laitimes

Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?

Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?

On March 20, the third edition of the world's strongest chess players decided to play the final in Tokyo, Japan. The Chinese chess player Ke Jie made a low-level mistake in the official stage, and finally lost to the South Korean chess player Park Tinghuan and was relegated to the second place.

In the final official stage of the bureau, Ke Jie followed the "Ke Pu Battle" of the Lunar New Year Cup in February, and once again appeared "fishing". Fortunately, after Ke Jie picked up the fallen chess piece, the hand has not left the chess piece, and then fell again in the position of the previous fall, and did not affect the final outcome of the victory or defeat, otherwise it would cause a huge "regret chess" controversy.

Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?

After Ke Jie dropped the child, his hand pressed tightly on the fallen white child for 2-3 seconds

Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?

Subsequently, Ke Jie picked up the pieces, but accidentally messed up the pieces on the previous board

Coincidentally, in the final of the Lunar New Year Cup that ended last month, Ke Jie played a low-level "spoon" in the final stage to bury a good round and lost to Park Tinghuan. In the final closing stage, the depressed Ke Jie also had similar behavior:

Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?
Ke Puzhan reproduced the "fishing style" move: Is this a repentant chess?

Ke Jie glued the wrong place when the sticky single was robbed, but then he immediately picked up the wrong son and glued it back to the correct place

Ke Jie's chess gestures often appear in the matches between amateur chess friends, and are called "fishing" moves in the chess community. In the previous Lunar New Year Cup, Ke Jie "performed" the fall of the finger did not leave the chess piece, and then took the chess piece back, and even quickly picked up the chess piece after falling in the wrong position to drop the piece again. In the final of the strongest chess battle, Ke Jie's "performance" was upgraded again, and he pressed his finger on the chess piece for a few seconds after he dropped the piece, and then withdrew the piece. Obviously, the above are all "fishing" drops.

Is the "fishing" move a foul?

The author consulted the Chinese Rules of Go, which have a clear definition of regret. According to point 3 of Article 17 of Chapter 3 of the Rules of Chinese Go, "Moving Chess" stipulates that the chess piece is out of hand, indicating that the right to sub-rights is completed. After completing the sub-right, the chess piece is picked up and placed elsewhere, which is called a regret chess.

Ke Jie is obviously well versed in the rules of the Go game in the game, so after falling, he presses his hand tightly on the chess piece, so that the chess piece has not left the hand, and obviously cannot be judged as a "repentant chess". It can be said that the "fishing" drop is to take advantage of the imperfection of the rules to maximize the interference of the opponent's thinking and disturb the opponent's mood.

So about Ke Jie's "fishing", what do the majority of chess friends think?

Attached: Professional Chess Players Repentance Chess Record (transferred from the blog of "White Tower Lake")

The story of Yamashiro Hiroshi's repentance

This was an incident that occurred in the 7th Toyo Securities Cup in 1995, and the two parties were Lee Chang-ho 7 Dan of South Korea and Hiroku Dan Yamashiro of Japan. I don't know if the game was too tense or if I had other ideas, but in the game, Yamashiro Hiroshi had a hand of chess that had been placed on the chessboard, and then picked up the pieces. Looking at the opponent's behavior, Lee Chang-ho, who was only 20 years old at the time, did not think at all, but looked at the chessboard and was stunned, and did not raise objections. Yamashiro Hiroshi was obviously aware of what he had done, and he blushed a lot, not knowing what to do. Lee Chang-ho did not raise any objections and the game continued. Perhaps it was Yamashiro Hirokudan who was upset by his remorseful behavior, and was always distracted in the later games, and finally lost the game by 5 and a half eyes.

Lee Chang-ho also repented

Coincidentally, the first person, Lee Chang-ho, also had a similar incident. At that time, Lee Chang-ho and Jin Banlu were playing in the second stage, and Lee Chang-ho put the chess pieces on the board and moved them again before letting go of his hand. This kind of thing can often be seen in today's games, especially some chess players make the pieces very loud, and the pieces fall on the board and then move. At that time, Kim Erdan protested Against Lee Chang-ho's behavior, saying that Lee Chang-ho was remorseful and had a debate about whether the opponent had left the chess piece. Later, from the TV video, Lee Chang-ho's hand did have a slight ion movement at that time, but this game did not rule Lee Chang-ho foul. Later, chess fans also jokingly called this behavior "fishing".

Liang Zaihao repented and was sentenced to lose

In the late 1980s, there was also a remorseful game between Jeong so-hyun and Leung Jae-ho. At that time, Liang Zaihao put the pieces on the chessboard in the game and then pulled them up, and in the face of this scene, the opponent immediately objected. But Liang Zaihao said that his hand did not leave the chess piece, in this case should not be considered a foul, the two were deadlocked, had to ask the referee, and the referee was not around at the time, and finally had to ask the recorder, the recorder proved that Liang Zaihao's hand had left the chess piece, and finally decided that Liang Zaihao lost.

Repentance sentenced the two to lose twice

In the Korean chess world, the most serious disturbance of regret chess was in 1996. The two players who participated in the game at that time were both judged to be defeated, which is a rare event in the history of Go. Since they involve the issue of personal reputation, they are referred to here as a eighth and fourth b. In the game between the two, the fourth paragraph of b showed remorse, and picked up the pieces that fell on the board again, seeing this scene, a eight paragraphs immediately raised objections: "What are you doing, how can you pick it up again when you have fallen?" The opponent said, "My hand did not leave the chess pieces." "In this way, the two of you argued endlessly with each other, and had to ask the referee to come out and sentence him." Unfortunately, the referee was not on the board at the time, and the situation was known only to the two opponents themselves.

There was no way, the organizers had to convene an emergency referee committee to study the game. Finally, a decision was made: "It is up to the two sides to negotiate, and if the negotiation fails and the game cannot continue, the two will lose at the same time." Both opponents were dissatisfied with the decision of the referee committee and could not continue the game, and both were judged to lose. This is the first time in the history of Korean Go and even in the history of world Go that there has been a double loss.

The Korean Chess Academy made explicit stipulations

For the handling of regret chess, it mainly depends on the attitude of both sides of the game. If one side has a remorseful move, and the opponent does not propose that the game continue, it is not a regret chess. If the referee finds out and raises objections to the player's violation, it is also a foul and should be punished.

In order to solve the "fishing" behavior in the game, the Korean Chess Academy made a special supplementary provision to the rules of the game in 1991. The following provisions are made for the act of repentance: "In the game, if the opponent moves his chess pieces on the board, in principle, it should be judged back to the original position, if it is really impossible to move back to the original position, the game can continue after consultation and consent of both parties, and if the two sides cannot reach an agreement, both sides will be judged to lose." ”

(Saury)