天天看点

MySQL:死锁一例

一、问题由来

这是我同事问我的一个问题,在网上看到了如下案例,本案例RC RR都可以出现,其实这个死锁原因也比较简单,我们来具体看看:

构造数据
CREATE database deadlock_test;
use deadlock_test;
CREATE TABLE `push_token` (
  `id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `token` varchar(128) NOT NULL COMMENT 'push token',
  `app_id` varchar(128) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'appid',
  `deleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL COMMENT '是否已删除 0:否 1:是',
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   UNIQUE KEY `uk_token_appid` (`token`,`app_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=3384 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='pushtoken表';

insert into push_token (id, token, app_id, deleted) values(1,"token1",1,0);           
操作数据

|s1(TRX_ID367661)|s2(TRX_ID367662)|s3(TRX_ID367663)|

|-|-|-|

|begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';|||

||begin; DELETE FROM push_token WHERE id IN (1);||

|||begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';|

|commit;|||

|Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)| Query OK, 1 row affected (17.32 sec)| ERROR 1213 (40001): Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction|

二、分析方法

我使用的分析方法是把整个加锁的日志打印出来,当然需要用到我自己做了输出修改的一个版本,如下:

https://github.com/gaopengcarl/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22

这个版本我打开了的日志记录参数如下:

mysql> show variables like '%gaopeng%';
+--------------------------------+-------+
| Variable_name                  | Value |
+--------------------------------+-------+
| gaopeng_mdl_detail             | OFF   |
| innodb_gaopeng_row_lock_detail | ON    |
+--------------------------------+-------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)           

这样大部分的Innodb加锁记录都会记录到errlog日志了。好了下面我详细分析一下日志:

三、分析过程

初始化的情况整个表只有1条记录,本表包含一个主键和一个唯一键。

1. s1(TRX_ID367661) 执行语句

begin;
UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';           

日志输出:

2019-08-18T19:10:05.117317+08:00 6 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367661) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:05.117714+08:00 6 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367661) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000059c2c; asc      ,;;
 2: len 7; hex bf000000420110; asc     B  ;;
 3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 5: len 1; hex 80; asc  ;;           

我们看到主键和唯一键都加锁了,模式为LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|如下图:

并且这个时候数据实际上是标记删除状态。

2. s2(TRX_ID367662) 执行语句

begin;DELETE FROM push_token WHERE id IN (1);
           
2019-08-18T19:10:22.751467+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc      -;;
 2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @   *  ;;
 3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 5: len 1; hex 81; asc  ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:22.752753+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367662) is blocked!!!!!           

这个时候S2需要获取主键上的:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP| 锁,因此被堵塞了如下图:

3. s3(TRX_ID367663) 执行语句

begin; UPDATE push_token SET deleted = 1 WHERE token = 'token1' AND app_id = '1';
           
019-08-18T19:10:30.822111+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:30.918248+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367663) is blocked!!!!!
           

这个时候S3需要获取唯一键上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP 锁,因此被堵塞了如下图:

4. s1(TRX_ID367661) 执行语句

这一步完成后死锁出现。

commit;           

日志输出如下:

367663和367662各自获取需要的锁

2019-08-18T19:10:36.566733+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.568711+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc      -;;
 2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @   *  ;;
 3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 5: len 1; hex 81; asc  ;;

367663获取主键锁堵塞、367662获取唯一键锁堵塞,死锁形成
2019-08-18T19:10:36.570313+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367663) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:PRIMARY space_id: 449 page_id:3 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 6; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
 1: len 6; hex 000000059c2d; asc      -;;
 2: len 7; hex 400000002a1dc8; asc @   *  ;;
 3: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 4: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 5: len 1; hex 81; asc  ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.571199+08:00 8 [Note] InnoDB: Trx(367663) is blocked!!!!!
2019-08-18T19:10:36.572481+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: TRX ID:(367662) table:deadlock_test/push_token index:uk_token_appid space_id: 449 page_id:4 heap_no:2 row lock mode:LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP|
PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 3; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 6; hex 746f6b656e31; asc token1;;
 1: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 2: len 8; hex 8000000000000001; asc         ;;
2019-08-18T19:10:36.573073+08:00 9 [Note] InnoDB: Transactions deadlock detected, dumping detailed information.           

完成这一步 s1实际上释放了锁, 然后我们首先看到s2获取了主键上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP锁,s3获取了唯一键上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP 锁。但是随后s3获取主键上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP锁堵塞,s2获取唯一键上的LOCK_X|LOCK_NOT_GAP锁堵塞。因此死锁形成,如下图:

好了我们看到了死锁就这样出现。整个分析过程我们只要看到加锁的日志实际上很容易就分析得出来。

最后欢迎关注我的专栏《深入理解MySQL主从原理 32讲》:

继续阅读