Xiang Ligang banned my comments, so I could only post a short article

1. Guo's rice appreciation and GIGABYTE's remarks are a kind of speech, as long as their investment is in the mainland, it will more or less drive the development of related industries in the mainland, enhance technology, and enhance the competitiveness of mainland products. Rational discussion, essence and speech cannot be equated, we want the development of China's science and technology.

2. The development of the chip industry cannot be achieved overnight, even if TSMC is restricted, it is difficult for the mainland chip process company to reach the world's advanced level within ten years. Our mainland companies in the advanced process and TSMC at least two generations of gap, not to mention the intermediate links with more American technology, if the technology to beautify, the time required is very long, this is our semiconductor industry historical accumulation and the actual environment caused. With TSMC limited, can our chip industry develop quickly?

3. The mainland is not only the chip industry, but also the new energy vehicle and consumer electronics industries. Chips are a huge industry, the downstream involves a wide range, new energy vehicles, mobile phones and other chips need to use advanced processes. In today's trade friction is more and more moved to the table, restricting the production of TSMC's advanced chip process is extremely unfavorable to the development of Chinese mainland downstream industries, is it not necessary for us to sacrifice the development of new energy vehicles and consumer electronics?

4. From the perspective of investment, if you use nationalism to limit TSMC, which high-tech company is willing to invest in us in the future?

5. The impact on China's chip industry should be strengthened by improving laws and regulations, such as the Anti-Monopoly Law, to prevent TSMC's dumping behavior from harming the development of mainland chip process enterprises.