分享興趣，傳播快樂，
增長見聞，留下美好！
親愛的您，這裡是LearningYard學苑。
阿萌為大家帶來的主題是
《精讀論文學習寫作》特别篇，
歡迎您用心通路，
本期推文閱讀時長約5分鐘，
請您耐心閱讀。
Share interest, spread happiness,
Increase knowledge and leave good news!
Dear you, this is LearningYard Academy.
The theme that Amen brings to you is
"Intensive Reading Paper Learning and Writing" special chapter,
Welcome to visit with your heart,
This tweet is about 5 minutes long to read.
Please read with patience.
親愛的讀者們大家好，本次小編帶大家來賞析《基于 DEMATEL 和信任網絡的畢達哥拉斯模糊多屬性應急決策方法》新篇章，幫助增進大家在供應鍊方面的學習。
Hello, dear readers. This is a new chapter of the Pythagorean Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Emergency Decision-making Method Based on DEMATEL and Trust Networks to help you learn more about supply chains.
我們從摘要中就可以分析得到：本文主要解決的是應急事件，相對于其他大部分期刊本文所撰寫的摘要精簡的介紹了所研究的創新點以及實用性。
We can get the analysis from the abstract: the main solution of this paper is emergency, compared with most other journals in this paper written abstract concise introduction of the innovation and practicability of the research.
引言部分整體分析雖然平淡，但是小編認為作者在其中的表達思路很清晰，作者以研究大背景為切入口，後面以DEMATEL作為研究基礎進行拓展，小編在這部分閱讀中能總結道，突發應急事件是近期的研究熱點，以往的其應對方法一般以DEMATEL展開。
The introduction part of the overall analysis though insipid, but small make up ideas that the expression of the author in the very clear, the author is related with the background research, based on the research of the DEMATEL behind expand, small make up in this part of reading can be concluded that emergency emergency is a hot spot in recent study, past the general to DEMATEL approach.
這部分小編認為的文中亮點是在這裡面作者由前期作者研究的遺漏增進出下一步所分析的社會網絡。
The highlight of this article is that the author enhanced the social network analyzed in the next step from the omission of the previous author's research.
這部分小編認為的文中亮點是作者總結了當下畢達哥拉斯模糊集的研究類型，也相當于總結了作者接下來的出發點有哪些，可以說從上部分分析我們可以看得出作者将自己的個人思路梳理後進行的表述展現了出來。
This part of the Xiaobian believes that the highlight of the article is that the author summarizes the current research types of Pythagorean fuzzy sets, which is equivalent to the summary of the author's next starting point. It can be said that from the analysis of the above part, we can see that the author has shown the expression of his own personal thoughts.
以上是作者對所研究的内容基礎模型建構，後續作者增加了決策者權重的考慮，作者認為在突發公共衛生事件應急管理的信任網絡中有兩個主要問題不能忽視:a)決策者信任關系的不完全性不能忽視。b)決策者評估資訊的相似度。是以開始建構初始信任網絡：
The above is the construction of the content-based model of the study by the author. Later, the author added the consideration of the weight of decision makers. The author believes that there are two main problems that cannot be ignored in the trust network of public health emergency management :a) the incompleteness of the trust relationship of decision makers cannot be ignored.b) Decision makers assess the similarity of information.So we start to build the initial trust network:
對于突發公共衛生事件的應急評估，作者為了解決應急決策資訊的不準确性和多樣性，在畢達哥拉斯模糊環境中建構信任網絡，通過各應急影響因素評估值的相似度更新初始的信任關系，鑒于簡單的歐式距離無法很好地描述畢達哥拉斯模糊集之間的距離測度，參照文獻提出的基于三角形幾何中心改進的距離測度，用幾何中心均衡各個評估模糊值的資訊含量，論文建構的畢達哥拉斯模糊數的相似度測度如式(13)所示：
For public health emergencies contingency assessment, the author in order to solve the emergency decision-making information accuracy and diversity, not build trust in the Pythagorean fuzzy environment network, through the emergency influence factors evaluation of value similarity to update the initial trust relationship, given the simple Euclidean distance cannot describe the Pythagorean well distance measure between fuzzy sets,Referring to the improved distance measure based on triangle geometric center proposed in literature, the geometric center is used to balance the information content of each evaluation fuzzy value. The Pythagorean fuzzy number similarity measure constructed in this paper is shown in Equation (13) :
作者總結到在實際應急決策行為中，決策者往往會根據自己的主觀認知對其餘決策者生成初始信任關系，由于應急領域涉及廣泛的專業問題，需根據偏好相似度對信任關系進行修正，得到混合信任度。由于最終的混合信任度可以反映決策者的先驗認知、知識水準、相關領域的權威以及客觀的偏好評估資訊。是以，以初始信任度的信任期望值和偏好相似度确定決策者的權重值更符合應急決策的真實性，每位決策者的混合信任度總值為TD ，為了明顯展現決策者在混合信任網絡中的整體權威程度，對資料進行歸一化處理：
The author concludes that in practical emergency decision-making, decision makers often generate initial trust relationships with other decision makers according to their subjective cognition. Since the emergency field involves a wide range of professional problems, the trust relationships need to be modified according to preference similarity to get mixed trust.Because the final mixed trust degree can reflect the decision maker's prior cognition, knowledge level, authority in related fields and objective preference assessment information.Therefore, it is more consistent with the authenticity of emergency decisions to determine the weight value of decision makers based on the trust expectation and preference similarity of the initial trust degree. The total value of mixed trust degree of each decision maker is TD. In order to clearly reflect the overall authority degree of decision makers in the mixed trust network, the data are normalized:
-
今天的分享就到這裡了。
如果您對今天的文章有獨特的想法，歡迎給我們留言，讓我們相約明天，祝您今天過得開心快樂！Shared here today.
If you have a special association with today's article,
Welcome to leave us a message, let us meet tomorrow,
Have a great day today!
參考資料：百度、谷歌翻譯。參考文獻：[1]趙敬華,榮海迎,呂錫婷,林傑.基于DEMATEL和信任網絡的畢達哥拉斯模糊多屬性應急決策方法[J/OL].計算機應用研究:1-8[2022-10-16].DOI:10.19734/j.issn.1001-3695.2022.05.0286.