Since the establishment of diplomatic relations more than 50 years ago, China and the United States have made certain achievements in cooperation in the economic and cultural fields. Although the relationship between China and the United States now presents a state of "confrontation" between the two countries, especially the United States tries to preemptively curb China's development through trade wars and military confrontations with China, so that China's overall strength can reach the "controllable range" of the US government. For this reason, China has also seen tricks, so that the US government's fist hit China's cotton, which cannot produce substantial deterrence and weakening significance.
Before the "you come and go" cooperation and confrontation between China and the United States, in 2008, the United States considered becoming a more "deep" partner with China, but it needed to make China show its due "sincerity". At the time of the Wall Street financial crisis, U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson personally flew to Beijing to use his connections as president of Goldman Sachs to try to persuade China to buy U.S. Treasury bonds and help the United States tide over the difficulties.
In fact, the treasury secretary's proposal is actually to let China take care of the financial crisis in the United States, so that the United States can tide over the difficulties, so that the US government can also see the "sincerity" of the Chinese government that it really wants to cooperate with the United States, so that the United States will sit back and watch China's development and no longer contain and attack China. Under Paulson's bitter persuasion and the repeated requests of the US government, the Chinese government still saved the United States once, taking over the US treasury debt, and also alleviating the adverse impact of the financial crisis on the world.
In that operation, of course, China not only saved the U.S. economy, but also had a long-term favorable impact on its own economy. If China had not sold the two-room bonds at that time, the US government would not have been able to take over the two-room bonds, there would have been bankruptcy, and the US finance would have collapsed. Due to China's sale, the two-room bond came back to life and became the most profitable enterprise in the United States again, so that the United States continued to remain strong, and China also made a lot of money in it.
In fact, the Chinese government was convinced that the United States could not allow the two-house bond bankruptcy before buying a large amount of income, and the final result proved that China's judgment was correct. If the financial crisis had not been taken out by China, and the middle-income and low-income groups in the United States had gone bankrupt in large numbers, the per capita purchasing power of the United States would have seriously declined, and China's exports to the United States would have been greatly affected, and in the worst cases, it would even lose hundreds of billions of dollars in trade surpluses. Therefore, at that time, China chose to intervene, not only saving the United States, but also accelerating China's rise.
Then, after China saved the United States, according to the original commitment of the Americans, the United States should stop containing China and any anti-China actions, and carry out closer cooperation with China. However, the U.S. government is thus untrustworthy and inconsistent. During the Oba President Ma and President Trump, the United States continued to carry out hostile actions against China, and even the so-called "Asia-Pacific rebalancing strategy" was proposed against China.
Under such circumstances, it is bound to be difficult for China and the United States to become partners without confrontation, and the concept of "Sino-US alliance" that the United States has previously considered is just a trick to use and infiltrate China. What is the purpose of the United States throwing out the "false olive branch"? In what way does the United States want to approach China and thus contain China? Here, let's first talk about the two reasons why China and the United States cannot "alliance".
The first reason is that after the United States vainly tries to ally with China, it will let China off guard through years of economic cooperation, so as to secretly deal with China militarily, and economically require China to assume more and more "responsibilities." When the new crown epidemic began to rage in the United States, but the epidemic in China gradually stabilized and decreased, a large number of American politicians launched a fierce public opinion attack on China, demanding that China should "compensate" for the losses of the United States.
After the defeat of the US presidential election, Trump even called for the United States to "claim $10 trillion from the Chinese", and these funds were mainly used to make up for the so-called "losses caused to the United States by the Wuhan epidemic". It can be seen that Americans have never really regarded China as a friend, even if China saved the United States once in 2008, the current United States is still extremely faceless, and when it has an accident, it wants China to give money (or even borrow money).
So, if China and the United States had really built a so-called "alliance," wouldn't the United States, with the political characteristics of the United States, not have used allies cleanly, and then run to China to suck blood when they declined? Obviously the U.S. would do that. As long as China wants to deepen cooperation with the United States, the United States is bound to need China to provide more manpower and material resources to "help" the United States in order to show "China's sincerity." It can be seen that the United States is actually a blood-sucking worm parasitic on the body of the world, which country has some money, the United States will run to suck blood to enrich itself (see Iraq, Saudi Arabia).
Under such circumstances, China does not need to form a so-called "alliance" with the United States, let alone become a "cash machine" for the US government, and China will continue to maintain a "non-alignment" policy and rise independently.
The second reason is that after China joined the alliance, the United States vainly dumped American culture and "American values" on a large scale on our culture that is developing, in a vain attempt to use cultural invasion to make Chinese people enslaved and controlled by the US government in terms of spiritual needs and ideological beliefs. As for the specific case of cultural invasion, we can first talk about the so-called "Western education" advocated by many new media public knowledge and bloggers.
In the early 21st century, China's folk once had the argument of "imitating the Western education model", when many so-called public intellectuals advocated that Western teachers never cared much about students, and could release students' nature and let students grow faster. However, after more than 20 years of practice and application, we found that the Western "free education" was actually false in the subsequent education reform, and the real actual content was the scam of "elite education".
In the United States, there is a clear gap between the level of private school education and the level of public free school education, and the final fate of most poor children and children of rich families has a world of different lives because of their different levels of education, and the descendants of the poor are still poor after all, while the children of American capitalists still become the so-called "social elite" after receiving a good education. From these points of view, China is not suitable for, nor should it imitate, the Western education model, if it imitates the way of Western countries, this is bound to cause the solidification of our social class, which will have a serious negative impact on China's political system.
China should uphold its own educational model, recognize its own cultural advantages, refer to the early days of the founding of New China, know that at that time, China had a population of 450 million, more than 80% were illiterate, of which only 20% of school-age children enrolled in school, and in just a few decades, socialist compulsory education for the whole people has cultivated hundreds of millions of outstanding talents for China, so that China has transformed from a backward agricultural country with illiteracy everywhere into a socialist industrial power. Facts have proved that China's education model is a broad road, and because of the invasion of Western culture, it is actually completely undesirable to blindly respect Western education.
In addition to education, the potential cultural penetration of China by the United States is only the tip of the iceberg. The comprehensive cultural invasion of China by the United States in movies, games, etc., as well as the smearing, slandering, and blockade of Chinese culture on a global scale, are all the results of a vain attempt to achieve cultural obliteration and cultural control over China. Can we rest assured that we can work with such a country? Combined with the United States' "revenge on China after the financial crisis", it is conceivable that we must be vigilant against US conspiracies and prevent peaceful evolution from the United States, only in this way can we make China rise and move toward rejuvenation!