If you are a witness who has no interest in a lawsuit, is that still called a witness, and that is called a melon-eating masses

Witnesses are found by one of the parties, and the person who testifies for himself comes at the time of the trial. The other party cannot apply for the recusal of the other party's witnesses, because the witnesses have an interest in this party.

Who has nothing to do to be a witness... Generally, witnesses are either relatives, good friends, or very familiar. In general, they all have an interest in this party, and people do not come for no reason, either to return human feelings, or to have other interests, can you expect the other party's witnesses to be fair and just, why does he not testify to others, not to testify to you, but to testify to the other side.

The witness is a rescuer found by one party, hoping to work together to defeat the other party and win the case, so the witness must have an interest in one party. If there is no stake, it is not called a witness, it is called a melon-eating masses, and the melon-eating masses do not have the spare time to testify. There is no benefit, no one is going to testify.

Therefore, this also explains why the court's admissibility of witness testimony is so low, and in the absence of documentary evidence, audio or video recordings, and expert opinions, the degree of acceptance of witness testimony is basically 0. Where you have other evidence, witness testimony is at best the icing on the cake, i.e. without witness testimony, you can basically win.