【Technology041】Feeling about no-leader group discussion
Barack
——I think it’s more unfair than one on one interview.
Today, I take part in two no-leader group discussion. One is for the credit card in China Merchants Bank. Another one is for the Jindong. I think there is no pity for me if I judge my performance.
I lead the discussion process; I watch on the time; I encourage others to speak and I succeed in making the presentation on behalf of the whole team. I think my score should be over the median.
However, for the credit card in China Merchants Bank. There are 40 people and 4 are rejected after the no-leader group discussion. Unfortunately, I am one of the four. It’s really out of my expectation.
The HR is a freshman, she told me that she has listened to the discussion of the two judgers. One of them appreciates me a lot. She thinks that I show the leadership and can give others to speak.
But the other one doesn’t think so. She regards me as a deliberate and pretentious guy. She also thinks my lack of logic. I don’t feel too much pity for the failure but more about the unfairness of the judge.
If only ten can be accepted, I think it’s reasonable to reject me. But since only one of them is rejected, I think it’s a little fair decision to kick me out of the game.
For the no-leader group discussion in Jindong. Three of the eight candidates can pass. A girl whom I think do a good job is rejected. But a boy whom I think is not so talented is accepted.
Later on, I realize that the boy has a better school. So, you are judged for some reason that has nothing to do with your performance in the no-leader group discussion.
To some degree, I think it’s good not to go to such a company. If they can not even show enough profession and fairness during recruitment, how can I suppose that they can provide those things when I become stuff?
2019/10/26