I know that after the publication of the manuscript "Diana's "Warm Nephrite Gate" Incident Diana Admitted Several Relationships", it will make many people who like, respect, and worship Princess Diana extremely uncomfortable, and even say that they are a little hurt, including myself. Halfway through this article, I also hesitated when I found out that in the BBC interview, Diana confessed her relationship with Hewitt. Do you want to write it according to the truth you found, or do you go according to the original plan, not mentioning that you and Hewitt once had a relationship?
Diana always involuntarily showed a melancholy look in public
The manuscript was shelved for a few days halfway through. Finally, I thought, I'm not writing fiction, I can fiction. It should be fact-keeping at all times. So, the decision is still to respect the facts, finish this manuscript, and send it out. I felt uncomfortable for a day after I sent it out. There are multiple reasons for the discomfort. First of all, the facts are different from what I originally thought. However, based on Diana's situation at the time, I can fully understand that Diana had a new relationship under the suffocating marriage at that time. The question is, is it acceptable to readers? Am I posting this article ruining Diana's image of perfection in people's minds? Therefore, after the manuscript was published, my heart was still very entangled. However, I later looked at the audience comments about this video.
I read hundreds of messages above, searched for half a day, and there was not a single comment that accused and insulted her about her extramarital affair. Instead, it increased sympathy for her. At the same time, it also increased the anger against the royal family.
I think it is precisely because there is a consensus that Diana's extramarital affair is the result of Charles and Camilla's extramarital affair and Charles's long-term cold violence against Diana, and the entire royal family knows the problems of their marriage and treats her with indifference. In short, it was forced by Charles and the royal family.
Here are the first two pages of comments that I took after people watched The video of Diana's interview with the BBC.
Nancy Waller Watching this (video) I was sadly in tears, so sad.
Jerri bryson I always felt as if her death was not investigated? Here she seemed to be terrified that something could happen to her, that her life should not have been taken away so quickly.
Lisaann Wiggins Watching this video my thought is that Diana knows that Diana is a threat to the Queen, and it was the Royal Family that made her a strong person, a threat. So now I'm more convinced that they killed her so that the threat would disappear.
... ... (This is just the first three translations of the comment below)
Audience comments
The first comment below: What a shameful Charles, never really mature enough to understand Diana's feelings and why she would cry without moving...
Because of the too many comments, the above is a screenshot of the first three pages.
Diana burst into tears
Many people watched the video and believed that Diana was murdered, so what exactly did Diana say in this interview, which is believed to be the cause of her death?
Bassel asked, "What did you do to get yourself through that tough moment and then get yourself back on your feet?"
Diana had a smile on her face in front of the public, but it was hard to hide her sadness when she turned her back
Diana: "Obviously there were a lot of tears in there, and help. But that was the wrong way to ask for help, when I was a little girl. So it only makes people think that you are a howling wolf who wants to attract the attention of others. But, in fact, I cried as a way of venting myself, to get myself back on my feet and continue to take on my responsibilities as a mother, wife, and princess. Actually, it really worked for me. Later, I took a swim, and I swam a lot.
Bassel asked, "Do you think you are responsible for the failure of your marriage?" ”
Diana: "I'm responsible, I'm absolutely responsible, I'm half responsible. But I am not fully responsible. In the first difficult moments I took the wrong side. We both made mistakes (referring to the extramarital affair between her and Hewitt, for more information, please see the previous article, which will not be repeated here).
Probably only people who know the real situation know that the responsibility is not her, but she said in front of the media that she has half the responsibility. This shows her sincerity and generosity, and at the same time saves face for Charles.
Since Charles and Diane announced their separation, first of all, Diana said that her phone was being monitored, letters were intercepted, "warm nephrite doors" (the eavesdropping information was that Gilbert was in love with Diana, and Diana was just a good friend to him), and rumors that 300 calls to Mr. Hall a day were all made by Charles in order to have more trump cards in his hand (to defeat her).
When Bassell asked Diana, why did the other party do that? Can't we let her (referring to Diana) leave quietly? She replied that it was fear. The problem is that she's not leaving, she's still going to do something (charity) and she still has two children to raise. (Referring to Diana herself, all quoted in the third person here)
Many children in Angola have been seen to have their legs broken and lost their lives by landmines left over from history have been called for and advocated for the establishment of mine protection zones
Because what Diana did was to help the poorest people at the bottom, not only in Britain, but also in other countries of the world. The royal family, on the other hand, had maintained a close relationship with ordinary people, and would not be as close to the poor as Diana did. In this respect, Diana was more popular than the people of the royal family.
Below Diana switched back to the first person.
"The other side thinks that what I am doing is a threat to them, a threat to the royal family. How do I get back? That's my son's future! ”
Bassel asked, "Do you think you'll become queen?" Do you think that in the past few years, for people, have you been a qualified princess? ”
Diana smiled softly and replied, "No, no. I want to be the queen in people's hearts. But I don't think I'm going to be queen. I don't think people would want me to be queen either. By people I mean people who broker our marriage (the Queen and Prince Philip). Because they decided I was the loser in this marriage race. Because she does things with her heart, not with her brain (the heart here understands it as conscience, and the brain itself understands it as a trade-off between interests), she often violates the rules (referring to the customs of the royal family). Although, there are many problems with working, and I understand this. But someone has to go out and love people and show concern for them.
In public, they played the role of a loving couple, performing fairy tales of princes and princesses.
"I don't think many people will support me when I do these things."
Bassel asked, "You mean inside the royal family?" ”
Diana: Well, they think I'm a threat in some way. But I'm doing good, and I'm not a destructive person.
Diana: I think every strong woman in history has had to go down a similar path, and I think it's the strength of that strength that creates chaos and fear. ”
"Why is she so powerful? Where does her strength come from? Where will she use it? Why is the public still supporting her? ”
"When I say GP, I mean that when I go to an event, there are always a lot of people there to support."
Diana visited AIDS patients and, for the first time, set up a special AIDS outpatient treatment room in the hospital
Bassel asked: "Do you think there is anything that needs to be changed in the royal family at the moment?" What do you want the monarch to be?
Diana; "Change is always scary, especially when nothing happens. People like to stay the way they are. I understand that very well. But, I firmly believe, there is something that can be changed. This eases the complex relationship between the monarch and the public. I think monarchs and the public can go hand in hand and not be so far away. ”
"I want the monarch to have more contact with people, and I don't mean going around a few laps like riding a bicycle and going through the motions. Rather, it means having a deeper understanding with people. ”
"I'm not saying criticism of the monarch, I'm just passing on what I've chosen for this role and what I see, hear, and feel every day."
Bassel asked, "What have you done to change this?" ”
Diana: "I took William and Harry to visit homeless people and AIDS patients who were dying, and I told them it was cancer. I've taken kids to a lot of places I'm sure anyone of this age in this family hasn't been to.
Diana said very euphemistically in this interview, and it is also a face saver for the royal family. But the meaning is still clear to everyone.
Diana went from a 19-year-old energetic and innocent girl to being thrown into the abyss as she entered marriage. 19 to 25, 6 years old is the flower season girlhood, is the most beautiful period for women, is the period when she should enjoy beautiful love, but she is suffering and suffering.
I believe that if people knew what Diana really went through after marriage, they would admire her and love her as always, just like the audience who left these comments.
As I mentioned in my previous article, the Queen knew that Diana's bulimia was caused by Charles's extramarital affair, and Charles's indifference, and the Queen did not mention it, only blaming Diana's bulimia for affecting Charles's life. This kind of behavior that only counts the results and does not investigate the cause is like, I stabbed you with a knife, why did you bleed, and the blood you shed made me feel uncomfortable.
If we only consider that she has an affair without thinking about what caused her affair, then what is the difference between our behavior and the queen's behavior?
The Queen blamed Diana in order to defend her son, and some of our readers knew the real situation, and what was the purpose of accusing and insulting Diana's behavior without taking the cause and the result? We have to reflect on whether this behavior is something wrong with our cognition.
Although, Diana is no longer there, and she is no longer a princess. But people are willing to call her the eternal princess in people's hearts, and I think the title of princess is no longer as Charles's wife, but as a symbol of a noble position! It is the highest respect for the people who admire the most and love the most in the heart! Therefore, it has long surpassed the status of the princess!
Some of the pictures are from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete