On November 1, Beijing time, the CBA sent a new heavy penalty news, a ticket that shocked everyone was issued, and Guangzhou coach Guo Shiqiang officially announced that he would be suspended for 5 games and fined 20,000 yuan, which was the most serious ticket since the start of the new CBA season.
The last ticket in the league was issued to Zhao Rui of guangdong team, when Zhao Rui insulted the referee and was severely fined, suspended for 1 game and fined 50,000, which was to maintain the authority of the referee, and his fine has been considered very serious, is there anything more serious? Today we have all seen that Guo Shiqiang was actually suspended for 5 games and fined 20,000 yuan, and the reason was only because he pointed out a penalty error of a live referee, and the mistake he pointed out was really the referee's own problem, but now we all saw the official attitude of the CBA, they are making their attitude clear, even if they are wrong, they will not change, and you cannot challenge my authority.
CBA official data announcement shows that due to guangzhou team head coach Guo Shiqiang questioned and blamed, and ignored league discipline, serious interference with the game, etc., so in the end Guo Shiqiang was suspended for 5 games and fined 20,000, which is a thunderbolt blow to Guangzhou, they just ranked 5th in the league, all the way to achieve very, very good results, in front of Guangzhou the two top giants of Guangdong Liaoning, plus Zhejiang Shuangxiong, all are the top teams competing for the championship, As a result, now Guangzhou, such an inspirational youth army team, under the leadership of Guo Shiqiang, just on the right track, it was difficult to come to the top 5 positions of the league, almost approaching the four giants, the bad news came, Guo Shiqiang will be suspended for 5 games, these 5 games back, guangzhou team ranking can never be stable in this position.
The real reason for this series of judgments is only because Guo Shiqiang questioned the referee's blowing penalty in the previous guangzhou match against Jilin. At that time, in the last moment of the game, Jilin side led 94:93, Guangzhou team Zhu Mingzhen made a tactical foul on the opponent's Cui Jinming, at this time Zhu Mingzhen 6 fouls, Guangzhou needed to replace him, and the referee actually directly let Cui Jinming go to the free throw, did not wait for Guangzhou to change people, this procedure is wrong. So Guo Shiqiang put forward 2 major questions, first of all, he questioned that Guangzhou had not finished changing people, the referee let Jilin take a free throw, which was a serious mistake by the referee, and more importantly, when Jilin Dai Huaibo received the ball on the bottom line, there was an obvious walking action.
He first avoided the guangzhou players with a walking action, and then he had the story behind. So after Cui Jinming finished the first ball, Guo Shiqiang yelled and protested very seriously, the protest lasted for nearly 10 minutes, and the on-site referee even warned Guo Shiqiang that if he continued to protest for another 3 minutes, he would directly start the abstaining procedure and sentence Guangzhou to lose 0-20. So Guo Shiqiang dragged to the last minute, chose to replace to continue the game, before the penalty does not count, Cui Jinming heavy penalty, this time Cui Jinming two penalties missed, Guangzhou killed. And the referee problem pointed out by Guo Shiqiang is not wrong, because Dai Huaibo's ball is a clear step, he does not know why the referee is under the eyelids of a step actually does not blow, everyone knows that it is a step, but the referee just did not blow.
Guo Shiqiang is a reasonable questioning of the referee, there is such a serious missed judgment, and at the same time think that the referee has a big problem in the process, he pointed out that the two errors are not a problem, but now the CBA official gave the penalty, he challenged the authority of the referee and was punished, which is almost a warning to all people, or to kill him to scare the monkey, no one is allowed to question the authority of the referee, even if the referee is wrong, you are not allowed to question the problem. But if this is done, will Yao Ming's CBA and the Chinese Basketball Association still have credibility? Because Guo Shiqiang pointed out correctly, the other party is indeed walking, even people who do not understand basketball know that when the era of Huaibo's walking action is that the referee did not see it, everyone else saw it.
So is it appropriate for Guo Shiqiang to reasonably point out that the referee's missed judgment is now being heavily fined? Among other things, the Beijing team had previously led the farce of the strike, and the head coach Xie Libin led the team across the stadium, when Xie Libin's behavior was directly suspended for 4 games and fined 20,000 yuan. That is to say, a head coach who led the strike only banned 4 games and only fined 20,000, and a coach who reasonably pointed out the referee's error is now suspended for 5 games and fined 20,000, which is more serious? Believe in what is right and wrong, and everyone has a scale in their hearts. But here I would like to ask, if it is really necessary to carry out such a punishment, then it is not only unfair to guangzhou team, but also unfair to all other teams, which is obviously to protect the referee who made mistakes.
This time, the referee made a mistake, and the uncle paid the bill.