"Director Please Advise" this variety show, although it is not a success at present (because only the first issue can not further explain the problem), but Taro Jun is interested in it, the main reason is also to see The front and back of China's film and television industry and more diversified styles.
A total of four directors' short films were broadcast throughout the first episode, namely Xiang Guoqiang, Bao Bell, Bi Zhifei and Liang Long.
Taro Jun originally thought that the controversy between the producers and the film troupe triggered by Xiang Guoqiang and Bao Bell's short film was already the "highlight" of the entire first issue, but what he did not expect was that the producers and the group evaluated Bi Zhifei and Liang Long more "wonderfully".
I believe that netizens who love surfing have seen the entry "Li Chengru does not recognize that the spring of the new small town is Bi Zhifei's work" on the hot search, and should also see the fragment of Li Chengru's teacher angry at Bi Zhifei in the entry.
Speaking of director Bi Zhifei, Taro Jun's first impression of him is that his attitude is very good, but he gradually finds that he does not know whether it is intentional or unintentional, but it is always "a particularly good attitude, but it is not changed."
From "Dream Showbiz" to "Director Please Advise", director Bi Zhifei has had some controversies during the period, which exists in his comments on the movie and his own complaints when participating in a spitting program, and many people say that he has mastered the "traffic code".
In "Director Please Advise", director Bi Zhifei chose to adapt the IP is "Spring in a Small Town", and many people were surprised when he chose this work, and Teacher Li Chengru even said "I finally know why your work has 2.2 points".
Judging from the results of its adaptation of "Spring in a New Small Town", although it won this pk in the rating, it also caused an "outbreak" of emotions on the spot.
Taro Jun watched Bi Dao's short film, not without merit, the picture composition is indeed very beautiful, the story can also reach the passing line, but the biggest problem is like the live producer, the film group, including Li Chengru teacher said, there is no innovation, just doing the depiction of the study.
Looking at what Teacher Li Chengru, Teacher Fang Li and others have said, it can be understood that as a director, Bi Dao seems to have no theory but no creativity and insufficient practice.
Speaking of the work of director Liang Long, adapted from the IP "Crazy Alien", it was stopped before it was finished.
What is even more amazing about this movie is that the evaluation given by the public judges on the spot is very low, the evaluation given by the professional judges is very high, and the producers are also polarized and differentiated.
Taro Jun believes that Liang Long's director of this short film is actually a very "Liang Long" style. Just like the music created by the second-hand rose band, there is humor, absurdity, unexpectedness, and attitude expression.
Director Liang Long's work may not be suitable for sitting in the cinema, but it is also not impossible to try as a pioneer.
The songs of second-hand roses are not what everyone will like and understand, but they do have a part of the audience, which can be understood and seen clearly, so they like it.
Therefore, it is not very surprising that there is such a big polarization in the work of director Liang Long.
However, the scene between the professional film team and the public judges for this short film sword and light sword shadow, you come and go, really makes Taro Jun breathtaking, and also triggers some thinking about Taro Jun as an audience:
As a film critic teacher said, we always think that what we can't understand is "pretend", and what we can easily understand and can't see is "low".
In fact, if you don't understand it for a while, as the film critic said, then look at other people's interpretations, and finally decide whether you really don't like this work, at least you can avoid our "impulse".
And people will change, there are some works even if you don't like it at the moment, wait until three or five years later, maybe because the situation is adapting, you will have a new understanding?
In the pk of director Bi Zhifei and director Liang Long, although director Bi Zhifei's vote is higher and director Liang Long's vote is slightly lower, there is no winner in this pk, because both people are seated in the pending seat.
However, from the works of the four directors of the first episode of the complete "Director Please Advise" program and the controversy on the spot, Taro Jun can be completely certain of one thing: the program team has used the intentions used in the program to create "contradictions and conflicts".
Just like a play within a play, the play in the play is the director's film, and the outer layer of the scene is all kinds of contradictions and conflicts cut out by the program team, and the more interesting things, the most essential part may be in the 'next trailer'.
So Taro Jun still wants to ask, what is the purpose of the show?
Is it for the director? For movies? Or is it to create a topic?
If it is the last kind, there is only one regret to say.
(Text/Taro Circle) Statement: Image source network, push this article is only for readers to learn and communicate, not for commercial use. If there is any infringement, please contact and delete it immediately. It's not easy to create, remember to pay attention to it.