CBA semifinals are currently the end of the two halves of the game, Guangdong and Liaoning successful division finals, the two teams are sweeping their respective opponents to advance, and in the game that just ended last night, the Liaoning men's basketball team withstood the pressure to complete the semi-final double kill for Zhejiang Chouzhou, which is very important for the Liaoning men's basketball team, because once it is dragged to the third place by Zhejiang Chouzhou, it will be more passive, and it will also greatly consume the team's physical strength and energy, and will make the team have no chance to rest before the finals. Therefore, this time to defeat Zhejiang Chouzhou to advance to advance, it can also be regarded as a chance for the Liaoning men's basketball team to gain a chance to breathe.
After the end of this game between Liaoning and Zhejiang, many fans began to discuss the two penalties in the game, the referee of the game faced the same action but made different penalty results, Zhejiang team Zhu Continuing and Liaoning team Ferge, in the game, there was an offensive three-point shooting in the process of stretching the legs, which were also clearly recorded by the TV broadcast camera, and after Zhu Continued to stretch his legs and touched the defender Mayo, his own three-point shot hit, but because of the stretching of the legs to eat the foul, Zhu's three-pointer was effective, but gave Mayo two free throws and one throw.
And in Fergus's leg extension was encountered by the defensive player Wang Yibo, but this time the referee directly awarded Wang Yibo's defensive foul, it is obvious that according to the standard of the previous Zhu Continuance penalty, this time Ferge's shot in the air stretched his legs and was intentionally forward to extend his legs, and he should directly eat a foul, even if it is not a violation of physical fitness, he should also attack the foul, and this time the referee awarded a defensive foul, and the results of these two penalties are obviously unfavorable to Zhejiang Chouzhou. The same two fouls were double-marked by the referees, which also caused strong dissatisfaction from Zhejiang Chouzhou.
The double standard penalty of Guo Nan, the no. 60 bald referee of this game, once again caused a huge controversy, if it were not for the different results of these two penalties, perhaps Zhejiang Chouzhou played to the end with a full chance, after all, this ball Zhejiang Chouzhou backwater battle, in the end is only a pity to lose, the loss is also more regrettable, if the two sides get these two equal treatment on the ball, maybe Zhejiang Chouzhou really has a chance to win the game, so the referee once again became the game-grabber.
Referees can have different law enforcement styles, and even have different law enforcement efforts, but the law enforcement scale of 3 referees in a game must be unified, otherwise this referee is strict, and the other two are relaxed, then there will definitely be some major double-standard dispute penalties in the game, such a game will appear fragmented and impossible to play, and I hope that such a thing will not appear in the finals that we are about to start playing.
The third stage of the CBA league regular season has been released by the league, in the face of major violations will be punished, so the referee in the field of such a serious mistake double standard penalty, will not also face the top sanctions? This season's referee problem concentrated outbreak, absolutely not accidental, even FIBA has intervened in the referee problem, but also hope that our league will pay good attention to it, against the referee of gross negligence to punish to the end, only in this way can we give back the players on both sides a fair.