There are two popular sayings in society: examination and examination, the teacher's magic weapon; points and points, the lifeblood of students. Although it shows the helplessness of teachers and students, it reflects a social reality, because the "pass rate" and "eugenics rate" are the two important indicators to measure the quality of teaching. In order to pursue a high "pass rate" and "eugenics rate", repeated training, mechanical memory, memorization, transcription, etc. deduced have become an inevitable choice in teachers' teaching. I know of a top school class that actually did dozens of sets of questions a week. In such a context, can the burden on students not be heavy? In such training, the score may go up, but the learning interest, fun, and child's Reiki may also be practiced.
Mathematics master Chen Shengsheng wrote an inscription for the junior class of the University of Science and Technology of China before his death: Don't score 100 points. Zhu Qingshi, then president of the University of Science and Technology of China, explained that the original ecological students can generally score 70 or 80 points in the examination, and if they want to score 100 points, they must work several times harder, and they must be very skilled in training to make no small mistakes. To compete for these 100 points, it is necessary to waste a lot of time and resources, which is equivalent to the land to apply fertilizer 10 times, and finally the creativity of the students is worn out.
Based on the above understanding, in the school quality assessment, I announced to the teacher that anyone whose test score exceeds the school's control index by more than 5% will not be rewarded. A lot of people find it incomprehensible. Isn't the higher the average score and eugenics rate, the better? How can you not be rewarded for doing well on the test? But I think that high scores that exceed normal rules are meaningless and even harmful to the development of children.
At the primary school level, children are consolidated through normal learning and revision, and most children's subject scores can reach about 92 points. If you practice the same knowledge repeatedly, you may be able to reach 99 or 100, but the extra few points are the result of "over-learning", useless learning, meaningless. Instead of allowing students to repeat mechanical exercises, it is better for children to use this time to read extracurricular books and participate in extracurricular activities for their children's development!
"Over-learning" gets a high score, I don't advocate!