Author | Guardian of culture
Source | Confucius old book network dynamics
"Peach Blossom Fan" was compiled by Kong Shangren himself, and he said in "Peach Blossom Fan End": "Those who read "Peach Blossom Fan" have inscriptions and sayings, which have been recorded before and after. There are also criticisms, there are poems, and the sentences of each fold are batched at the top, the total criticism is at the end, the degree of giving to the heart, the hundred is not lost, all borrow the reader's letter and pen, the paper is full of pages, it is no longer remembered by whom, and now it exists, in order to re-know the love of oneself" ("Peach Blossom Fan", People's Literature Publishing House, April 1, 1959, 1st edition, November 7, 1982 Brush Wang Jisi, Su Huanzhong, Yang Deping henoted). The so-called "give the heart, not lose one", but Kong Shangren's kind words. The criticism in "Dream of the Red Chamber" is actually as Kong Shangren said: "All borrowed from readers to write and write, and the paper is full of pages, and it is no longer written by whom." The difference is that, as Gao Hu and Cheng Weiyuan said in the "Preface" of the "Cheng Jia Ben": "Every time a good deed is copied, placed in the temple market, it is worth dozens of gold, which can be described as a person who does not go away." "The influence and popularity of "Dream of the Red Chamber" at that time far exceeded that of "Peach Blossom Fan", so people competed to copy it, and the fat manuscripts that can be seen now are actually the products of layers of copying by scribes. The same is true of the lipograms, many of which are arbitrarily deleted and added to the vinegar of the scribes; and even the unintentional errors of the scribes, resulting in the phenomenon of inability to read. Comments are the criticisms made by many critics of different interpretations of the text, as well as the post-criticism of the previous batch, more incoherent thinking and the preface does not match the afterword, and some even misinterpret the text. If the author had known, he would certainly not have said like Kong Shangren, "Give your heart to the heart, and you will not lose one." However, the commentators on the compilation of fat have compiled the criticisms made by Zhang Sanlisi and Wang Wuzhao Liu as the criticisms of Li Yanzhai, which makes the reader Yanshi indefensible.
14th
Jia Shu Ben back to the previous batch: Cai Ming is an unvalrown child.
Jia Shu Benmei Commented: Ning Fu is such a big person, Ah Feng is such an identity, is there any reason for the personal servant to answer and communicate with the man in the family? What this author ignores. (Gengchen Benmei criticized as "poop")
Gengchen Benmei Comment: Cai Ming is an unvalrown child, and Ah Feng is easy to enter and exit the envoy. The old man did not see whether it was a man or a woman, and it was ridiculous to refute it indiscriminately.
Gengchen Benmei Criticism: And clearly write the reason why Ah Feng is illiterate. Mid-afternoon spring
In "Dream of the Red Chamber", only Jia Fu can represent the two houses of "Ning and Rong", while "Ning Fu" cannot represent "Rong Fu", and "Ah Feng" is a person of Ning Fu? Wouldn't it be even more ridiculous to argue for half a day without even understanding these issues?
Whether "Caiming" is an unvalrown boy, in fact, there are character coordinates in the text of the novel that can be referred to. "Cai Ming" has appeared since the seventh time, And Ping'er instructed Cai Ming to "send it to the mansion over there for Xiao Rong's grandmother to wear", while "Ming Yan" appeared from the ninth "Naughty Boy Haunting School" as a thug. For example, the 16th time Ming Yan was anxious to tell Bao Yu that Qin Zhong was critically ill, but he could only probe his brain in front of the second door, indicating that Ming Yan could not even enter inside the second door; the 24th time Jia Yun went to the Qi Feng Zhai study outside the Yi Gate to find Bao Yu, and Ming Yan helped him go to the "sentry sentry", waited for half a day, and came back and said: "After waiting for this day, no one came out." Later, he still entrusted Hongyu: "Good girl, you go in and bring a letter." "It shows that The smoke can't even enter the gate of the Grand View Garden." And "Caiming" is different, the 24th time Jia Yun inquired about Feng Jie's return, he wrote a ticket to receive the right card. Outside the courtyard, the order was informed, and Caiming came out; the 42nd time Liu Grandma reminded Sister Feng of a word, so she asked Ping'er to take out the "Jade Box" and ask Cai Ming to read it; on the 45th time on Sister Feng's birthday, his old wife sent steamed buns and other things, and Zhou Rui's dry son lost his hand in a box and sprinkled a courtyard of steamed buns. When the people went, Sister Feng sent Cai Ming to talk about him, and he scolded Cai Ming; the 88th time Sister Feng asked Cai Ming to reconcile the day's fragments and daily accounts. It was nearly two o'clock, and everyone took another break, gossiped a little, and told everyone to rest in peace.
Although the 88th time cannot be used as "evidence in court" for those mainstream red experts who know more about "Dream of the Red Chamber" than Li Yanzhai and even the author, from these narratives in the first 80 times of the text, it is shown that "Caiming" can enter and exit Fengjie's inner chamber at will. Judging from the style and psychological age of the two people, "Ming Yan" and "Cai Ming", it is obvious that "Cai Ming" is much more mature than "Ming Yan". "Ming Yan" is Baoyu's small house, why can't you enter the inner room of Baoyu with female dependents? If "Caiming" is also like "Ming Smoke", why can you enter and exit FengJie's inner room at will?
The 45th time Grandma Lai called Caiyun "Brother Cai" (Grandma Lai said: "Yesterday Grandma sent Brother Cai to reward things, and my grandson prostrated his head upwards on the door"), just as the 35th time Aunt Xue called Sister Feng "Brother Feng" (Aunt Xue said: "I was as old as Brother Feng on that day, I was better than him"), indicating that the personality of "Cai Ming" was like Wang Xifeng's big grin, according to the current words, "female Hanzi" type of handmaiden, which also shows that Wang Xifeng is good at measuring talents and using them. Several people argued for half a day, and didn't they even read the text of the novel?
In recent years, Mr. Wu Mingen's "Red Chamber Dream Fat Review Schoolbook" is very popular with readers, and even more popular than the book of Deng Suifu, the first person of grassroots red studies more than a decade ago, not only several publishing houses competed to publish, but even reprinted one edition. Did Mr. Wu Ming'en examine these three articles as the criticism of Li Yanzhai?
Mr. Wu Ming'en registered with Kong Net around 2010 and 2011, and the English nickname is no longer remembered, but he rarely appears in "Community".
Page 1230 of the 53rd Gengchen Ben Brow Criticism: Since KeQing's death, Jia Rong has not been seen to remarry, and this time there is Rong's wife avoidance, which is an omission in the book. Qi Garden
After Qin Keqing's death from the 13th "Enjoying Strong Life" Xian, Jia Rong's wife was already in the 29th time of the novel text (page 673 of the Gengchen Ben ,"Only to see Jia Zhen and Jia Rong's wife and daughter-in-law coming"), but the 53rd critic said that "it is a missing place in the book". In the words of Yin'er, isn't it "not to regret that you have no insight, but to blame others for ugly words"? Similar phenomena of incoherence of thinking abound in the criticism of "Dream of the Red Chamber".
The 75th Gengchen Benmei Criticism: This passage of child prostitution sentence is too true, but it must not be the god of money, and it should be changed to a confession of guilt.
This eyebrow batch is similar to the handwriting of the 53rd eyebrow batch, but the scribe who collected the "Gengchen Codex" in the library of Beijing Normal University copied this eyebrow batch into a sandwich batch, completely turning it into a fat batch. When Tao Su recorded the criticisms of Jia Shu and Gengchen Ben on the Heji Ben, there were many similar phenomena. When the mainstream red expert masters examine the fat batch, they only judge from the style, tone, and handwriting. Mr. Wu Ming'en included the 75th eyebrow batch, but discarded the 53rd eyebrow criticism and said: "This eyebrow batch is different from the original copy of the original handwriting, and should be approved by posterity." But some people think that it is the original batch, and 'seems to be the tone of the author's elders.' 'Save it.' "Isn't this the same as the United States and other Western institutions, when tracing the origin of the new crown, have hyped up the evidence in favor of their own side; the collective silence of the evidence against their own side? In Mr. Feng Qiyong, the highest authority of red studies, in his "Re-examination and Criticism of the Dream of the Red Chamber", there are many criticisms that imitate the tone of Li Yanzhai, and after a few years, will they not become fat batches?
1st time
Jia Shu Ben Mei Criticism: The opening volume is an intention, which really breaks the historical novel. Reading his pen is "Zhuangzi" and "Leaving sorrow". Si is also too much.
"Si Yi is too much", these four words are the posterity to refute the previous criticism. This also shows that the criticism of the Jia Shu Ben is only copied from other base books, and it is not distinguished between black and white, and the gourd is drawn in the same way, which makes people mistakenly think that it is the same person's one-shot comment.
2nd time
The language is too annoying and impatient. The ancients "cherished ink like gold", and looked at this as ink as earth. Even if it is performed to ten million times, it can also be done.
This criticism is definitely not approved by Li Yanzhai ( Fat Yanzhai ) , which has a major feature , that is, it is extremely praiseworthy for the text of the novel.
As in the above comment: "It must not be said that it is received here, and the original text is not the main text." "Isn't it the opposite of this criticism?"
For example, a comment after the thirteenth "good thing ending" in the 5th "Dream of the Red Chamber" song
Jia Shu Ben 15B: The author has the heart of a bodhisattva, with the pen of a sword and axe, and wrote this book, a word can not be changed, a word is indispensable. (Mengfu Ben 20B, Qi Preface Ben 19B)
This is the criticism of Li Yanzhai, but it has been copied into a different shape by different copyists, but the inheritance relationship between the versions can also be seen from it. Mr. Wu Ming'en compiled the fat review, didn't he even get the pulse of the fat Yan Zhai?
24th
Gengchen Benmei Batch: Read "Drunken King Kong" once, eat Liu Xuan Danjia Hawthorn Pills, and smile.
Mr. Wu Ming'en said in the proofreading: "This comment is to say that reading the text of 'Drunken King Kong' makes people feel depressed and depressed, like eating a sticker of 'Liu Xuan Dan Hawthorn Pills'. Accordingly, the word 'service' should be changed to 'such as'. There is another interpretation: reading the 'Drunken King Kong' text will make people too refreshing, diarrhea is too much, it is necessary to eat a pair of 'Liu Xuan Dan Hawthorn Pills' to stop diarrhea. This does not need to be changed, but 'hawthorn pills' seem to have no effect on diarrhea. Press: Mountain check is hawthorn, function and stomach, digestion. ”
First, let's look at the other two side comments of the approver on Ni Er:
Text: Ni Er listened to the anger: "If it weren't for Uncle Ling, I would have scolded (not) to say good things, and I was really angry to kill me Ni Er!" ("No" is a derivative of the scribe)
Side Comment: Are there any righteous people who do not know etiquette? What is a broken settlement? King Kong has been wrongfully killed!
Text: Although Su Ri Ni Er is a rogue, he is made by people, and he is quite famous as a righteous hero. ”
Side comment: Four words are comments, rare and rare, non-Haojie can not be!
"The four characters are commentaries" refer to "the name of the righteous hero", but Mr. Wu Ming'en moved the criticism up, didn't he become a "prankster"? From these two criticisms, it can be seen that the critics feel indignant and indignant about Ni Er's "name of a righteous hero" and being called a "prankster". After reading this passage, I am depressed in my heart and my heart is knotted in my chest, so I must eat a "hawthorn pill" to help dissipate and dissipate.
The effect of "hawthorn pills" is only to strengthen the stomach and consume food, and Mr. Wu Ming'en can actually interpret it as "it is necessary to eat a pair of 'Liu Xuan Dan hawthorn pills' to stop diarrhea", is it not too rich in imagination? Probably Mr. Wu Ming'en mistakenly thought that Deng Suifu, the first person in grassroots red studies, was the judgment of the golden eye of fire, but in fact, he was "reversed" and changed to the deception of "Sheng (originally mistaken) eating Liu Xuan Danjia Hawthorn Pill Yifu", which produced another association, and the result was not to twist the bar and contradict the intention of the critics?
The scribes of the Jingzang Ben took the sentence "Eat Liu Xuan Danjia Hawthorn Pills one pay", and I don't know why they wanted to change it to "Fu Yun Ge Zhi Yi Tan An", which is more than outrageous and out of line! Lipogram is like a little girl dressed up, you can dress up how you want. The follow-up will be gradually proved by the interpretation of the lipid assessment by Mr. Zhou Ruchang, the master of the Red Studies Taidou, and Mr. Feng Qiyong, the highest authority of the Red Studies.