"Director Please Advise", many people expressed their love for Liang Long's "Crazy Alien", saying that it was very cinematic. I couldn't understand it, I really didn't know what he was trying to express when I watched it, and I was completely confused. After being stopped, the pretend film critics said that Liang Long was expressing loneliness, and I reacted that it did mean this, but the film still sucked to the point of slag, not only was there no connection between the clips, but the actors other than aliens were the worst, that is, dancing mothers, girls who drove go-karts, and men who read poetry. Big moms reflect the loneliness of aliens, while girls and men are just as lonely as aliens. But what? They appear inexplicably, disappear inexplicably, and are much worse than short videos. Not all that can't be understood are called literary films! It's either obscure or artistic! It's either pretense or culture! It's not that you say yes and you're really good!
Bi Zhifei's "Spring in a New Town", the most interesting part is the shooting link, he is really confused, do not know what to do, no logic, when reading the script, he actually wants to say two completely different scripts again, the more the actor questions, the more chaotic he is, the more disgusted the actor, the more he is bottomless, nervous brain blank, so that the script is forgotten. Of course, there is a suspicion that he did not write the script, although he claims to have written it himself.
The effect of the film is still very good for me, who has not seen the original "Spring in a Small Town", but everyone present said that this is a complete remake, there is no adaptation at all, and I began to be dissatisfied.
Looking at the shelling link after that, it was found that Bi Zhifei had read in college for more than ten years, although film critics were indeed very pretentious, at least their theoretical knowledge was still there, and Bi Zhifei, from language expression to knowledge reserves, was worse than amateur film lovers and even worse than ordinary audiences. Suggested that he change careers, stop being a director, and don't be a film critic.
As for the values that producer Fang Li has repeatedly emphasized, as a way to spray Bi Zhifei, I do not agree. He said that former women do manual work, and now women rely on wisdom; a man ceding his wife to another man is very pedantic and inconsistent with current values. I agree. But what he meant was that making a movie needed to cater to the values of the current era, such as letting a woman dominate and let her "marry" that man, which I firmly oppose. Every era has its own values, but is it necessarily right now? Not to mention that making a movie has to be catered to, what has become of this? Where is the personal expression of the director and screenwriter? Moreover, according to Fang Li, he does not care about the internal logic of the film, does not care about the true human nature, only political correctness, then "Spring in a Small Town" should be a bad film, right? The values are old and decaying! But is this talking about love triangles, is it about the pedanticness of letting go, it is talking about the spiritual dilemma of people. Whether it is to let or not let go, whether it is a man or a woman to dominate, the spiritual world of man is the focus, isn't it.
In these two episodes, my least favorite person is Xiang Guoqiang, he always has a "I know everything, I am the best" expression, when others are scolded, he smiles comfortably and looks at it, when he himself is scolded, he dismissively argues with dissatisfaction. His short films, I think, suck to a new level, like a grassroots play that doesn't understand movies at all. A film critic said it well, "Nezha Noisy Sea" roadside stall ring rail that shot has nothing but boring pretense. Other shots are also inexplicable. It can be seen that Xiang Guoqiang wants to play humor, but what he plays is ridiculous.