You can look directly below,
the legacy of industrialism
in engels' first book, the condition of the working class in england in 1844, he described the appalling way of life of the workers, or proletariat, in manchester, london, dublin, and edinburgh, and found similar situations in all these cities. he reported filthy streets with pools of stagnant urine and excrement, filled with the stench of animal putrefaction from the tanneries. widespread cholera outbreaks occurred, along with constant epidemics of consumption and typhus. workers were packed into one-room huts or the cellars of damp houses that had been built along old ditches to save the house-owner money. they lived in conditions that defied consideration of cleanliness and health, engels said-and this manchester, "the second city of england, the first manufacturing city of the world."
Engels's father was a beneficiary of the Industrial Revolution and owned a large textile factory, so Engels was in a wealthy family, and his strong economic foundation also gave him a deep educational background, and he could also travel around and meet Marx, who was Marx's patron under the resonance and jointly completed a great book called "I dare not say". The experience of travel became a book, and the description of the environment at that time was particularly vivid, which made me feel compelled to open a record.
The streets are filled with stagnant stagnant stagnant water (living water is fluid), and the putrid smell of animals comes from tanneries. Cholera (non-stop strain) and blight (with lice spots on the body) are widespread. The laborers were packed into small, makeshift brick and wood houses in individual rooms. To save money, the cottage was built next to an old channel. The whole housing environment is working against cleanliness and hygiene. It was the center of the world's factories.
the proletariat were worked to the point of exhaustion, wearing cheap clothing that gave no protection against accidents the climate. they could buy only the food spurned by the bourgeoisie, such as decaying meat, wilted vegetables, "sugar" that was the refuse of soap-boiling firms, and cocoa mixed with earth.
Workers worked until they were physically prostrate, wearing cheap clothes that were unsafe against accidents and bad weather. They could only buy food discarded by their bosses, expired rotten meat, withered vegetables, sugar from soap factories, and cocoa beans mixed with dirt.
when work disappeared and wages failed, even this meager diet proved impossible, and many workers and their families began to starve; this caused illness and a continued inability to work, should work become available. doctors were unaffordable, and very often entire families starved to death. the worker, engels explained, could only obtain what he needed- healthy living conditions, secure employment, and a decent wage- from the bourgeoisie, "which can decree his life or death." he was insistent that this hugely exploitative, capital-owning class should therefore take immediate steps to change workers' conditions and stop its careless murder of entire social class.
When jobs disappear and wages fall, even microblogging food is impossible to get. Many workers began to starve. This caused illness, and even if there was a job opportunity, the ability to work was lost, the doctor could not afford it, and often the whole family went to Huangquan together. Engels believed that if, if, if, would, would, would. It's different. Anyway, under the blood, Engels came out with this "I dare not say" book. Engos was reluctant to join the family business.
Poor public health, precarious salaries, physical and mental exhaustion. —> died early in the world. — >that's "just that."
Against that line, all the original accumulation of capital is. Maybe even if my knowledge is still short, this sentence has not yet been overturned. Embarrassed, I studied sociology, and it seems a little bit like history here, but whatever it is, it feels like it is absorbed.
#Sociology##History# #英文 #