目錄
- QuantLib 金融計算——C++ 代碼改寫成 Python 程式的一些經驗
- 概述
- 将 C++ 代碼改寫成 Python 程式
- 對比結果
- 總結
- 擴充閱讀
Python 在科學計算、資料分析和可視化等方面已經形成了非常強大的生态。而且,作為一門時尚的腳本語言,易學易用。是以,對于量化分析和風險管理的從業者來說,将某些 QuantLib 的曆史代碼轉換成 Python 程式是一件值得嘗試的工作。
Python 本身的面向對象機制非常完善,借助 SWIG 的包裝,由 C++ 代碼轉換而成的 Python 程式基本上可以完整地保留原本的類架構。對于使用者來說,應用層面的曆史代碼幾乎可以平行的進行移植,隻需稍加修改即可。
本文将以 QuantLib 官方網站上的 EquityOption.cpp 為例,展示如何将應用層面的 C++ 代碼轉換成 Python 程式,并總結出一般的轉換方法和注意事項。
下面,我将逐句把 C++ 代碼改寫成 Python 程式。
C++ 代碼:
#include <ql/qldefines.hpp>
#ifdef BOOST_MSVC
# include <ql/auto_link.hpp>
#endif
#include <ql/instruments/vanillaoption.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/binomialengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/analyticeuropeanengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/analytichestonengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/baroneadesiwhaleyengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/bjerksundstenslandengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/batesengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/integralengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/fdblackscholesvanillaengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/mceuropeanengine.hpp>
#include <ql/pricingengines/vanilla/mcamericanengine.hpp>
#include <ql/time/calendars/target.hpp>
#include <ql/utilities/dataformatters.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
using namespace QuantLib;
#if defined(QL_ENABLE_SESSIONS)
namespace QuantLib {
Integer sessionId() { return 0; }
}
#endif
Python 代碼:
import QuantLib as ql
import prettytable as pt
首先,引入必要的子產品,對 C++ 來說是一組頭檔案。Python 的優勢顯而易見。
// set up dates
Calendar calendar = TARGET();
Date todaysDate(15, May, 1998);
Date settlementDate(17, May, 1998);
Settings::instance().evaluationDate() = todaysDate;
# set up dates
calendar = ql.TARGET()
todaysDate = ql.Date(15, ql.May, 1998)
settlementDate = ql.Date(17, ql.May, 1998)
ql.Settings.instance().evaluationDate = todaysDate
C++ 中對象的聲明有兩種常見的方式:
-
,其中BaseClass object = Class(...)
可以是Class
本身,或者其派生類。示例中的BaseClass
正是TARGET
的派生類;Calendar
-
。Class object(...)
Python 中無需聲明對象類型,而是以指派的形式建立一個對象,是以對于上述兩類格式的代碼,統一改寫成
object = Class(...)
經驗 1:對象聲明語句和
BaseClass object = Class(...)
統一改寫成
Class object(...)
object = Class(...)
Settings
是 QuantLib 中的一個“單體模式”的實作,通常用來為整個程式設定統一的估值日期,幾乎每個應用程式中都會出現。通過調用
Settings
的靜态方法
instance()
,使用者可以修改單體執行個體的某些屬性,其中
evaluationDate()
方法可以把存儲估值日期的成員變量位址暴露出來,讓使用者進行設定。
不過,Python 中的類沒有
::
運算符,類的方法也不能暴露成員變量的位址。是以,原本的靜态方法一律通過
.
運算符調用,同時
evaluationDate()
方法被重定義為類的
property
,這就是為什麼 Python 語句中
evaluationDate
後面沒有
()
。注意,
instance()
後面的
()
不能丢。
經驗 2:用來對進行配置的成員函數,例如
Settings::instance()
,在 Python 中以類的
evaluationDate()
形式出現,不過名稱不變。
property
// our options
Option::Type type(Option::Put);
Real underlying = 36;
Real strike = 40;
Spread dividendYield = 0.00;
Rate riskFreeRate = 0.06;
Volatility volatility = 0.20;
Date maturity(17, May, 1999);
DayCounter dayCounter = Actual365Fixed();
# our options
optType = ql.Option.Put
underlying = 36.0
strike = 40.0
dividendYield = 0.00
riskFreeRate = 0.06
volatility = 0.20
maturity = ql.Date(17, ql.May, 1999)
dayCounter = ql.Actual365Fixed()
C++ 中類内部枚舉類型的對象聲明和類對象聲明相似,采用
Class::Enum object(Class::element)
的形式。枚舉元素本質上是一些整數常量。
SWIG 在包裝 QuantLib 的 Python 接口時會把 C++ 類内部的枚舉類型轉換成 Python 類中的公有屬性,其值依然是一些整數值。是以,枚舉類型對象的聲明就直接改寫成指派語句。是以,
Class::Enum object(Class::element)
語句統一改寫成
object = Class.element
示例中的
Type
是
Option
類内部的一個枚舉型,而
Put
Type
中的一個元素,另一個是
Call
。因為
type
是 Python 的關鍵字,改寫時一定要重命名。
經驗 3:對于類中的枚舉類型,
Class::Enum object(Class::element)
object = Class.element
對于基本類型(整數、浮點數、字元、字元串)來說,改寫非常容易。由于 Python 無需聲明類型,
Type object = value
語句統一改寫成指派語句——
object = value
經驗 4:對于基本類型,
Type object = value
object = value
std::cout << "Option type = " << type << std::endl;
std::cout << "Maturity = " << maturity << std::endl;
std::cout << "Underlying price = " << underlying << std::endl;
std::cout << "Strike = " << strike << std::endl;
std::cout << "Risk-free interest rate = " << io::rate(riskFreeRate) << std::endl;
std::cout << "Dividend yield = " << io::rate(dividendYield) << std::endl;
std::cout << "Volatility = " << io::volatility(volatility) << std::endl;
std::cout << std::endl;
std::string method;
std::cout << std::endl ;
// write column headings
Size widths[] = { 35, 14, 14, 14 };
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << "Method"
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << "European"
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "Bermudan"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "American"
<< std::endl;
print('Option type =', optType)
print('Maturity =', maturity)
print('Underlying price =', underlying)
print('Strike =', strike)
print('Risk-free interest rate =', '{0:%}'.format(riskFreeRate))
print('Dividend yield =', '{0:%}'.format(dividendYield))
print('Volatility =', '{0:%}'.format(volatility))
print()
# show table
tab = pt.PrettyTable(['Method', 'European', 'Bermudan', 'American'])
字元串輸出部分沒什麼好說的,我使用了
prettytable
包來美化輸出結果。
std::vector<Date> exerciseDates;
for (Integer i = 1; i <= 4; i++)
exerciseDates.push_back(settlementDate + 3 * i * Months);
exerciseDates = ql.DateVector()
for i in range(1, 5):
exerciseDates.push_back(settlementDate + ql.Period(3 * i, ql.Months))
Python 本身沒有“模闆”的概念,是以 SWIG 隻能對模闆的執行個體化進行包裝(模闆的執行個體化就是一個具體的類),進而得到一些 Python 類。對于某些常用類型,例如
Date
,QuantLib 的 Python 接口包裝了對應的
std::vector
模闆的執行個體化,包裝後得到的 Python 類有一緻的命名格式——
ClassVector
,對于
std::vector<Date>
而言就是
DateVector
因為模闆的執行個體化實際上就是一個具體的類,是以,這部分代碼的改寫方法遵循經驗 1。
和 C++ 完全不同,Python 不是一個“強類型”的語言,在改寫涉及隐式轉換的代碼時要格外注意。
Months
是 QuantLib 中的枚舉類型
TimeUnit
的元素,SWIG 在包裝枚舉類型時會将元素轉換成 Python 中的整數,丢失了
TimeUnit
的類型資訊。由于 Python 不是強類型的,被包裝的枚舉類型會丢失類型資訊,是以,
3 * i * Months
在 C++ 中可以順利地隐式轉換成一個
Period
對象——
Period(3 * i, Months)
,但是,在 Python 中
3 * i * Months
隻會被當做三個整數相乘。此時,
3 * i * Months
必須改寫成顯式聲明的格式——
ql.Period(3 * i, ql.Months)
經驗 5:隐式轉換成對象的代碼在改寫時要改成顯式聲明的格式,這類代碼通常與枚舉類型
Period
有關。
TimeUnit
ext::shared_ptr<Exercise> europeanExercise(
new EuropeanExercise(maturity));
ext::shared_ptr<Exercise> bermudanExercise(
new BermudanExercise(exerciseDates));
ext::shared_ptr<Exercise> americanExercise(
new AmericanExercise(settlementDate, maturity));
europeanExercise = ql.EuropeanExercise(maturity)
bermudanExercise = ql.BermudanExercise(exerciseDates)
americanExercise = ql.AmericanExercise(settlementDate, maturity)
C++ 中聲明智能指針的最常見方式是:
shared_ptr<BaseClass> object(new Class(...))
(
shared_ptr
也是最常用的智能指針類模闆),其中
Class
BaseClass
EuropeanExercise
Exercise
的派生類。這類代碼在 Python 中統一改寫成聲明對象的形式——
object = Class(...)
,因為智能指針通常被視為一個對象。
經驗 6:對于智能指針,
shared_ptr<BaseClass> object(new Class(...))
object = Class(...)
Handle<Quote> underlyingH(
ext::shared_ptr<Quote>(new SimpleQuote(underlying)));
underlyingH = ql.QuoteHandle(ql.SimpleQuote(underlying))
Quote
類和
Handle
模闆是 QuantLib 中最常用到的兩個類(模闆),它們通常充當“觀察者模式”中被觀察的一方,一般被當做參數來配置更複雜類的執行個體。
Quote
類接受一個浮點數做參數,而
Handle
模闆接受一個智能指針。當使用者修改
Quote
執行個體的值,或
Handle
執行個體指向的指針之後,那些接受過這些執行個體的複雜類對象會接到通知,并自動觸發相關計算。這個機制非常贊!
關于
Quote
的具體使用案例,詳情可以參考《
Quote
帶來的便利》。
QuantLib 的 Python 接口已經包裝了
Handle
模闆的一些執行個體化,例如
QuoteHandle
和下面将要看到的
YieldTermStructureHandle
,這些類有一緻的命名格式——
ClassHandle
還是那句話,C++ 模闆的執行個體化實際上就是一個具體的類,是以,這部分代碼的改寫方法遵循經驗 1 和經驗 6。
// bootstrap the yield/dividend/vol curves
Handle<YieldTermStructure> flatTermStructure(
ext::shared_ptr<YieldTermStructure>(
new FlatForward(settlementDate, riskFreeRate, dayCounter)));
Handle<YieldTermStructure> flatDividendTS(
ext::shared_ptr<YieldTermStructure>(
new FlatForward(settlementDate, dividendYield, dayCounter)));
Handle<BlackVolTermStructure> flatVolTS(
ext::shared_ptr<BlackVolTermStructure>(
new BlackConstantVol(
settlementDate, calendar, volatility, dayCounter)));
ext::shared_ptr<StrikedTypePayoff> payoff(
new PlainVanillaPayoff(type, strike));
ext::shared_ptr<BlackScholesMertonProcess> bsmProcess(
new BlackScholesMertonProcess(
underlyingH, flatDividendTS, flatTermStructure, flatVolTS));
// options
VanillaOption europeanOption(payoff, europeanExercise);
VanillaOption bermudanOption(payoff, bermudanExercise);
VanillaOption americanOption(payoff, americanExercise);
// Analytic formulas:
// Black-Scholes for European
method = "Black-Scholes";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new AnalyticEuropeanEngine(bsmProcess)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// semi-analytic Heston for European
method = "Heston semi-analytic";
ext::shared_ptr<HestonProcess> hestonProcess(
new HestonProcess(
flatTermStructure, flatDividendTS, underlyingH,
volatility * volatility, 1.0, volatility * volatility, 0.001, 0.0));
ext::shared_ptr<HestonModel> hestonModel(
new HestonModel(hestonProcess));
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new AnalyticHestonEngine(hestonModel)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// semi-analytic Bates for European
method = "Bates semi-analytic";
ext::shared_ptr<BatesProcess> batesProcess(
new BatesProcess(
flatTermStructure, flatDividendTS, underlyingH,
volatility * volatility, 1.0, volatility * volatility,
0.001, 0.0, 1e-14, 1e-14, 1e-14));
ext::shared_ptr<BatesModel> batesModel(
new BatesModel(batesProcess));
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(new BatesEngine(batesModel)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// Barone-Adesi and Whaley approximation for American
method = "Barone-Adesi/Whaley";
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BaroneAdesiWhaleyApproximationEngine(bsmProcess)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Bjerksund and Stensland approximation for American
method = "Bjerksund/Stensland";
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BjerksundStenslandApproximationEngine(bsmProcess)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Integral
method = "Integral";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new IntegralEngine(bsmProcess)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// Finite differences
Size timeSteps = 801;
method = "Finite differences";
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine> fdengine =
ext::make_shared<FdBlackScholesVanillaEngine>(
bsmProcess, timeSteps, timeSteps - 1);
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine);
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine);
americanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine);
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
# bootstrap the yield/dividend/vol curves
flatTermStructure = ql.YieldTermStructureHandle(
ql.FlatForward(settlementDate, riskFreeRate, dayCounter))
flatDividendTS = ql.YieldTermStructureHandle(
ql.FlatForward(settlementDate, dividendYield, dayCounter))
flatVolTS = ql.BlackVolTermStructureHandle(
ql.BlackConstantVol(
settlementDate, calendar, volatility, dayCounter))
payoff = ql.PlainVanillaPayoff(optType, strike)
bsmProcess = ql.BlackScholesMertonProcess(
underlyingH, flatDividendTS, flatTermStructure, flatVolTS)
# options
europeanOption = ql.VanillaOption(payoff, europeanExercise)
bermudanOption = ql.VanillaOption(payoff, bermudanExercise)
americanOption = ql.VanillaOption(payoff, americanExercise)
# Analytic formulas:
# Black-Scholes for European
method = 'Black-Scholes'
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.AnalyticEuropeanEngine(bsmProcess))
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# semi-analytic Heston for European
method = 'Heston semi-analytic'
hestonProcess = ql.HestonProcess(
flatTermStructure, flatDividendTS, underlyingH,
volatility * volatility, 1.0, volatility * volatility, 0.001, 0.0)
hestonModel = ql.HestonModel(hestonProcess)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.AnalyticHestonEngine(hestonModel))
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# semi-analytic Bates for European
method = 'Bates semi-analytic'
batesProcess = ql.BatesProcess(
flatTermStructure, flatDividendTS, underlyingH,
volatility * volatility, 1.0, volatility * volatility,
0.001, 0.0, 1e-14, 1e-14, 1e-14)
batesModel = ql.BatesModel(batesProcess)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.BatesEngine(batesModel))
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# Barone-Adesi and Whaley approximation for American
method = 'Barone-Adesi/Whaley'
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.BaroneAdesiWhaleyEngine(bsmProcess))
tab.add_row([method, 'N/A', 'N/A', americanOption.NPV()])
# Bjerksund and Stensland approximation for American
method = 'Bjerksund/Stensland'
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.BjerksundStenslandEngine(bsmProcess))
tab.add_row([method, 'N/A', 'N/A', americanOption.NPV()])
# Integral
method = 'Integral'
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ql.IntegralEngine(bsmProcess))
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# Finite differences
timeSteps = 801
method = 'Finite differences'
fdengine = ql.FdBlackScholesVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps, timeSteps - 1)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(fdengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
這部分代碼的改寫沒什麼新意,需要注意的是,某些非模闆類在被包裝時會被重命名,例如
BaroneAdesiWhaleyApproximationEngine
被重命名為
BaroneAdesiWhaleyEngine
。如果使用者根據前面的 6 條經驗找不到 Python 接口中的對應物,那麼,要改寫的 C++ 代碼可能遇到了重命名的情況。這時,使用者需要到 QuantLib-SWIG 的接口檔案中查找 C++ 類(結構體)或函數,看看有沒有被重命名。繼續前面的例子,SWIG 代碼
%rename(BaroneAdesiWhaleyEngine) BaroneAdesiWhaleyApproximationEngine;
表明
BaroneAdesiWhaleyApproximationEngine
BaroneAdesiWhaleyEngine
經驗 7:疑似遇到重命名的情況(常見于名字特别長的類),到 QuantLib-SWIG 的接口檔案中查找重命名指令。
// Binomial method: Jarrow-Rudd
method = "Binomial Jarrow-Rudd";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<JarrowRudd>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<JarrowRudd>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<JarrowRudd>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Cox-Ross-Rubinstein
method = "Binomial Cox-Ross-Rubinstein";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<CoxRossRubinstein>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<CoxRossRubinstein>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<CoxRossRubinstein>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Additive equiprobabilities
method = "Additive equiprobabilities";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<AdditiveEQPBinomialTree>(
bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<AdditiveEQPBinomialTree>(
bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<AdditiveEQPBinomialTree>(
bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Binomial Trigeorgis
method = "Binomial Trigeorgis";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Trigeorgis>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Trigeorgis>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Trigeorgis>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Binomial Tian
method = "Binomial Tian";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Tian>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Tian>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Tian>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Binomial Leisen-Reimer
method = "Binomial Leisen-Reimer";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<LeisenReimer>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<LeisenReimer>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<LeisenReimer>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
// Binomial method: Binomial Joshi
method = "Binomial Joshi";
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Joshi4>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Joshi4>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
americanOption.setPricingEngine(
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine>(
new BinomialVanillaEngine<Joshi4>(bsmProcess, timeSteps)));
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << bermudanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
# Binomial method: Jarrow-Rudd
method = 'Binomial Jarrow-Rudd'
jrengine = ql.BinomialJRVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(jrengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(jrengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(jrengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Cox-Ross-Rubinstein
method = 'Binomial Cox-Ross-Rubinstein'
crrengine = ql.BinomialCRRVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(crrengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(crrengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(crrengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Additive equiprobabilities
method = 'Additive equiprobabilities'
eqpengine = ql.BinomialEQPVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(eqpengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(eqpengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(eqpengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Binomial Trigeorgis
method = 'Binomial Trigeorgis'
trengine = ql.BinomialTrigeorgisVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(trengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(trengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(trengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Binomial Tian
method = 'Binomial Tian'
tiengine = ql.BinomialTianVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(tiengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(tiengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(tiengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Binomial Leisen-Reimer
method = 'Binomial Leisen-Reimer'
lrengine = ql.BinomialLRVanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(lrengine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(lrengine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(lrengine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
# Binomial method: Binomial Joshi
method = 'Binomial Joshi'
j4engine = ql.BinomialJ4VanillaEngine(bsmProcess, timeSteps)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(j4engine)
bermudanOption.setPricingEngine(j4engine)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(j4engine)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), bermudanOption.NPV(), americanOption.NPV()])
對于 C++ 中的模闆,SWIG 在包裝 Python 接口時隻包裝模闆的執行個體化,并且會為模闆的執行個體化取一個新名字。這時,使用者需要到 QuantLib-SWIG 的接口檔案中查找模闆的執行個體化,看看取了什麼新名字。繼續前面的例子,SWIG 代碼
%template(BinomialJRVanillaEngine) BinomialVanillaEngine<JarrowRudd>;
表示
BinomialVanillaEngine<JarrowRudd>
在 Python 中對應的類叫做
BinomialJRVanillaEngine
經驗 8:遇到模闆執行個體化的情況,到 QuantLib-SWIG 的接口檔案中查找執行個體化後新的類名。
// Monte Carlo Method: MC (crude)
timeSteps = 1;
method = "MC (crude)";
Size mcSeed = 42;
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine> mcengine1;
mcengine1 = MakeMCEuropeanEngine<PseudoRandom>(
bsmProcess)
.withSteps(timeSteps)
.withAbsoluteTolerance(0.02)
.withSeed(mcSeed);
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine1);
// Real errorEstimate = europeanOption.errorEstimate();
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// Monte Carlo Method: QMC (Sobol)
method = "QMC (Sobol)";
Size nSamples = 32768; // 2^15
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine> mcengine2;
mcengine2 = MakeMCEuropeanEngine<LowDiscrepancy>(
bsmProcess)
.withSteps(timeSteps)
.withSamples(nSamples);
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine2);
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << europeanOption.NPV()
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::endl;
// Monte Carlo Method: MC (Longstaff Schwartz)
method = "MC (Longstaff Schwartz)";
ext::shared_ptr<PricingEngine> mcengine3;
mcengine3 = MakeMCAmericanEngine<PseudoRandom>(
bsmProcess)
.withSteps(100)
.withAntitheticVariate()
.withCalibrationSamples(4096)
.withAbsoluteTolerance(0.02)
.withSeed(mcSeed);
americanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine3);
std::cout << std::setw(widths[0]) << std::left << method
<< std::fixed
<< std::setw(widths[1]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[2]) << std::left << "N/A"
<< std::setw(widths[3]) << std::left << americanOption.NPV()
<< std::endl;
timeSteps = 1
# Monte Carlo Method: MC (crude)
method = 'MC (crude)'
mcSeed = 42
mcengine1 = ql.MCPREuropeanEngine(
bsmProcess,
timeSteps=timeSteps,
requiredTolerance=0.02,
seed=mcSeed)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine1)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# Monte Carlo Method: QMC (Sobol)
method = 'QMC (Sobol)'
nSamples = 32768 # 2^15
mcengine2 = ql.MCLDEuropeanEngine(
bsmProcess,
timeSteps=timeSteps,
requiredSamples=nSamples)
europeanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine2)
tab.add_row([method, europeanOption.NPV(), 'N/A', 'N/A'])
# Monte Carlo Method: MC (Longstaff Schwartz)
method = 'MC (Longstaff Schwartz)'
mcengine3 = ql.MCPRAmericanEngine(
bsmProcess,
timeSteps=100,
antitheticVariate=True,
nCalibrationSamples=4096,
requiredTolerance=0.02,
seed=mcSeed)
americanOption.setPricingEngine(mcengine3)
tab.add_row([method, 'N/A', 'N/A', americanOption.NPV()])
tab.float_format = '.6'
tab.align = 'l'
print(tab)
MakeMCEuropeanEngine<PseudoRandom>
是 QuantLib 中工廠模式的一個實作,對于擁有較多預設參數的類,QuantLib 會提供一個對應的工廠類,使用者借助工廠類“制造”一個半成品對象,并通過一組成員函數以流水線的方式配置這個半成品的參數,以實作對預設參數的靈活配置。這些流水線函數有一緻的命名格式——
withArgument
,
Argument
通常是某個預設參數的名字。這套機制也被稱為“命名參數慣用法”。這些工廠類有一緻的命名規範——
MakeClass
Class
是一個類的名字或執行個體化的模闆,
MakeClass
将制造出一個
Class
對象。
Python 中存在“關鍵字參數”的機制,是以,上述“流水線函數”顯得非常笨拙,對于這類代碼的改寫,使用者隻要知道“
MakeClass
Class
對象”這一點,并了解流水線函數所配置的參數,然後應用前面總結的 8 條經驗就可以成功改寫。
經驗 9:名為的工廠類将制造出一個
MakeClass
對象,後續的成員函數表示配置的參數。
Class
C++ 代碼運作結果:
Option type = Put
Maturity = May 17th, 1999
Underlying price = 36
Strike = 40
Risk-free interest rate = 6.000000 %
Dividend yield = 0.000000 %
Volatility = 20.000000 %
Method European Bermudan American
Black-Scholes 3.844308 N/A N/A
Heston semi-analytic 3.844306 N/A N/A
Bates semi-analytic 3.844306 N/A N/A
Barone-Adesi/Whaley N/A N/A 4.459628
Bjerksund/Stensland N/A N/A 4.453064
Integral 3.844309 N/A N/A
Finite differences 3.844330 4.360765 4.486113
Binomial Jarrow-Rudd 3.844132 4.361174 4.486552
Binomial Cox-Ross-Rubinstein 3.843504 4.360861 4.486415
Additive equiprobabilities 3.836911 4.354455 4.480097
Binomial Trigeorgis 3.843557 4.360909 4.486461
Binomial Tian 3.844171 4.361176 4.486413
Binomial Leisen-Reimer 3.844308 4.360713 4.486076
Binomial Joshi 3.844308 4.360713 4.486076
MC (crude) 3.834522 N/A N/A
QMC (Sobol) 3.844613 N/A N/A
MC (Longstaff Schwartz) N/A N/A 4.456935
Python 程式運作結果:
Option type = -1
Maturity = May 17th, 1999
Underlying price = 36.0
Strike = 40.0
Risk-free interest rate = 6.000000%
Dividend yield = 0.000000%
Volatility = 20.000000%
+------------------------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Method | European | Bermudan | American |
+------------------------------+----------+----------+----------+
| Black-Scholes | 3.844308 | N/A | N/A |
| Heston semi-analytic | 3.844306 | N/A | N/A |
| Bates semi-analytic | 3.844306 | N/A | N/A |
| Barone-Adesi/Whaley | N/A | N/A | 4.459628 |
| Bjerksund/Stensland | N/A | N/A | 4.453064 |
| Integral | 3.844309 | N/A | N/A |
| Finite differences | 3.844330 | 4.360765 | 4.486113 |
| Binomial Jarrow-Rudd | 3.844132 | 4.361174 | 4.486552 |
| Binomial Cox-Ross-Rubinstein | 3.843504 | 4.360861 | 4.486415 |
| Additive equiprobabilities | 3.836911 | 4.354455 | 4.480097 |
| Binomial Trigeorgis | 3.843557 | 4.360909 | 4.486461 |
| Binomial Tian | 3.844171 | 4.361176 | 4.486413 |
| Binomial Leisen-Reimer | 3.844308 | 4.360713 | 4.486076 |
| Binomial Joshi | 3.844308 | 4.360713 | 4.486076 |
| MC (crude) | 3.834522 | N/A | N/A |
| QMC (Sobol) | 3.844613 | N/A | N/A |
| MC (Longstaff Schwartz) | N/A | N/A | 4.456935 |
+------------------------------+----------+----------+----------+
完全一樣!
-
BaseClass object = Class(...)
Class object(...)
object = Class(...)
-
Settings::instance()
evaluationDate()
property
-
Class::Enum object(Class::element)
object = Class.element
-
Type object = value
object = value
-
Period
TimeUnit
-
shared_ptr<BaseClass> object(new Class(...))
object = Class(...)
-
MakeClass
Class
需要注意的是,QuantLib 中并非所有的功能都有對應的 Python 接口,如果使用者需要的功能未被包裝,使用者隻好修改 SWIG 代碼,自行生成 Python 接口,可以參考一下文章:
- 《自己動手封裝 Python 接口(1)》
- 《自己動手封裝 Python 接口(2)》
- 《自己動手封裝 Python 接口(3)》
《QuantLib 金融計算》系列合集
★ 持續學習 ★ 堅持創作 ★