一、問題由來
這是我同僚問我的一個問題,在網上看到了如下案例,本案例RC RR都可以出現,其實這個死鎖原因也比較簡單,我們來具體看看:
構造資料
CREATE database deadlock_test;
use deadlock_test;
CREATE TABLE `push_token` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`token` varchar(128) NOT NULL COMMENT 'push token',
`app_id` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'appid',
`deleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL COMMENT '是否已删除 0:否 1:是',
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `uk_token_appid` (`token`,`app_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=3384 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='pushtoken表';
insert into push_token (id, token, app_id, deleted) values(1,"token1",1,0);
操作資料
|s1(TRX_ID367661)|s2(TRX_ID367662)|s3(TRX_ID367663)|
|-|-|-|
|begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';|||
||begin; DELETE FROM push_token WHERE id IN (1);||
|||begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';|
|commit;|||
|Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)| Query OK, 1 row affected (17.32 sec)| ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction|
二、分析方法
我使用的分析方法是把整個加鎖的日志列印出來,當然需要用到我自己做了輸出修改的一個版本,如下:
https://github.com/gaopengcarl/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22這個版本我打開了的日志記錄參數如下:
mysql> show variables like '%gaopeng%';
+--------------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name | Value |
+--------------------------------+-------+
| gaopeng_mdl_detail | OFF |
| innodb_gaopeng_row_lock_detail | ON |
+--------------------------------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
這樣大部分的Innodb加鎖記錄都會記錄到errlog日志了。好了下面我詳細分析一下日志:
三、分析過程
初始化的情況整個表隻有1條記錄,本表包含一個主鍵和一個唯一鍵。
1. s1(TRX_ID367661) 執行語句
begin;
UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';
日志輸出:
2019-08-18T19:10:05.117317+08:00 6 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367661) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:05.117714+08:00 6 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367661) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 000000059c2c; asc ,;;
2: len 7; hex bf000000420110; asc B ;;
3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
5: len 1; hex 80; asc ;;
我們看到主鍵和唯一鍵都加鎖了,模式為LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|如下圖:
并且這個時候資料實際上是标記删除狀态。
2. s2(TRX_ID367662) 執行語句
begin;DELETE FROM push_token WHERE id IN (1);
2019-08-18T19:10:22.751467+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc -;;
2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @ * ;;
3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
5: len 1; hex 81; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:22.752753+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367662) is blocked!!!!!
這個時候S2需要擷取主鍵上的:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP| 鎖,是以被堵塞了如下圖:
3. s3(TRX_ID367663) 執行語句
begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';
019-08-18T19:10:30.822111+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:30.918248+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367663) is blocked!!!!!
這個時候S3需要擷取唯一鍵上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP 鎖,是以被堵塞了如下圖:
4. s1(TRX_ID367661) 執行語句
這一步完成後死鎖出現。
commit;
日志輸出如下:
367663和367662各自擷取需要的鎖
2019-08-18T19:10:36.566733+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.568711+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc -;;
2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @ * ;;
3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
5: len 1; hex 81; asc ;;
367663擷取主鍵鎖堵塞、367662擷取唯一鍵鎖堵塞,死鎖形成
2019-08-18T19:10:36.570313+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc -;;
2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @ * ;;
3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
5: len 1; hex 81; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.571199+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367663) is blocked!!!!!
2019-08-18T19:10:36.572481+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.573073+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: Transactions deadlock detected, dumping detailed information.
完成這一步 s1實際上釋放了鎖, 然後我們首先看到s2擷取了主鍵上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP鎖,s3擷取了唯一鍵上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP 鎖。但是随後s3擷取主鍵上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP鎖堵塞,s2擷取唯一鍵上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP鎖堵塞。是以死鎖形成,如下圖:
好了我們看到了死鎖就這樣出現。整個分析過程我們隻要看到加鎖的日志實際上很容易就分析得出來。
最後歡迎關注我的專欄《深入了解MySQL主從原理 32講》: