability to self-monitor and reflect, the solution of the building problem seems to be in a self-contradiction.

At this point, rejecting the building and the system may be the only effective way.

In addition, residents are always the first victim of the building, so every resident should monitor the building, rather than relying on the system itself to warn and solve the problem, residents need to participate in the system decision-making, pay attention to the emergence of building problems, monitor every step of the system to solve.

Residents stand by or watch from the sidelines, and there are consequences for watching the fire from the other side, and it is too late to start the fire.

Read on